Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2020-06-04 13:12:33
Size: 4770
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2020-06-05 09:27:10
Size: 5204
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 12: Line 12:
  * deadline 6/4

 * 新学術地下宇宙 (6/2-4)
  * Online meeting [[https://www.lowbg.org/ugap/ws/am2020/index.html?LangP=JP&InputContents=Prog|web]]
  * Washimi has an invited talk on 6/3 [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11716|slide]] (posted to the CPC)
  * Yokoyama-san also has a talk (not KAGRA?)
  * Yokozawa will present about the PEM activity
Line 22: Line 17:
  * Now interferometer is "suspend mode"
   * Measurements without interferometer
   * Keep the IMC lock
   * Check the green laser flash
  * Now interferometer is "suspend mode" but post-observation
   * 6/1-6/5 Suspension noise budget, PEM injection
   * 6/8-6/12 Interferometer parameter measurements
Line 27: Line 21:
   * Large frequency
   * Close from KAGRA. Damage to alignment
   * Frequency was reduced
   * But there are many earthquakes in Japan.
Line 31: Line 25:
  * [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1w4q8OvX9E6nkYSgshLYLoZH5yvQXHvGmL1agux8ztx0/edit?usp=sharing|post commissioning]]
 
* Vibration measurement for OpLevs (+Ushiba, 6/1,3,4)
 
* Acoustic injection (nest nest week?)
      *
Day 1 : For only REFL (remote work) -> study of nonlinearity & up/down conversion (washimi will make more detaid plan)
      * Day 2 : For each booth (mine work) -> noise budget
   * Scattered light
      * One of the hammering test
   
* OMC chamber vibration RMS
 
* Line noise investigation by PEM

 * P
EM meeting schedule
   * Washimi needs to join the VIS meeting (Fri
. 14:00-15:30)
  * Vibration measurement for OpLevs (+Ushiba, 6/1,4)-> Done
* Acoustic injection
   * 6/5 :
Day 1 : For only REFL (remote work) -> study of nonlinearity & up/down conversion (washimi will make more detaid plan)
   * Unclear : Day 2 : For each booth (mine work) -> noise budget
  * Scattered light
   * One of the hammering test (lower priority, open the chamber and check)
* OMC chamber vibration RMS (lower priority, open the chamber and check)
* Line noise investigation by PEM
   * No action from DAC, SEO and noise budget team. Maybe skipped.
Line 45: Line 36:
  * We can do data analysis in your home. Let's check PEM data!

 * Useful management tools
  * Easy communication : Slack
  * Task management : GitHub
  * Software management : GitHub
  * Papers : Overleaf
Line 58: Line 56:
  * Portable PEMs (Yokozawa+)
   * Target journal->to be discussed later (NIM? PTEP? JINST?)
   * Chromebook+USB PEMs, aco power supply+BNC PEMs+KAGRA DAQ
  * Portable PEMs (Yokozawa+) ''''<<Start investigation>>'''
   * Target journal->to be discussed later (PTEP?)
   * section
      1. Introduction
      2. Environmental noise
      3. Portable PEM1 : BNC type PEMs(Change the word)
      4. Portable PEM2 : Chromebook type
       4.1 USB type PEMs
       4.2 Combination with Chromebook and USB tpye PEMs
       4.3 Recording system and offline analysis
       4.4 Vibration injection
      5. Examples of noise investigation
       5.1 44Hz vibration noise
       5.2 Sound and vibration from air conditioner and FFU
       5.3 Oshino-san, Shimode-san magnetic field with circuit
       5.4 Noise investigation at OMC chamber
      6. Conclusion
Line 62: Line 74:
  * Ground motion paper (Yokozawa)   * Ground motion paper (Yokozawa+)
Line 111: Line 123:

