Differences between revisions 275 and 282 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 275 as of 2018-04-06 14:20:35
Size: 2606
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Revision 282 as of 2018-04-29 15:44:54
Size: 4129
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
==== Report for week of 4/2 ==== ==== Report for week of 4/23 ====
 * We hung the optic and set its pitch. The winch system had a lot of slop in it but the technique of relaxing the wires by lifting the optic on the EQ stops was effective in getting consistent results.
 * We tightened the clamps using a torque wrench, using settings of 5 N.m for the primary clamps and 20 N.m for the secondary.
 * We hung the RM and set its pitch. The RM winches were a lot more consistent.
 * However when tightening the clamps, the wire on the +Y side broke at the bottom edge of primary clamp. The wire on the -Y held, so the RM dropped a few mm onto the trolley on the +Y side.
 * We raised the RM trolley to support the RM and left the optic hanging inside it overnight as a safety test.
 * We then reversed the usual installation procedure to remove the RM and get the mirror box around the optic. We used clamp pieces as spacers to bridge the gaps created by the fact that the optic had been raised 3 mm during hanging and could not safely be lowered. We then cut the wires, leaving the op
 * Shoda-san made SRM model (Dropbox/Largefiles/Subsystems/VIS/Design/SR/Model/SRM-MetalMass_180426)
 * Shoda-san made 2D drawings of LBB ballast masses
 * Hirata-san washed parts.
==== Control Issues ====
 * Resonant frequency table is ready for BS ([[http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/BSdetail|BS suspension details]])
 * We found the inconsistency between local damping measurement and interferometer measurement. ([[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4811|klog4811]])
  The TF gains from IML to TML, and from TML to TML are different from the interferometer measurement.
Line 8: Line 21:
 * Fujii-kun and Yamamoto-kun got the SR3 real time model running.
 * We received the SR3.
 * However Mark and Tanioka-kun found Hirose-san had applied the First Contact patterns on the wrong sides, so we took it to Yamamoto-san's lab and Toyama University and re-applied the FC properly. We also bounced a 1064 nm beam off it to verify that the HR and AR coatings were not also swapped (they were OK).
 * We made magnet-standoff assemblies for both SR3 and SRM, and set up for gluing the prisms and magnets. We will attach the prisms and magnet-standoffs on Monday.
 * Hirata-san did inventory of the SR3/SRM payload parts received last week and started on the inventory of screws.
 * Fujii-kun, Enzo and team finished the preparation, adjustment of the SFs and BFs.
 * They calibrated one SF and BF. (The remaining one SF and BF will take about another day. Also, the FR stops need to be checked.)
 * Enzo and Kozu-kun finished setting up the SR3 and SRM racks. (The SRM rack still lacks a front-end, and power and network connections, but the SR3 is now ready for testing.)
 * Shoda-san worked on getting quotes for the ballast masses, on design of the SRM metal mass, and on splitting the BS model to reduce the load on the front-end computer.
  * I checked the TML gain, which are calculated from TMP and TMY measurements, and found EUL2COIL matrix was different from what I supposed.
   --> Fixed it and updated the state space model. Might be OK now for TF from TML to TML. (Komori-kun will check it.)
  * I checked the calibration gain of OSEMs and found that the measured values are not used. But it makes only small difference.
  * Compare the TFs from BFGAS to BFGAS and BFGAS to IMV, and they are inconsistent for BS and PR2. (No data found for PR3)([[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=4807|klog4807]])
  * Comparing TFs from IMP to TMP and from IMY to TMY also helps to check the OSEM calibration by comparing OSEM signals and Oplev signals.
   Found the matrix to convert OSEM signals (um) to pitch (urad) is different from what I calculated. To be checked.
   The measurement will be done after phase-I.
Line 18: Line 29:
==== Plan for week of 4/9 ====
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka
 * Fujii-san at Mitaka
 * Tanioka-san at Kamioka, but possibly doing PEM stuff.
 * Others at Kamioka
 * --
 * Finish SRM BF and SF calibration
 * Finish IMs and IRMs
 * Glue SR3 mirror

==== Plan for week of 4/16 ====
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka
 * Fujii-san at Mitaka
 * Tanioka-san at Mitaka?
 * Others at Kamioka
 * --
 * Build 1xRM
 * Start SR3 Hang
  * Align assembly frame.

==== Plan for week of 4/23 ====
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka
 * Fujii-san at Mitaka?
 * Mark, Enzo at Kamioka
 * Hirata-san at Mitaka
 * Tanioka-san at Mitaka?
 * --
 * Clean parts (cable clamp bases, etc, etc).
 * Observe KAGRA Phase 1 operations, assist if problems arise.
 * Constructing the tool to implement the current filterbank information to state space model.
Line 49: Line 32:
  * Golden Week!  * Shoda-san at Mitaka.
 * Mark, Enzo at Kamioka Mon-Wed or TBD.
 * Others having fun doing Golden Week stuff.
 * --
 * Observe KAGRA Phase 1 operations, assist if problems arise.
 * Do BF TFs.

