Size: 74
Comment:
|
Size: 6619
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
== Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020) == | = Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020) = |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
=== Hammering test === | * Summary result of the acoustic injection [[KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/MAR2020/Acoustic_result| here]] == Priority of task == * Hammering test of the cryochamber * If Tomaru-san or Ushiba-san help == - Hammering test == === Task list (Done) === * Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]] * There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum * Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]] * Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum * Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]] * Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control * There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light * Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction * Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing. * Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13105|klog13105]] * The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror * In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz * After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again. * Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz * Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz * Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much * Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much * Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz * Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz * Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]] * Hammering test around BS chamber * When hammering the bellows between PR2 and BS, 70-100Hz was excited. Scattered noise? * It seems from duct * Set accelerometer for feed-forward * But, we couldn't see in the spectrum of the portable ACC. * Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber * Finally, we found that vibration around the IMC gate valve is the path to DARM displacement. * Most suspect noise path is scattered light from AR MCO reflected around gate valve and back to main laser. * Reducing the vibration. * Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber * This chamber is including the ISS system * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks. * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber * No significant result was obtained * Hammering test of the MCF chamber * We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks. * We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber * We had several noise increasing, Washimi-san investigate now. * We also do hammering test to the PSL window * Hammering test of the optical tables * (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table, ISS table * (Should) POS table * (If possible) OpLev tables (PR area) * We can find 500Hz noise may come from the REFL table === Task list (todo ; must items) === * Hammering test of the cryochamber * [[http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Minute|Discussion]] * Hammering test of the ducts * To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts * We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test * Hammering test of the optical tables * (Should) TMSX table, TMSY table * (If possible) PCal tables === Task list (todo ; if possible) === * Hammering test of the IXA and IYA chamber * Non black coating materials * Hammering test of the end station * EXC, EYC, EXA, EYA chambers * TMSX, TMSY chamber == - PEM injection == === Task list (Done) === * Vibration injection to OMC legs * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13152|klog13152]] * We confirmed that the vibration of the OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve * Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.) * We couldn't find the any excess * Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13231|klog13231]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13338|klog13338]], [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13382|klog13382]] * From [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13382|klog13382]], we can see the some excesses 100-600Hz * Washimi-san and TTanaka-san are analyzing data now. * Acoustic injection to the POP table (11th Mar.) * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13458|klog13458]] * Large excess 320-400Hz (Related ISS? new noise candidate?) * Acoustic injection to the cryochamber * Done to IXC. Effect would be small. === Task list (todo ; must items) === * Vibration injection to legs of the chambers * We did for MCF and IMM legs, but we can ignore the vibration * We set the oscillator and accelerometer to OMC leg again === Task list (todo ; if possible) === * Magnetic injection == - Other task by PEM(?) == === Task list (done) === === Task list (todo) === * Check and remove the unused cables * Clean up on the optical table * Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument * Turn off the some lights * Clean up the experimental area * Clean environment may make the clean experiment |
Memo for Commissioning break (Mar. 2020)
Summary result of the acoustic injection here
Priority of task
- Hammering test of the cryochamber
- If Tomaru-san or Ushiba-san help
- Hammering test
Task list (Done)
- Hammering test of the OMC chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
- There is excess in the sensitivity between 100 Hz to 400 Hz
- Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
- Hammering test AS table (Done 22nd Feb.)
- Reported later, the main reason is the vibration to the OMC legs for the optical table inside the vacuum
- Reflection light check (Done 22nd Feb.)
- Now we didn't use the AS PD signals for interferometer control
- There was possibility that the reflection light from AS table make dirty scattering light
- Shadowed between the OMC viewport and AS table, but we couldn't see the clear noise reduction
- Also, when we added vibration to the OMC viewport, we couldn't detect the noise increasing.
- Hammering test SRM chamber (Done 22nd Feb.)
- The SRM mirror is misaligned. So We need to investigate the scattering light from SRM mirror
- In this test, we can see the excess above 100 Hz
- After this test, we cannot lock the interferometer. So if we have a time, we want to check again.
- Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
- PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
- Hammering test between PR2 and BS, PR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
- PR2-BS duct give excess noise around 70-100 Hz
- Hammering test between BS and SR2, BS side (Done 24th Feb.)
- BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
- Hammering test between BS and SR2, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
- BS-SR2 duct give slight excess noise but not much
- Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR2 side (Done 24th Feb.)
- SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
- Hammering test between SR2 and SR3, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
- SR2-SR3 duct give broadband exces noise around 100-400 Hz
- Hammering test between SR3 and SRM, SR3 side (Done 24th Feb.)
- Hammering test around BS chamber
- When hammering the bellows between PR2 and BS, 70-100Hz was excited. Scattered noise?
- It seems from duct
- Set accelerometer for feed-forward
- But, we couldn't see in the spectrum of the portable ACC.
- When hammering the bellows between PR2 and BS, 70-100Hz was excited. Scattered noise?
- Hammering test of the PR2, PR3, PRM, IMMT2 chamber
- Finally, we found that vibration around the IMC gate valve is the path to DARM displacement.
- Most suspect noise path is scattered light from AR MCO reflected around gate valve and back to main laser.
- Reducing the vibration.
- Hammering test of the IMMT1 chamber
- This chamber is including the ISS system
- We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
- We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
- No significant result was obtained
- Hammering test of the MCF chamber
- We performed the acoustic injection and identified the some noise peaks.
- We placed the accelerometer on the leg of the IMMT1 chamber
- We had several noise increasing, Washimi-san investigate now.
- We also do hammering test to the PSL window
- Hammering test of the optical tables
- (Must) IMC REFL table, REFL table, POP table, ISS table
- (Should) POS table
(If possible) OpLev tables (PR area)
- We can find 500Hz noise may come from the REFL table
Task list (todo ; must items)
- Hammering test of the cryochamber
- Hammering test of the ducts
- To check the scattered light effect, we want to perform the hammering test to the all ducts
- We will ask Akutsu-san and Aso-san for the priority for following test
- Hammering test of the optical tables
- (Should) TMSX table, TMSY table
- (If possible) PCal tables
Task list (todo ; if possible)
- Hammering test of the IXA and IYA chamber
- Non black coating materials
- Hammering test of the end station
- EXC, EYC, EXA, EYA chambers
- TMSX, TMSY chamber
- PEM injection
Task list (Done)
- Vibration injection to OMC legs
- We confirmed that the vibration of the OMC leg is under the sensitivity curve
- Acoustic injection to the PSL room(29th Feb.)
- We couldn't find the any excess
- Acoustic injection to REFL table(29th Feb., 5th Mar. 7th Mar.)
- Acoustic injection to the POP table (11th Mar.)
- Large excess 320-400Hz (Related ISS? new noise candidate?)
- Acoustic injection to the cryochamber
- Done to IXC. Effect would be small.
Task list (todo ; must items)
- Vibration injection to legs of the chambers
- We did for MCF and IMM legs, but we can ignore the vibration
- We set the oscillator and accelerometer to OMC leg again
Task list (todo ; if possible)
- Magnetic injection
- Other task by PEM(?)
Task list (done)
Task list (todo)
- Check and remove the unused cables
- Clean up on the optical table
- Check and turn off the unnecessary instrument
- Turn off the some lights
- Clean up the experimental area
- Clean environment may make the clean experiment