|
Size: 1557
Comment:
|
Size: 3427
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| ==== Past week report ==== * Mark created screens and a macro.txt file for the SR2 and linked to them from the VIS screen. * Enzo and Mark did a new overview screen for the BS. * Enzo added DIO cards to the rack and connected them to the coil drivers. * Fabian and Kozu-kun finished assembling the IM and tested the picos over their full range. * Mark and Hirata-san configured and aligned the assembly frame and optical table and craned in the IM ring. * Hirata-san noticed some oxidization on several of the L-brackets that will hold the IM horizontally, and we should get them cleaned or machined, but we can probably continue with hanging the system in the meantime. |
==== Report for week of 5/7 ==== * We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break. * The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much. * We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force. * None of the screws showed any signs of damage. * All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down. * We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length). * We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF. * We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM. * We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing. * We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load. * Mirapro installed the SRM mushroom. |
| Line 14: | Line 19: |
| ==== Plan for week of 5/14 ==== * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka. * Weigh IM/... section. * Characterize F0 blade prototypes. * Remove F0 blade prototypes (and send for rework if necessary). * Start characterizing LBB blades. * Crane in BF. * Add IRM top plate, maraging rod, flying saucer. * Suspend IM, check pitch, roll and vertical, adjust trim mass. * Cable and (re-)test TM OSEMs, IM picos, BF yaw pico, BF LVDT and FR. |
|
| Line 15: | Line 30: |
| ==== Plan for week of 12/25 ==== * Power outage 12/25. * Mark, Enzo, Fabian vacation * Shoda-san, Kozu-kun, Hirata-san at Kamioka - Hirata-san from Tue, others TBD. * Recover after power outage. * Create SR2 real-time model. * Install new jack receptacles (in SR3 area, second floor) on load gauge adapter (SR2 area, second floor). (Hirata-san) * Weigh IM (per Fabian's note in the paper log). * Remove L-brackets from bars on IM ring - send for cleaning/remachining. * Setup OL for checking pitch of SR. * Wipe/blow dust off SR2 frame. * Crane IM into frame. |
==== Plan for week of 5/21 ==== * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri. * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri. * Install IRM sides, and IM OSEMs. * Center IM OSEMs (in/out and laterally) * Route all cables to underneath BF. * Add BF internal ballast mass. * Add BF cap. |
| Line 28: | Line 39: |
| ==== Plan for week of 1/9 ==== * Mark, Fabian, Enzo, Shoda-san at Kamioka Tue-Fri. * Hang SR and RM. |
==== Plan for week of 5/28 ==== * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri. * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only. * TBD. ==== To-Do Lists, Schedule ==== * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/March2018]] * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/April2018]] * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoBS]] * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoSR]] * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=7779|JGW-L1807779-v1 Type B Schedule (SR)]] |
| Line 33: | Line 51: |
| * Enzo 1/30-2/19 |
Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes
KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ
Type B (Mark)
Report for week of 5/7
- We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
- The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
- We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
- None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
- All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
- We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
- We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
- We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
- We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
- We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
- Mirapro installed the SRM mushroom.
Plan for week of 5/14
- Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
- Weigh IM/... section.
- Characterize F0 blade prototypes.
- Remove F0 blade prototypes (and send for rework if necessary).
- Start characterizing LBB blades.
- Crane in BF.
- Add IRM top plate, maraging rod, flying saucer.
- Suspend IM, check pitch, roll and vertical, adjust trim mass.
- Cable and (re-)test TM OSEMs, IM picos, BF yaw pico, BF LVDT and FR.
Plan for week of 5/21
- Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
- Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.
- Install IRM sides, and IM OSEMs.
- Center IM OSEMs (in/out and laterally)
- Route all cables to underneath BF.
- Add BF internal ballast mass.
- Add BF cap.
Plan for week of 5/28
- Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
- Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
- TBD.
To-Do Lists, Schedule