Differences between revisions 5 and 13 (spanning 8 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 5 as of 2020-01-15 09:32:22 →
Size: 317
Editor: tatsuki.washimi
Comment:
← Revision 13 as of 2020-01-21 10:40:38 → ⇥
Size: 1442
Editor: chihiro.kozakai
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
== KAGRA PEM meeting focused on the Hammering test plan == == KAGRA PEM meeting focused on the Hammering test in Y-end Cryostat & Beamduct ==
Line 3: Line 3:
 * Kamioka 2F meeting room
Line 5: Line 6:
=== Purpose of this meeting ===
 * Get the consensus for each each others
   * targets of the hammering test
   * hammering positions (where?, how many?)
   * quality and quantity of data for each hammering
   * what channels showld we check inline?
   * schedule of the hammering test
Line 6: Line 15:
Line 8: Line 16:
   * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11379|JGW-G2011379]]
Line 9: Line 18:
   *[[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11374|JGW-T2011374]]
Line 11: Line 21:
 * Opinion from Detchar (Kozakai)
  * Purpose
   * Glitch origin identification practice (Omicron, hveto, GlitchPlot)
   * Veto threshold reference data
   * Noise subtraction test
  * Request
   * Injection flag (or segment file ?)
   * Information about impact points, related PEM channels (accelerometers ?) and time
   * Taking silent data once in a lock segment (~ 1min ?)
   * Various impact strength
  * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11382|slides]]
 * ...
 * Disucussion about othre place (OpLev, table, ...)

KAGRA PEM meeting focused on the Hammering test in Y-end Cryostat & Beamduct

Purpose of this meeting

  • Get the consensus for each each others
    • targets of the hammering test
    • hammering positions (where?, how many?)
    • quality and quantity of data for each hammering
    • what channels showld we check inline?
    • schedule of the hammering test

Agenda

  • Prepairation of hardware and analysis (Washimi)
  • Opinion from CRY (Kimura, Ushiba, Yamada?)
  • Opinion from AOS (Akutsu)
  • (Opinion from IFO)
  • Opinion from Detchar (Kozakai)
    • Purpose

      • Glitch origin identification practice (Omicron, hveto, GlitchPlot)

      • Veto threshold reference data
      • Noise subtraction test
    • Request
      • Injection flag (or segment file ?)
      • Information about impact points, related PEM channels (accelerometers ?) and time
      • Taking silent data once in a lock segment (~ 1min ?)
      • Various impact strength

    • slides

  • ...

  • Disucussion about othre place (OpLev, table, ...)

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200121/Agenda (last edited 2020-01-21 15:31:10 by tatsuki.washimi)