==== Plan for week of 5/7 ====
 * Shoda-san at Mitaka.
 * Enzo at Kamioka from Tue.
 * Mark, Hirata-san at Kamioka full week.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka??
 * Tanioka-kun at Kamioka Mon, Tue.
 * --
 * Continue SR3 Hang
  * Inspect clamps and decide whether to reuse or swap in clamps from SRM IM.
  * Rehang optic.
  * Rehang RM.
  * Cable RM OSEMs.
 * Prepare for filter testing
  * Remove cracked blades from F0 #1 and #3.
  * Remove floor panel in SR3 area.
  * Set up filter building trolley with crossbars, jacks and F0 test masses.
 
 * Etc
  * Test prototype SR3 safety bar, and set up second safety bar.
  * Negotiate with Mirapro to get SRM mushroom installed, avoiding 5/15.

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 4/23

  • We hung the optic and set its pitch. The winch system had a lot of slop in it but the technique of relaxing the wires by lifting the optic on the EQ stops was effective in getting consistent results.
  • We tightened the clamps using a torque wrench, using settings of 5 N.m for the primary clamps and 20 N.m for the secondary.
  • We hung the RM and set its pitch. The RM winches were a lot more consistent.
  • However when tightening the clamps, the wire on the +Y side broke at the bottom edge of primary clamp. The wire on the -Y held, so the RM dropped a few mm onto the trolley on the +Y side.
  • We raised the RM trolley to support the RM and left the optic hanging inside it overnight as a safety test.
  • We then reversed the usual installation procedure to remove the RM and get the mirror box around the optic. We used clamp pieces as spacers to bridge the gaps created by the fact that the optic had been raised 3 mm during hanging and could not safely be lowered. We then cut the wires, leaving the op
  • Shoda-san made SRM model (Dropbox/Largefiles/Subsystems/VIS/Design/SR/Model/SRM-MetalMass_180426)

  • Shoda-san made 2D drawings of LBB ballast masses
  • Hirata-san washed parts.

Control Issues

  • Resonant frequency table is ready for BS (BS suspension details)

  • We found the inconsistency between local damping measurement and interferometer measurement. (klog4811)

    • The TF gains from IML to TML, and from TML to TML are different from the interferometer measurement.
    • I checked the TML gain, which are calculated from TMP and TMY measurements, and found EUL2COIL matrix was different from what I supposed.
      • --> Fixed it and updated the state space model. Might be OK now for TF from TML to TML. (Komori-kun will check it.)

    • I checked the calibration gain of OSEMs and found that the measured values are not used. But it makes only small difference.
    • Compare the TFs from BFGAS to BFGAS and BFGAS to IMV, and they are inconsistent for BS and PR2. (No data found for PR3)(klog4807)

    • Comparing TFs from IMP to TMP and from IMY to TMY also helps to check the OSEM calibration by comparing OSEM signals and Oplev signals.
      • Found the matrix to convert OSEM signals (um) to pitch (urad) is different from what I calculated. To be checked. The measurement will be done after phase-I.
  • Constructing the tool to implement the current filterbank information to state space model.

Plan for week of 4/30

  • Shoda-san at Mitaka.
  • Mark, Enzo at Kamioka Mon-Wed or TBD.
  • Others having fun doing Golden Week stuff.
  • --
  • Observe KAGRA Phase 1 operations, assist if problems arise.
  • Do BF TFs.

Plan for week of 5/7

  • Shoda-san at Mitaka.
  • Enzo at Kamioka from Tue.
  • Mark, Hirata-san at Kamioka full week.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka??
  • Tanioka-kun at Kamioka Mon, Tue.
  • --
  • Continue SR3 Hang
    • Inspect clamps and decide whether to reuse or swap in clamps from SRM IM.
    • Rehang optic.
    • Rehang RM.
    • Cable RM OSEMs.
  • Prepare for filter testing
    • Remove cracked blades from F0 #1 and #3.
    • Remove floor panel in SR3 area.
    • Set up filter building trolley with crossbars, jacks and F0 test masses.
  • Etc
    • Test prototype SR3 safety bar, and set up second safety bar.
    • Negotiate with Mirapro to get SRM mushroom installed, avoiding 5/15.

To-Do Lists, Schedule

Vacation Info

  • Fabian vacation, 3/26-4/27 (then gone).

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)