Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2015-08-06 06:25:52
Size: 2580
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2015-08-06 06:37:32
Size: 3857
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
* iKAGRA installation === iKAGRA installation ===
Line 36: Line 36:
* TAMA experiment === TAMA experiment ===
Line 45: Line 45:
* Preparation status of the iKAGRA large suspensions === Preparation status of the iKAGRA large suspensions ===
Line 52: Line 52:

=== Tyep-Bp temporary damper ===
 * Simulation by Soda-san
  * http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeBp
  * Adding OSEMs on the BF to actively damp it seems the best solution
  * '''Need to check the required force to damp the suspension (Shoda)'''
  * Fixing the BF to the traverser is another option. It has performance degradation.

 * Feasibility check of the modifications by Mark
  * http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=3467
  * Easiest one seems rigidly connecting the bottom filter to the traverser.
  * Adding OSEMs are relatively easy. However, moving range of the BF for alignment will be severely limited by the exisitence of the OSEMs.
  * If we use reflective photo-sensors instead of OSEM, we may be able to increase the adjustment range ?

 * What to do for the temporary damper
  * Option 1: Do nothing. We may be able to lock iKAGRA with 5um/sec RMS. Need more considerations.
  * Option 2: Do the imobilization of the BF for iKAGRA. Change it to a better one for bKAGRA if necessary.
  * Option 3: Add OSEMs to the BF if we come up with a good idea to keep the adjustment range of the BF.
  * '''We should decide on the strategy by the next VIS meeting'''

KAGRA VIS Meeting

2015/8/5 15:00 - 17:00

First Meeting Room of NAOJ

TV conference: 133.40.2.230

SeeVogh: KAGRA VIS

Participants

Shoda, Hirata, Sekiguchi, Fujii, Tatsumi, Mark, Fabian, Akutsu, Ohishi

Discussion

iKAGRA installation

  • Schedule
  • Installation Review
    • We should have a review meeting on the whole installation procedure of Type-Bp suspension early next week
    • Aso will circulate a Doodle poll
    • The meeting should be about glueing (Tatsumi), IM assembly (Shoda), mirror hanging (Fabian's document), and everything else (Mark).
  • Payload test hanging at Mitaka
    • We may want to do it in the clean room for BF assembly.
    • Put a bread board on a table there ? Using shims to level the bread board ?
    • Spare mirror glueing will finish on 8/19. The test assembly can start on 8/24 ?
    • Shoda-san will take charge of this with help from Fabian and students.

TAMA experiment

  • Current status
    • Alignment control of the prototype suspension with an optical lever was successful. But not so stable.
    • RM pitch mode around 5Hz is a problem. Could use the RM magnetic damper -> Sekiguchi-kun will try it.

    • Changing the RM wire to thin ones will reduce the resonant frequency of the pitch which makes the control even more difficult.
    • We probably need to keep using Tungsten wires (higher elestic constant).
    • We should buy Tungsten wires with several different diameters and try winding with winches to determine the thickness of the wires (thickest possible one).
    • Shoda-san will buy Tungsten wires after consulting with Takahashi-san.

Preparation status of the iKAGRA large suspensions

  • Cables
    • Review of the cabling plan made by Mark should take place in this week at Mitaka.

  • OSEM
    • Waiting for parts to arrive: Expected delivery Aug. 23rd. Assebly and calibration will follow. OSEMs will be ready early September.
    • Satellite box: Talking with AEL group about current limiting resistor.
    • Got a high power coil driver from AEL

Tyep-Bp temporary damper

  • Simulation by Soda-san
  • Feasibility check of the modifications by Mark
    • http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=3467

    • Easiest one seems rigidly connecting the bottom filter to the traverser.
    • Adding OSEMs are relatively easy. However, moving range of the BF for alignment will be severely limited by the exisitence of the OSEMs.
    • If we use reflective photo-sensors instead of OSEM, we may be able to increase the adjustment range ?
  • What to do for the temporary damper
    • Option 1: Do nothing. We may be able to lock iKAGRA with 5um/sec RMS. Need more considerations.
    • Option 2: Do the imobilization of the BF for iKAGRA. Change it to a better one for bKAGRA if necessary.
    • Option 3: Add OSEMs to the BF if we come up with a good idea to keep the adjustment range of the BF.
    • We should decide on the strategy by the next VIS meeting

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ/20150805 (last edited 2015-08-06 06:37:32 by YoichiAso)