Differences between revisions 2 and 24 (spanning 22 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2020-03-09 03:49:25
Size: 74
Comment:
Revision 24 as of 2020-03-09 06:23:26
Size: 5453
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
== Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020) == = Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020) =
Line 3: Line 3:
=== Hammering test === == - Hammering test ==

=== Task list (Done) ===

 * Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]]
  * There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
  * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum

 * Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]]
  * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum

 * Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]]
  * Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
  * There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
  * Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
  * Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.

 * Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]]
  * The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
  * In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
  * After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.


=== Task list (Partially done) ===

 * Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz

 * Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz

 * Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much

 * Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much

 * Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz

 * Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]
  * SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz

 * Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]]



=== Task list (todo ; must items) ===

 * Hammering test around BS chamber
  * Possible noise source 70-100Hz
  * Identification the noise path
   * From leg? From oplev? From duct?
  * Set accelerometer for feed-forward

 * Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
  * We didn't get any information from those chambers

 * Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
  * This chamber is including the ISS system
  * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
  * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
  * Identification of the noise path

 * Hammering test of the MCF chamber
  * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
  * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
  * Identification of the noise path

 * Hammering test of the cryochamber
  * [[http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Minute|Discussion]]

 * Hammering test of the ducts
  * To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
  * We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test

 * Hammering test of the optical tables
  * (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table
  * (Should) POS table, TMSX table, TMSY table
  * (If possible) OpLev tables, PCal tables

=== Task list (todo ; if possible) ===

== - PEM injection ==

=== Task list (Done) ===
 * Vibration injection to OMC leg for optical table
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13152|klog13152]]
  * We confirmed that the vibration from OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve

 * Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
  * We couldn't find the any excess

 * Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)
  * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13231|klog13231]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13338|klog13338]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13382|klog13382]]
  * From [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13382|klog13382]], we can see the some excesses 100-600Hz
  * Washimi-san and TTanaka-san are analyzing data now.

=== Task list (todo ; must items) ===

 * Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
  * After hammering test, we will investigate the environmental vibration may appear to the sensitivity or not

 * Acoustic injection to the POP table

 * Acoustic injection to the cryochamber

=== Task list (todo ; if possible) ===

 * Magnetic injection

== - Other task by PEM(?) ==

=== Task list (done) ===

=== Task list (todo) ===

 * Check and remove the unused cables

 * Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument

Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)

- Hammering test

Task list (Done)

  • Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
  • Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
    • There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
    • Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
    • Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
  • Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
    • klog13105

    • The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
    • In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
    • After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.

Task list (Partially done)

  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
    • klog13138

    • SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
  • Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Hammering test around BS chamber
    • Possible noise source 70-100Hz
    • Identification the noise path
      • From leg? From oplev? From duct?
    • Set accelerometer for feed-forward
  • Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
    • We didn't get any information from those chambers
  • Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
    • This chamber is including the ISS system
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the MCF chamber
    • We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
    • We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
    • Identification of the noise path
  • Hammering test of the cryochamber
  • Hammering test of the ducts
    • To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
    • We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test
  • Hammering test of the optical tables
    • (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table
    • (Should) POS table, TMSX table, TMSY table
    • (If possible) OpLev tables, PCal tables

Task list (todo ; if possible)

- PEM injection

Task list (Done)

  • Vibration injection to OMC leg for optical table
    • klog13152

    • We confirmed that the vibration from OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve
  • Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
    • We couldn't find the any excess
  • Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)

Task list (todo ; must items)

  • Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
    • After hammering test, we will investigate the environmental vibration may appear to the sensitivity or not
  • Acoustic injection to the POP table
  • Acoustic injection to the cryochamber

Task list (todo ; if possible)

  • Magnetic injection

- Other task by PEM(?)

Task list (done)

Task list (todo)

  • Check and remove the unused cables
  • Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020 (last edited 2020-03-21 04:36:19 by TakaakiYokozawa)