Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2009-06-08 03:23:10
Size: 1204
Editor: whitehole
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2012-06-06 17:47:21
Size: 1257
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from LCGT/subgroup/vis/tama_sas

List to be improved from TAMA SAS experiments

o Inverted Pendulum

  • Cabling problem: Mechanical loss of the inverted pendulum is dominated by that of the cabling.
  • Due to the loss, the IPs are over-damped and are spoiled its performance less than 1 Hz region.

o Active damping for vertical motions

  • Because vertical sensors are no good with signal-to-noise ratio, any vertical active damping controls are not available.

o Local sensors

  • Both of LVDT and Accerelometer (ACC) have larger noise levels than these of designed.
  • Cabling tests including vacuum one are necessary for LCGT.

o Initial alignemnts

  • Most of pico-motor actuators are not operated properly.
  • (Need an actuator list of TAMA SAS with operation check)
  • Mechanical clearances and the related actuation ranges should be consistent.
  • Coil actuator for vertical position adjustment is not available.

o Magnet damping

  • Intermidiate mass of the double pendulum part is over damped.
  • Mechanical Q values should be less than several hundred, even if active damping controls are applied.

o Design Policy

  • As typical seismic spectrum the worst one should be adopted.

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/FEM/tama_sas (last edited 2012-06-06 17:47:21 by OsamuMiyakawa)