Weekly PEM meeting
- 2020/02/28(Fri) 16:00-(JST)
- Regular meeting meeting (Japanese)
Web meeting with Zoom2 (Zoom2)
Agenda
General issue
- Interferometer status
- Observation run started without O3 joining
- Average ~250kpc BNS detection range
- Lock duration is 1h -4h
- Alignment dependence
- Duty cycle ~65%
- We need ~1h for initial alignment
- 3/10 - commissioning break(?)
- Maintenance day (2020/03/03)
- I asked SEO about following works
- If you have more request, please let Yokozawa or Washimi-san know first.
- 1. (Highest priority from PEM team)
- Go inside the mine and move the PEMs placed at OMC legs to next noise target.
- Next target is under discussion(Candidate is IXC area).
- Change the position of the speaker to around POP area
- We don’t need the interferometer during this work.
- 1 hour work.
- Yokozawa, Washimi
- 2. (If possible)
- Go inside the mine.
- Turned on the all FFUs(~5min) to evaluate the noise from FFUs.
- If we can observe the noise from FFUs in the sensitivity curve, we can consider next target.
- If we cannot observe the noise, current noise limit may not come from the sound inside the clean area.
- We need the interferometer during this work.
- 10min work
- Yokozawa, Washimi
- 3. (If possible)
- Go inside the mine
- Hammering test to the cryochambers and ducts and so on to investigate the vibration effects.
- We need the interferometer during this work.
- Also, the hammering test PR and IMC area is essential
- PEM tasks during observation run
- PEM injection
- Shaker and Acoustic injection
- PSL, REFL and AS table injection again
- Saturday afternoon(2/29) between the lock loss and observing state
- Shaker and Acoustic injection
- Hammering test
Hammering tests to the OMC, SRs, BS and PR2 were done [http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13138|klog13138]
- There is large excitation when we touched the legs of the OMC chamber
- But we concluded that vibration of the logs of the OMC chamber were not the dominant noise source in the current sensitivity
- Next target of investigation is the duct between PR2 and BS
- Candidate of the 60-90Hz noise
- Discussion about the PEM flags
- This may not be used during O3 run, but it is good practice toward the O4 run
- Help the RRT(Rapid Response Team, quick discussion for the event submitted to the GraceCB)
- Evaluate the effect of the FFUs and vacuum pumps by turning on during interferometer lock
- If the excitation detected, we have to consider about the FFUs which are working.
- Set portable PEMs to the some point for the O3 run
- Now, the legs of the OMC
- Next target is IXC or PR2-BS or somewhere PRs or IMC area.
- PEM injection
- Conference
JPS (2020/3/16-19 @ Nagoya)-> Cancelled
- Yokozawa, TTanaka
F2F (2020/4/17-20 @ Kashiwa) wiki
- Core to core application
- Miyoki-san suggested to visit Virgo to join the commissioning as the PEM team
- If you have interested in please let me know
- Other interesting conference? Deadline is 29th Feb.
- Application of the author list
- [kagra 03345] from Somiya-san e-mail
- Deadline : 29th Feb.
- エフォート率など相談がありましたら横澤までご連絡ください。
- PEM meeting
- Tuesday may be a maintenance day
- I want to move PEM meeting to Friday and discuss what should we do during maintenance day.
- Earlier time is better?
Each progress
- Yokozawa
- Discussion about the list of the general issue
- Current line noise identification
- PEM coherence search to the longer locked data
- GND issue
- Washimi
- TTanaka
- 23.3Hz noise investigation
- Yuzurihara