Differences between revisions 183 and 217 (spanning 34 versions)
Revision 183 as of 2017-09-01 13:47:28
Size: 2134
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Revision 217 as of 2018-01-19 13:48:30
Size: 1817
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
==== Past week report ====
At Kamioka (Mark, Ohishi-san, Fabian, Enzo, Hirata-san, Yoshioka-kun, Kozu-kun):
 * We solved the problem with the OSEMs: cables had been plugged into the confusingly named "PD current monitor" outputs (actually LED current monitors), not the "OSEM outputs".
 * We solved a problem with the real-time model freezing which turned out to be the IO chassis having lost power.
 * We took some mass off the IM to allow for the weight of the cables, and readjusted it in pitch and roll.
 * We aligned the IRM to the IM and set the OSEMs to mid-range.
 * We added ballast to the BF.
 * We changed the receptacles for the SF-BF rod. The low receptacle did not fit properly into the BF keystone and Hirata-san had to file it.
 * We fixed a broken wire on the BF yaw pico, retested the pico and added the BF cap.
 * We cabled and tested the BF cap picos.
 * We lifted the BF and weighed and balanced it.
 * We installed the SF ring and brought in the SF.
 * We cabled the SF LVDT and did a quick test (not a full calibration).
 * We replaced non-vacuum compatible cables in the PI, removed various sticky labels and wiped it with ethanol.
 * We tried to hook the SF-BF rod but found the hole in the hex cable clamp was too small for the 8 mm rod head. We enlarged the hole but then found the PEEK pieces were too loose. We tried using foil, but then managed to lose a PEEK piece into the BF, so we will need to remove the cap of the BF to get it.
==== Report for week of 1/15 ====
 * We set up the QPD for the OL, initialized the OL and TM sections of the RTM, and did TFs from the TM OSEMs to the OL.
 * Initially we had no coherence, but we debugged issues with the watchdog, LPCD, and DAC board and then got good TFs.
 * We lifted the IM/RM/SR with the load gauge adapter and checked the weight, which was close to the mass budget.
 * We installed the section of the AF above the IM, and the BF cross bars and jacks, and craned in the BF.
 * We installed the BF-IRM rods, IRM, BF-IM rod, flying saucer and the cable clamps on the bottom of the BF.
 * We hooked the IM section, but found it was heavy by several hundred grams. We also noticed the BF keystone had a noticeable tilt of about 1.2 mm (high on the +X side).
 * We removed 738 g of trim mass and found that load rose and sat about 2 mm high. So the discrepancy is of order 500-600 g.
 * Shoda-san, Enzo and Kozu-kun made and characterized a batch of OSEMs.
 * Hirata-san finished drawings for the improved BS PI yaw/vertical adjustment, placed orders for damping ring receptacles and other items, and prepared the second SR BF in case we needed to swap it in.
 
==== Plan for week of 1/22 ====
 * Fix or swap BF.
 * Route selected cables to flange.
 * Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.
Line 22: Line 22:
==== Plan for week of 8/28 ====
Kamioka: Mark (except Tue), Ohishi-san, Fabian (except Tue), Enzo (except Tue), Hirata-san, Yoshioka-kun (Fri), Kozu-kun (Thu, Fri).
 * Fix/adjust IRM OSEMs.
 * Add BF cap; cable and test BF-1 and BF-2 picos.
 * Lift and weigh BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS; adjust ballast mass.
 * Crane in SF.
 * Suspend BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.

==== Plan for week of 9/4 ====
 * Install SF cap; route cables.
 * Lift and weigh SF/BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS.
 * Adjust SF ballast.
==== Plan for week of 1/29 ====
 * Enzo at Mitaka 1/29 and most of 1/30, then vacation.
 * Kozu-kun away.
 * All others at Kamioka.
 * Build IRM around IM.
 * Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
 * Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.
Line 36: Line 31:
Mark: TBD Mid-Oct  * Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
 * Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 1/15

  • We set up the QPD for the OL, initialized the OL and TM sections of the RTM, and did TFs from the TM OSEMs to the OL.
  • Initially we had no coherence, but we debugged issues with the watchdog, LPCD, and DAC board and then got good TFs.
  • We lifted the IM/RM/SR with the load gauge adapter and checked the weight, which was close to the mass budget.
  • We installed the section of the AF above the IM, and the BF cross bars and jacks, and craned in the BF.
  • We installed the BF-IRM rods, IRM, BF-IM rod, flying saucer and the cable clamps on the bottom of the BF.
  • We hooked the IM section, but found it was heavy by several hundred grams. We also noticed the BF keystone had a noticeable tilt of about 1.2 mm (high on the +X side).
  • We removed 738 g of trim mass and found that load rose and sat about 2 mm high. So the discrepancy is of order 500-600 g.
  • Shoda-san, Enzo and Kozu-kun made and characterized a batch of OSEMs.
  • Hirata-san finished drawings for the improved BS PI yaw/vertical adjustment, placed orders for damping ring receptacles and other items, and prepared the second SR BF in case we needed to swap it in.

Plan for week of 1/22

  • Fix or swap BF.
  • Route selected cables to flange.
  • Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.

Plan for week of 1/29

  • Enzo at Mitaka 1/29 and most of 1/30, then vacation.
  • Kozu-kun away.
  • All others at Kamioka.
  • Build IRM around IM.
  • Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
  • Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.

Vacation Info

  • Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
  • Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)