|
Size: 698
Comment:
|
Size: 1227
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 9: | Line 9: |
| * Reported later, the main reason the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum | * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum |
| Line 12: | Line 12: |
| * | * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum |
| Line 14: | Line 14: |
| * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]] * Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control * There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light * Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction * Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing. |
Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)
- Hammering test
Task list (Done)
- Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
- There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
- Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
- Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
- Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
- Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
- Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
- There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
- Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
- Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
Task list (Partially done)
Task list (todo ; must items)
Task list (todo ; if possible)