Differences between revisions 181 and 217 (spanning 36 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 181 as of 2017-08-26 11:55:29 →
Size: 2037
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
← Revision 217 as of 2018-01-19 13:48:30 → ⇥
Size: 1817
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
==== Past week report ====
At Kamioka (Mark, Ohishi-san, Enzo, Yoshioka-kun):
 * We installed the cut-down ballast mass under the IM and tweaked the IM height and balance.
 * We checked the range of the BF FR.
 * We adjusted the BF yoke by 2.5 mm to make it give ≈0 output for nominal height.
 * We found a good gain setting for the LVDT driver and calibrated the BF LVDT.
 * We set up the optical sensors facing the RM.
 * We assembled the IRM (with OSEMs) around the IM and got it mostly adjusted.
 * We changed the k1visbs model to restore the as-designed mapping of OSEMs to DAQ channels.
 * We confirmed that the BF LVDT actuation coil and the TM OSEM coils were working.
 * We connected up the IRM OSEMs (with the new Type 5-1.7 cables) but found there was an electrical issue: all the OSEMs are reading back the same constant value, around 1115.
 * We left the suspension in a state suitable for TFs from BF GAS actuation to sensing (in vertical) and from RM OSEM actuation to the optical sensors (in horizontal) over the weekend.
At Mitaka (Hirata-san):
 * He got quotes for the SR assembly frame and did cost-reduction negotiations with Aso-san and Mirapro.
got quotes for assembly frame.
 * He did 2D drawings and a parts list for the divided LBB dampers.
 * He contacted a company about SDC.
 * He made a 3D model and drawings for the SR wire clamps.		 ==== Report for week of 1/15 ====
 * We set up the QPD for the OL, initialized the OL and TM sections of the RTM, and did TFs from the TM OSEMs to the OL.
 * Initially we had no coherence, but we debugged issues with the watchdog, LPCD, and DAC board and then got good TFs.
 * We lifted the IM/RM/SR with the load gauge adapter and checked the weight, which was close to the mass budget.
 * We installed the section of the AF above the IM, and the BF cross bars and jacks, and craned in the BF.
 * We installed the BF-IRM rods, IRM, BF-IM rod, flying saucer and the cable clamps on the bottom of the BF.
 * We hooked the IM section, but found it was heavy by several hundred grams. We also noticed the BF keystone had a noticeable tilt of about 1.2 mm (high on the +X side).
 * We removed 738 g of trim mass and found that load rose and sat about 2 mm high. So the discrepancy is of order 500-600 g.
 * Shoda-san, Enzo and Kozu-kun made and characterized a batch of OSEMs.
 * Hirata-san finished drawings for the improved BS PI yaw/vertical adjustment, placed orders for damping ring receptacles and other items, and prepared the second SR BF in case we needed to swap it in.
 
==== Plan for week of 1/22 ====
 * Fix or swap BF.
 * Route selected cables to flange.
 * Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.
Line 25: Line 22:
==== Plan for week of 8/28 ====
Kamioka: Mark (except Tue), Ohishi-san, Fabian (except Tue), Enzo (except Tue), Hirata-san, Yoshioka-kun (Fri), Kozu-kun (Thu, Fri).
 * Fix/adjust IRM OSEMs.
 * Add BF cap; cable and test BF-1 and BF-2 picos.
 * Lift and weigh BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS; adjust ballast mass.
 * Crane in SF.
 * Suspend BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.

==== Plan for week of 9/4 ====
 * Install SF cap; route cables.
 * Lift and weigh SF/BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.
 * Adjust SF ballast.		 ==== Plan for week of 1/29 ====
 * Enzo at Mitaka 1/29 and most of 1/30, then vacation.
 * Kozu-kun away.
 * All others at Kamioka.
 * Build IRM around IM.
 * Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
 * Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.
Line 39: Line 31:
Mark: TBD Mid-Oct  * Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
 * Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 1/15

  • We set up the QPD for the OL, initialized the OL and TM sections of the RTM, and did TFs from the TM OSEMs to the OL.
  • Initially we had no coherence, but we debugged issues with the watchdog, LPCD, and DAC board and then got good TFs.
  • We lifted the IM/RM/SR with the load gauge adapter and checked the weight, which was close to the mass budget.
  • We installed the section of the AF above the IM, and the BF cross bars and jacks, and craned in the BF.
  • We installed the BF-IRM rods, IRM, BF-IM rod, flying saucer and the cable clamps on the bottom of the BF.
  • We hooked the IM section, but found it was heavy by several hundred grams. We also noticed the BF keystone had a noticeable tilt of about 1.2 mm (high on the +X side).
  • We removed 738 g of trim mass and found that load rose and sat about 2 mm high. So the discrepancy is of order 500-600 g.
  • Shoda-san, Enzo and Kozu-kun made and characterized a batch of OSEMs.
  • Hirata-san finished drawings for the improved BS PI yaw/vertical adjustment, placed orders for damping ring receptacles and other items, and prepared the second SR BF in case we needed to swap it in.

Plan for week of 1/22

  • Fix or swap BF.
  • Route selected cables to flange.
  • Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.

Plan for week of 1/29

  • Enzo at Mitaka 1/29 and most of 1/30, then vacation.
  • Kozu-kun away.
  • All others at Kamioka.
  • Build IRM around IM.
  • Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
  • Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.

Vacation Info

  • Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
  • Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)