Differences between revisions 119 and 181 (spanning 62 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 119 as of 2017-01-20 13:49:48 →
Size: 1228
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
← Revision 181 as of 2017-08-26 11:55:29 → ⇥
Size: 2037
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Hirata-san:
  * Updated the 3D assembly model for BS (among other issues, it turned out that parts were not correctly mated near where the suspension sits on the hydraulic jacks in the tank).
  * Liaised with IJECT.
  * Made an inventory for Type B (BS and SR).
  * Packed and shipped second winch to Kamioka.
  * Packed some jigs for adjusting BF blades.
  * Attended NINS information security seminar.
  * Attended the public hearing for the Opt-IR Research Division Chief Election.
 * Mark, Fabian, Enzo
  * Cabled IM picos and used IM yaw pico for adjusting RM. (Later, a wire broke at the connector, disabling the IM yaw, but we were able to continue by manually rotting the pic.)
  * Helped Takahashi-san in adjusting BF.
  * Initial round of adjustment made transverse perfect but overshot in longitudinal and made vertical unstable.
  * Second round of adjustment made vertical stable but left longitudinal offset.
  * Concluded that we can probably manage without bringing the BF back to Mitaka, but it will take some careful surveying of the existing offset and several more days of adjustment.		 === Type B (Mark) ===
==== Past week report ====
At Kamioka (Mark, Ohishi-san, Enzo, Yoshioka-kun):
 * We installed the cut-down ballast mass under the IM and tweaked the IM height and balance.
 * We checked the range of the BF FR.
 * We adjusted the BF yoke by 2.5 mm to make it give ≈0 output for nominal height.
 * We found a good gain setting for the LVDT driver and calibrated the BF LVDT.
 * We set up the optical sensors facing the RM.
 * We assembled the IRM (with OSEMs) around the IM and got it mostly adjusted.
 * We changed the k1visbs model to restore the as-designed mapping of OSEMs to DAQ channels.
 * We confirmed that the BF LVDT actuation coil and the TM OSEM coils were working.
 * We connected up the IRM OSEMs (with the new Type 5-1.7 cables) but found there was an electrical issue: all the OSEMs are reading back the same constant value, around 1115.
 * We left the suspension in a state suitable for TFs from BF GAS actuation to sensing (in vertical) and from RM OSEM actuation to the optical sensors (in horizontal) over the weekend.
At Mitaka (Hirata-san):
 * He got quotes for the SR assembly frame and did cost-reduction negotiations with Aso-san and Mirapro.
got quotes for assembly frame.
 * He did 2D drawings and a parts list for the divided LBB dampers.
 * He contacted a company about SDC.
 * He made a 3D model and drawings for the SR wire clamps.

==== Plan for week of 8/28 ====
Kamioka: Mark (except Tue), Ohishi-san, Fabian (except Tue), Enzo (except Tue), Hirata-san, Yoshioka-kun (Fri), Kozu-kun (Thu, Fri).
 * Fix/adjust IRM OSEMs.
 * Add BF cap; cable and test BF-1 and BF-2 picos.
 * Lift and weigh BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS; adjust ballast mass.
 * Crane in SF.
 * Suspend BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.

==== Plan for week of 9/4 ====
 * Install SF cap; route cables.
 * Lift and weigh SF/BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.
 * Adjust SF ballast.

==== Vacation Info ====
Mark: TBD Mid-Oct

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Past week report

At Kamioka (Mark, Ohishi-san, Enzo, Yoshioka-kun):

  • We installed the cut-down ballast mass under the IM and tweaked the IM height and balance.
  • We checked the range of the BF FR.
  • We adjusted the BF yoke by 2.5 mm to make it give ≈0 output for nominal height.
  • We found a good gain setting for the LVDT driver and calibrated the BF LVDT.
  • We set up the optical sensors facing the RM.
  • We assembled the IRM (with OSEMs) around the IM and got it mostly adjusted.
  • We changed the k1visbs model to restore the as-designed mapping of OSEMs to DAQ channels.
  • We confirmed that the BF LVDT actuation coil and the TM OSEM coils were working.
  • We connected up the IRM OSEMs (with the new Type 5-1.7 cables) but found there was an electrical issue: all the OSEMs are reading back the same constant value, around 1115.
  • We left the suspension in a state suitable for TFs from BF GAS actuation to sensing (in vertical) and from RM OSEM actuation to the optical sensors (in horizontal) over the weekend.

At Mitaka (Hirata-san):

  • He got quotes for the SR assembly frame and did cost-reduction negotiations with Aso-san and Mirapro.

got quotes for assembly frame.

  • He did 2D drawings and a parts list for the divided LBB dampers.
  • He contacted a company about SDC.
  • He made a 3D model and drawings for the SR wire clamps.

Plan for week of 8/28

Kamioka: Mark (except Tue), Ohishi-san, Fabian (except Tue), Enzo (except Tue), Hirata-san, Yoshioka-kun (Fri), Kozu-kun (Thu, Fri).

  • Fix/adjust IRM OSEMs.
  • Add BF cap; cable and test BF-1 and BF-2 picos.
  • Lift and weigh BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS; adjust ballast mass.
  • Crane in SF.
  • Suspend BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.

Plan for week of 9/4

  • Install SF cap; route cables.
  • Lift and weigh SF/BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.
  • Adjust SF ballast.

Vacation Info

Mark: TBD Mid-Oct

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)