Differences between revisions 226 and 283 (spanning 57 versions)
Revision 226 as of 2018-02-02 10:26:54
Size: 2003
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Revision 283 as of 2018-05-11 11:35:38
Size: 2841
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
==== Report for week of 1/29 ====
 * We moved the top filter intended for SR2 (#1) into the SR3 cleanbooth.
 * Unfortunately we noticed one of the blades had many small X-shaped stress fractures on the top surface (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4058|4058]]).
 * We moved the top filter entered for SR3 (#3) into the SRM cleanbooth and inspected the blades. Two had one smallish stress fracture each and one had a huge fracture and looks close to failing (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4061|4061]]).
 * We referred the BS OL.
 * We removed the BS tank lid and inspected the BS top filter blades. They seemed fine (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4073|4073]]).
 * Hirata-san received and washed some ferromagnetic disks for IM flags and other small parts.
 * Hirata-san moved the BF with the tilted keystone (#1) out of the cleanbooth in preparation for rebuilding.
 * Hirata-san placed the second order for payload parts, and an order for remachining of nuts for cable clamps on rods.
 * Fabian measured the gain of the ADC system (homework from the Commissioning Workshop).
 
==== Plan for week of 2/5 ====
Enzo on vacation; all others at Kamioka.
 * Make in-air pico adapter cables.
 * Calibrate LVDT.
 * Test IM picos and BF yaw pico.
 * Test FR.
 * Install ballast mass in BF.
 * Build IRM around IM.
 * Cable/test/adjust IM OSEMs.
 * Time permitting, do TFs from IM OSEMs to themselves and to optical sensor.
==== Report for week of 5/7 ====
 * We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
  * The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
  * We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
  * None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
  * All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
 * We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
 * We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
 * We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
 * We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
 * We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
Line 28: Line 18:
==== Plan for week of 2/13 ====
 * No work Monday (建国記念の日の振替休日)<<BR>>
 * Enzo on vacation
 * Hirata-san at Mitaka Tue, Wed (to receive and wash parts).
 * All others at Kamioka.
 * -
 * Lift BF/IM/IRM/RM/TM and check total mass and balance.
 * Test BF picos.
==== Plan for week of 5/14 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
Line 38: Line 22:
==== Plan for week of 5/21 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.

==== Plan for week of 5/28 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
 
==== To-Do Lists, Schedule ====
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/March2018]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/April2018]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoBS]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoSR]]
 * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=7779|JGW-L1807779-v1 Type B Schedule (SR)]]
Line 39: Line 38:
 * Enzo 1/30-2/19 (at Mitaka 1/29, part of 1/30)
 * Kozu-kun 1/29-2/2

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 5/7

  • We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
    • The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
    • We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
    • None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
    • All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
  • We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
  • We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
  • We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
  • We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
  • We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.

Plan for week of 5/14

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.

Plan for week of 5/21

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.

Plan for week of 5/28

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.

To-Do Lists, Schedule

Vacation Info

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)