Weekly PEM meeting

Agenda

Conference issue

  • JPS meeting
    • Online meeting web

    • Yokozawa will present about the PEM activity

General issue

  • Interferometer status
    • Now interferometer is "suspend mode" but post-observation
      • 6/1-6/5 Suspension noise budget, PEM injection
      • 6/8-6/12 Interferometer parameter measurements
    • Earthquakes at Hida area is serious
      • Frequency was reduced
      • But there are many earthquakes in Japan.
  • Tasks for post-commissioning
    • Vibration measurement for OpLevs (+Ushiba, 6/1,4)-> Done

    • Acoustic injection
      • 6/5 : Day 1 : For only REFL (remote work) -> study of nonlinearity & up/down conversion (washimi will make more detaid plan)

      • Unclear : Day 2 : For each booth (mine work) -> noise budget

    • Scattered light
      • One of the hammering test (lower priority, open the chamber and check)
      • OMC chamber vibration RMS (lower priority, open the chamber and check)
    • Line noise investigation by PEM
      • No action from DAC, SEO and noise budget team. Maybe skipped.
  • Working style (COVID-19 related)
    • We can do data analysis in your home. Let's check PEM data!
  • Useful management tools
    • Easy communication : Slack
    • Task management : GitHub

    • Software management : GitHub

    • Papers : Overleaf

Jurnal paper issue

  • KAGRA summary paper(Yokozawa) <<Almost DONE>>

    • Part of the KAGRA overview paper
    • PTEP (Overview of KAGRA : (3) Detector characterization, calibration, physical environment, and data quality)klog11664

      • Installation
      • Technical issue
  • Acoustic injection paper (Washimi) <<ON GOING>>

    • Target journal : Classical and Quantum Gravity
    • Request 3+8 hours data taking to commissioning
  • Portable PEMs (Yokozawa+) '<<Start investigation>>

    • Target journal->to be discussed later (PTEP?)

    • section
      1. Introduction
      2. Environmental noise
      3. Portable PEM1 : BNC type PEMs(Change the word)
      4. Portable PEM2 : Chromebook type
        • 4.1 USB type PEMs 4.2 Combination with Chromebook and USB tpye PEMs 4.3 Recording system and offline analysis 4.4 Vibration injection
      5. Examples of noise investigation
        • 5.1 44Hz vibration noise 5.2 Sound and vibration from air conditioner and FFU 5.3 Oshino-san, Shimode-san magnetic field with circuit 5.4 Noise investigation at OMC chamber
      6. Conclusion
  • Ground motion paper (Yokozawa+)
    • Technical note
    • Just for memo(忘備録)
    • If we can summary for special issue, we will start the discussion for journal paper
      • Lock loss study by earthquake
      • Micro-seismic motion
      • Seasonal ground motion
      • Newtonian noise
      • Baseline compensation
      • Human activity and its effect
      • etc.
  • PEM summary note (Yokozawa+)
    • Just for memo, technical note
    • What we did toward the observation
    • If we can summary for special issue, we will start the discussion for journal paper
      • PEM map
      • Lock loss study
      • Scattered light
      • etc.
  • Acoustic reverberation paper (Washimi+Virgo)
    • KAGRA data & Virgo data

    • need more analysis (March data in Virgo)
  • Magnetic field paper (Washimi+)
    • Target journal->to be discussed later

    • section
      1. Introduction
      2. 1-year Geomagnetism in underground
      3. 1-year Schumann resonance in underground
      4. Mag. field in EXC chamber
      5. Coherence between PRFPMI and MAGs
      6. Lightning effect on PRFPMI (3/22 event)
      7. Conclusion
  • Other topic
    • If you have interested in, please contact to Yokozawa and Washimi first
    • We took many environmental data
      • Six Seismometer(Miyo+)
      • Many microphones and accelerometers(Yokozawa+)
      • Weather vs environment
      • Temperature vs suspension
      • Earthquake vs magnetic-field
      • Non linearity noise study
      • Line noise investigation(Yokozawa+)
      • ICA analysis for E-run/O3GK (Kume, Yokoyama)

Preparation for O3c / O4

Place for memo

KAGRA/Subgroups/PEM/Meeting/200604/Agenda (last edited 2020-06-05 09:27:10 by TakaakiYokozawa)