Differences between revisions 12 and 13
⇤ ← Revision 12 as of 2020-01-20 16:36:47 →
Size: 964
Editor: tatsuki.washimi
Comment:
← Revision 13 as of 2020-01-21 10:40:38 → ⇥
Size: 1442
Editor: chihiro.kozakai
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 22: Line 22:
  * Purpose
   * Glitch origin identification practice (Omicron, hveto, GlitchPlot)
   * Veto threshold reference data
   * Noise subtraction test
  * Request
   * Injection flag (or segment file ?)
   * Information about impact points, related PEM channels (accelerometers ?) and time
   * Taking silent data once in a lock segment (~ 1min ?)
   * Various impact strength
  * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11382|slides]]

KAGRA PEM meeting focused on the Hammering test in Y-end Cryostat & Beamduct

Purpose of this meeting

  • Get the consensus for each each others
    • targets of the hammering test
    • hammering positions (where?, how many?)
    • quality and quantity of data for each hammering
    • what channels showld we check inline?
    • schedule of the hammering test

Agenda

  • Prepairation of hardware and analysis (Washimi)
  • Opinion from CRY (Kimura, Ushiba, Yamada?)
  • Opinion from AOS (Akutsu)
  • (Opinion from IFO)
  • Opinion from Detchar (Kozakai)
    • Purpose

      • Glitch origin identification practice (Omicron, hveto, GlitchPlot)

      • Veto threshold reference data
      • Noise subtraction test
    • Request
      • Injection flag (or segment file ?)
      • Information about impact points, related PEM channels (accelerometers ?) and time
      • Taking silent data once in a lock segment (~ 1min ?)
      • Various impact strength

    • slides

  • ...

  • Disucussion about othre place (OpLev, table, ...)

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Agenda (last edited 2020-01-21 15:31:10 by tatsuki.washimi)