Differences between revisions 17 and 79 (spanning 62 versions)
Revision 17 as of 2016-05-20 12:00:56
Size: 954
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Revision 79 as of 2016-10-27 12:56:30
Size: 781
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
  * Fabian did inventory of parts/fasteners for dummy BS, RM, IM and IRM - almost all at Mitaka. A handful (picos, pico drivers) will be brought back from Kamioka.
  * Fabian continued work on Mathematica and Matlab models of the BS and control system. He now gets much better agreement after correcting discrepancies between the parameter sets.
  * Hirata-san worked on organizing:
   * Checking Mirapro assembly frame drawings
   * Ordering missing screws and small items (screws for dummy mass, fine pitch M8 for RM)
   * Work platforms and clean booth second floor arrangement.
   * Load gauge adapter and associated parts
   * Possible fall-back plans for the rods connecting the security structure to the PI.
   * Design for additional trim masses (existing design had no provision for adding/removing).
  * Fabian, Mark and Liu-kun did BS installation at Kamioka:
   * Debugged the issue with the BF keystone being tilted enough to cause rubbing on the yoke for the magnets. It was solved by moving the yoke ≈1 mm taking advantage of the oversized holes.
   * Measured the height of the payload as a function of trim mass. The BF spring seems to have a slightly lower load capacity and a rather higher spring constant than when it was remeasured by Hirata-san.
   * Removed IM trim mass to set the average height of the keystone to the CAD value.
   * Moved IM trim mass around to set the pitch of the dummy BS.
  * Hirata-san
   * TBD.
 

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

  • Type B Past Week Summary
    • Fabian, Mark and Liu-kun did BS installation at Kamioka:
      • Debugged the issue with the BF keystone being tilted enough to cause rubbing on the yoke for the magnets. It was solved by moving the yoke ≈1 mm taking advantage of the oversized holes.
      • Measured the height of the payload as a function of trim mass. The BF spring seems to have a slightly lower load capacity and a rather higher spring constant than when it was remeasured by Hirata-san.
      • Removed IM trim mass to set the average height of the keystone to the CAD value.
      • Moved IM trim mass around to set the pitch of the dummy BS.
    • Hirata-san
      • TBD.

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)