Differences between revisions 13 and 14
⇤ ← Revision 13 as of 2020-01-21 10:40:38 →
Size: 1442
Editor: chihiro.kozakai
Comment:
← Revision 14 as of 2020-01-21 15:23:55 → ⇥
Size: 1462
Editor: tatsuki.washimi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 17: Line 17:
 * Opinion from CRY (Kimura, Ushiba, Yamada?)
   *[[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11374|JGW-T2011374]]		  * Opinion from CRY
    * Kimura : [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11374|JGW-T2011374]]
    * Ushiba :
    * Yamada :

KAGRA PEM meeting focused on the Hammering test in Y-end Cryostat & Beamduct

Purpose of this meeting

  • Get the consensus for each each others
    • targets of the hammering test
    • hammering positions (where?, how many?)
    • quality and quantity of data for each hammering
    • what channels showld we check inline?
    • schedule of the hammering test

Agenda

  • Prepairation of hardware and analysis (Washimi)
  • Opinion from CRY
  • Opinion from AOS (Akutsu)
  • (Opinion from IFO)
  • Opinion from Detchar (Kozakai)
    • Purpose

      • Glitch origin identification practice (Omicron, hveto, GlitchPlot)

      • Veto threshold reference data
      • Noise subtraction test
    • Request
      • Injection flag (or segment file ?)
      • Information about impact points, related PEM channels (accelerometers ?) and time
      • Taking silent data once in a lock segment (~ 1min ?)
      • Various impact strength

    • slides

  • ...

  • Disucussion about othre place (OpLev, table, ...)

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Agenda (last edited 2020-01-21 15:31:10 by tatsuki.washimi)