Differences between revisions 32 and 48 (spanning 16 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 32 as of 2020-09-23 17:51:50 →
Size: 1790
Editor: KousekiMiyo
Comment:
← Revision 48 as of 2020-09-24 18:24:48 → ⇥
Size: 1811
Editor: KousekiMiyo
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
{{https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/DocDB/0120/E2012025/003/VISworkflow-Overview.png|WorkFlow|width=600}} [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=12025| Flow chart for the acceptance check ]]

{{https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/DocDB/0120/E2012025/004/VISworkflow.png|WorkFlow|width=600}}
Line 10: Line 12:
=== A01 : Could the simulation satisfy the requirement? ===
==== Input ====
KAGRA requirements
  * design sensitivity
  * DAC limit. 		=== A01 : Simulation satisfy the requirement? ===
 * {i}　Please write
Line 16: Line 15:
Suspension model
 * plant model : rigid body model by SUMCON
 * control model : LTI model by Matlab simlink
 * noise model : seismic noise, control noise

==== Content ====


==== Output ====
 *
Line 30: Line 19:
=== B01 === === B01 : Tower is ready to combine? ===
Line 46: Line 35:
=== B02 ===
 * Please write
  * aaaa		 === B02 : Payload is ready to combine? ===
 * {i}　Please write
Line 50: Line 38:
=== B03 ===
 * Please write
  * aaaa		 === B03 : Can we measure the TF in air? ===
 * {i}　Please write
Line 54: Line 41:
=== B04 ===
 * Please write
  * aaaa

== C: Integration phase ==
[[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=xxx|Check sheets templates for C]]

=== C01 ===		 === B04 : Can we measure the TF in vacuum? ===
Line 67: Line 47:

== C: Integration phase ==
[[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=xxx|Check sheets templates for C]]

=== C01 : Can we control the suspension in local? ===
Line 72: Line 57:
=== C02 === === C02 : Can we control the suspension in global? ===

Contents

  1. Acceptance Test
    1. Flow chart
    2. A: Design phase
      1. A01 : Simulation satisfy the requirement?
    3. B: Installation phase
      1. B01 : Tower is ready to combine?
      2. B02 : Payload is ready to combine?
      3. B03 : Can we measure the TF in air?
      4. B04 : Can we measure the TF in vacuum?
    4. C: Integration phase
      1. C01 : Can we control the suspension in local?
      2. C02 : Can we control the suspension in global?

Acceptance Test

Flow chart

Flow chart for the acceptance check

WorkFlow

A: Design phase

Check sheets templates for A

A01 : Simulation satisfy the requirement?

  • {i}　Please write

B: Installation phase

Check sheets templates for B

B01 : Tower is ready to combine?

  • Cable connection
    • Resistance (Ohom)
    • Continuity (OK/NO)
  • Calibration (LVDT, ACC)
    • Calibration (plot, polarity, coefficient)
    • Sensor noise (plot)
  • Working point and dynamic range with FR, Limit SW
    • Range (from -mm to +mm)
    • Minimum range (mm)
    • Optimal point (mm)
    • Limit SW (on/off)
  • Tuned frequencies of GAS Filter/IP
    • Frequency (TF, actuator efficiency)
    • Maximum frequency (Hz)

B02 : Payload is ready to combine?

  • {i}　Please write

B03 : Can we measure the TF in air?

  • {i}　Please write

B04 : Can we measure the TF in vacuum?

  • Damping time
    • RMS in spectrum (plot)
  • Healthy check
    • Transfer function (plot)
    • Resonant frequencies (PreQUA)

C: Integration phase

Check sheets templates for C

C01 : Can we control the suspension in local?

  • Noise budget
    • Spectrum (plot)
  • Automation
    • check the guardian transition

C02 : Can we control the suspension in global?

  • Please write
    • aaaa

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/Acceptance Test (last edited 2020-12-04 11:38:31 by KousekiMiyo)