Differences between revisions 160 and 217 (spanning 57 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 160 as of 2017-06-30 13:26:16 →
Size: 2079
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
← Revision 217 as of 2018-01-19 13:48:30 → ⇥
Size: 1817
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
==== Past week report ====
At Kamioka (Mark, Enzo, Simon, Type Bp team):
 * Mark remade the BF pico adapter cable which was poorly made and had also been damaged.
 * The Type Bp team tided up the BS rack and made new labels for many cables (thanks!).
 * Enzo connected up the in-air cables for the picos and steppers.
 * Mark and Enzo renumbered the PI LVDTs, geophones and LVDTs to make a consistent scheme working anticlockwise.
 * Enzo and Mark debugged all the cables. The only problem we couldn't solve was that the actuator coil for PI LVDT #0 is open-circuit at the connector on the LVDT. (It has been intermittent but worked before the craning.) We may have to redo the connector or replace the LVDT. Limited TFs will be possible in the next week.
 * Simon set up the LSOL and was easily able to get a return beam from the mirror on the dummy BS.
 * Shoda-san copied over the LSOL section of the PR3 real-time model into the BS model and made other improvements (thanks!).
 * Mark brought home		 ==== Report for week of 1/15 ====
 * We set up the QPD for the OL, initialized the OL and TM sections of the RTM, and did TFs from the TM OSEMs to the OL.
 * Initially we had no coherence, but we debugged issues with the watchdog, LPCD, and DAC board and then got good TFs.
 * We lifted the IM/RM/SR with the load gauge adapter and checked the weight, which was close to the mass budget.
 * We installed the section of the AF above the IM, and the BF cross bars and jacks, and craned in the BF.
 * We installed the BF-IRM rods, IRM, BF-IM rod, flying saucer and the cable clamps on the bottom of the BF.
 * We hooked the IM section, but found it was heavy by several hundred grams. We also noticed the BF keystone had a noticeable tilt of about 1.2 mm (high on the +X side).
 * We removed 738 g of trim mass and found that load rose and sat about 2 mm high. So the discrepancy is of order 500-600 g.
 * Shoda-san, Enzo and Kozu-kun made and characterized a batch of OSEMs.
 * Hirata-san finished drawings for the improved BS PI yaw/vertical adjustment, placed orders for damping ring receptacles and other items, and prepared the second SR BF in case we needed to swap it in.
 
==== Plan for week of 1/22 ====
 * Fix or swap BF.
 * Route selected cables to flange.
 * Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.
Line 17: Line 22:
At Mitaka (Fabian, Hirata-san):
 * Fabian finished designing final trim masses for IM/BF/SF for the final hang of the BS and passed it to Hirata-san to make drawings and get quotes.
 * Hirata-san requested quotes for the replaceable-jaw version of the BS wire clamps.
 * Fabian and Hirata-san gathered needed items for the BS prism/flag gluing.
 * Hirata-san designed receptacles for the new rods with 8 mm heads and requested quotes.		 ==== Plan for week of 1/29 ====
 * Enzo at Mitaka 1/29 and most of 1/30, then vacation.
 * Kozu-kun away.
 * All others at Kamioka.
 * Build IRM around IM.
 * Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
 * Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.
Line 23: Line 30:
==== Plan for week of 7/3 ====
 * Do prism/flag gluing on real BS at Kashiwa (whole team).
 * Do new 3D CAD (Hirata-san):
  * SR2 on BS assembly frame. (Adjust jack positions if possible, or leave for Fabian/Mark to do.)
  * Final BS build, SS/PI/SF as for Test Hang but with BF/IRM/IM/BS/RM down rotated back to original direction.
   * On-assembly-frame version. (Adjust jack positions if possible, or leave for Mark to do.)
   * In-tank version.
 *
==== Plan for week of 7/10 ====		 ==== Vacation Info ====
 * Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
 * Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 1/15

  • We set up the QPD for the OL, initialized the OL and TM sections of the RTM, and did TFs from the TM OSEMs to the OL.
  • Initially we had no coherence, but we debugged issues with the watchdog, LPCD, and DAC board and then got good TFs.
  • We lifted the IM/RM/SR with the load gauge adapter and checked the weight, which was close to the mass budget.
  • We installed the section of the AF above the IM, and the BF cross bars and jacks, and craned in the BF.
  • We installed the BF-IRM rods, IRM, BF-IM rod, flying saucer and the cable clamps on the bottom of the BF.
  • We hooked the IM section, but found it was heavy by several hundred grams. We also noticed the BF keystone had a noticeable tilt of about 1.2 mm (high on the +X side).
  • We removed 738 g of trim mass and found that load rose and sat about 2 mm high. So the discrepancy is of order 500-600 g.
  • Shoda-san, Enzo and Kozu-kun made and characterized a batch of OSEMs.
  • Hirata-san finished drawings for the improved BS PI yaw/vertical adjustment, placed orders for damping ring receptacles and other items, and prepared the second SR BF in case we needed to swap it in.

Plan for week of 1/22

  • Fix or swap BF.
  • Route selected cables to flange.
  • Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.

Plan for week of 1/29

  • Enzo at Mitaka 1/29 and most of 1/30, then vacation.
  • Kozu-kun away.
  • All others at Kamioka.
  • Build IRM around IM.
  • Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
  • Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.

Vacation Info

  • Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
  • Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)