Differences between revisions 256 and 284 (spanning 28 versions)
Revision 256 as of 2018-03-23 11:33:41
Size: 1929
Editor: EnzoTapia
Comment:
Revision 284 as of 2018-05-11 12:58:39
Size: 3427
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
==== Report for week of 3/19 ====
 * Fujii-kun successfully assembled and tested a geophone pod (klogs 4492, 4508).
 * Hirata-san set up the dummy BS to soak off the sapphire prisms. (In process)
 * Shoda-san, Hirata-san and Enzo finished the assembly of 12 OSEMs. We still need to measure the maximum output (In process)
 * We will send the OSEMs to Kamioka today.
 * Enzo made 2 In-air picomotor cable.
==== Report for week of 5/7 ====
 * We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
  * The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
  * We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
  * None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
  * All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
 * We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
 * We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
 * We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
 * We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
 * We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
 * Mirapro installed the SRM mushroom.
Line 13: Line 19:
==== Plan for week of 5/14 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
 * Weigh IM/... section.
 * Characterize F0 blade prototypes.
 * Remove F0 blade prototypes (and send for rework if necessary).
 * Start characterizing LBB blades.
 * Crane in BF.
 * Add IRM top plate, maraging rod, flying saucer.
 * Suspend IM, check pitch, roll and vertical, adjust trim mass.
 * Cable and (re-)test TM OSEMs, IM picos, BF yaw pico, BF LVDT and FR.
Line 14: Line 30:
==== Plan for week of 5/21 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.
 * Install IRM sides, and IM OSEMs.
 * Center IM OSEMs (in/out and laterally)
 * Route all cables to underneath BF.
 * Add BF internal ballast mass.
 * Add BF cap.
Line 15: Line 39:
==== Plan for week of 3/26 ====
 * Tanioka-kun joins.
 * Mark vacation.
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka
 * Others at Kamioka
 * --
 * Lay SR3 in-air cabling (Enzo++).
 * Finish tuning of BFs (Hirata-san++).
 * SF check (Hirata-san++).
  * Check load capacity.
  * Check fit of caps.
  * Add cable clamps to bases.
  * Add cable clamps and Cu segments to caps (only if they fit well).
  * Cable LVDTs and steppers.

==== Plan for week of 4/2 ====
 * Mark at Mitaka Mon, Kamioka from Tue.
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka
 * Others at Kamioka
 * --
 * Glue SR3 (if available)
 * Build 2xIM, 2xIRM (if parts available - due 3/30)

==== Plan for week of 4/9 ====
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka
 * Others at Kamioka
 * --
 * Finish IMs and IRMs
 * Build 1xRM

==== Plan for week of 4/16 ====
 * Start SR3 Hang?

==== Plan for week of 4/23 ====
 * F0 blade prototype test

==== Plan for week of 4/30 ====
  * Golden Week!
==== Plan for week of 5/28 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
 * TBD.
Line 62: Line 51:
 * Mark at LVC, then vacation, 3/18 (Sun) - 4/1 (Sun)
 * Fabian vacation, 3/26-4/27 (then gone).

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 5/7

  • We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
    • The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
    • We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
    • None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
    • All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
  • We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
  • We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
  • We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
  • We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
  • We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
  • Mirapro installed the SRM mushroom.

Plan for week of 5/14

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
  • Weigh IM/... section.
  • Characterize F0 blade prototypes.
  • Remove F0 blade prototypes (and send for rework if necessary).
  • Start characterizing LBB blades.
  • Crane in BF.
  • Add IRM top plate, maraging rod, flying saucer.
  • Suspend IM, check pitch, roll and vertical, adjust trim mass.
  • Cable and (re-)test TM OSEMs, IM picos, BF yaw pico, BF LVDT and FR.

Plan for week of 5/21

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.
  • Install IRM sides, and IM OSEMs.
  • Center IM OSEMs (in/out and laterally)
  • Route all cables to underneath BF.
  • Add BF internal ballast mass.
  • Add BF cap.

Plan for week of 5/28

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
  • TBD.

To-Do Lists, Schedule

Vacation Info

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)