|
Size: 2284
Comment:
|
Size: 3019
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| * Type B Past Week Summary * Mark and Fabian worked at Kamioka: * All the parts for the security structure were located. The clamp pieces for the IM are being taken back to Mitaka to have extra screw holes added. * The BS/PR2/SR2 area was cleaned and tidied to allow floor removal and assembly frame construction. * 21 "Type 1" cables (PI-Flange, Signal) and 15 "Type 5" cables (OSEM) were tested. They all passed. Sufficient tested "Type 2" cables (PI-Flange, Motor) were located in the PR3 area. * Hirata-san worked on the Inventor assembly, adding views (originally defined by Mark) of the different phases of construction. * Hirata-san shipped 7 SFs and some parts to Kamioka. * Hirata-san made assembly drawings of the damper rings and cable clamps for SR. * Hirata-san liaised with Mirapro about the frame assembly. * Type B ongoing issues * Wires * Need to decide RM wire thickness and order BS and RM wires. Lead time is a few days from Nilaco. * OSEMs * Akutsu-san is working to get wide-mouth OSEMs * Longer cables for BF->PI and SF->PI. * Takahashi-san has ordered extra connectors (due any day) and will get a company to make the cables. * Feedthrough Adapters * Need large quantity of male and female D-Sub 9, IDC ribbon connectors - Takahashi-san is getting a quote. * Can we make SR wire breakers bigger? * Fukushima-san will start on machining test soon (as of 5/27). * Installation stuff * Crane scale - RECEIVED * Ballast masses for payload * Initial batch received - ordered extra smaller ones to allow for adjustments. * Lower breadboard stuff * Installation to be incorporated into the procedure document. Mark/Takahashi to discuss. * Breadboard springs (in manufacture, expected end of July) * Nail-head parts: quote from Mirapro received, not urgent, will be combined with assembly frame order. * Documents * BS Assembly Procedure [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4235| E1504235]], [[https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D5CCFA70A378E0D0!195&authkey=!AM_usynuo9QI57g&ithint=folder,webloc|E1504235 draft]] |
* Activity report for week of 12/12 * Mark, Fabian and Enzo continued BS Test Hang work: * We shipped BS mirror box parts to Shoda-san and components for a new LVDT cable to Hirata-san. * We posed for pictures of the BS by a team from National Geographic. * We installed the BF fishing rod stepper motor adaptor cable. * We tried to install the BF LVDT cable but first we encountered trouble routing it, and then several wires broke at the D-Sub end. * We laid 6 in-air cables from the tank to the PR2 rank for BF and SF picos, steppers and LVDTs. * We lifted the BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS section to weigh it and check its balance. * It was 195.6 kg, which is 18 kg(!) less than the capacity of the SF. * There was a major imbalance in roll: with all four built-in trim masses moved up the +Y end, it still needed 270 g of extra trim mass to be level. This can probably be made up easily by designing the 18 kg of extra mass appropriately. * Unfortunately when we put the payload, the IM was slightly yawed and ended up on the horizontal EQ stop screws. This let the IM-BF maraging rod go slack, which disturbed the leveling of the IM (because every time it is picked up the maraging rod settles in a different place, giving a different suspension point). * We removed the end panels of the IRM to get access to the IM and rearranged the trim mass on the the IM to get it balance to bubble-level precision. (We still need to do fine pitch adjustment with the OL so that the BS is at the right angle, secure the trim mass properly and replace the IRM panels and OSEMs.) * Miyakawa-san and Yamamoto-san redid the cabling from the computer room to the PR2 rack and expected to finish by lunchtime on Friday. * Hirata-san * Did parts and fastener lists for the SR payload. * Did a 3D model with the SR suspension on the BS assembly frame (to help Mark make adjustments to the frame design). * Did 2D drawings of Fabian's concept for BS EQ stop parts. * Did a 3D model of a wire clamp with replaceable jaw parts (to avoid having to reuse parts with scars from pressure). * Did 2D drawings of a new wire clamps for on top of the BS and SR RMs. * BF issue * The BF has three issues that may or may not be related: * The keystone is sitting at an angle, which means: * The bottom of the keystone just barely clears the magnet yoke without rubbing. * The suspension point for the IM rod is offset, so the BF does not hang level, even with all built-in trim masses moved to their limits (an additional 270 g stacked on the +Y side of the cap is required). * The load capacity is slightly less than measured by Hirata-san during tuning at the ATC. * The frequency is rather higher than measured by Hirata-san. * Also, the BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS system is 18.1 kg light (195.6 kg) compared to the load capacity of the SF (213.7 kg). |
Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes
KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ
- Activity report for week of 12/12
- Mark, Fabian and Enzo continued BS Test Hang work:
- We shipped BS mirror box parts to Shoda-san and components for a new LVDT cable to Hirata-san.
- We posed for pictures of the BS by a team from National Geographic.
- We installed the BF fishing rod stepper motor adaptor cable.
- We tried to install the BF LVDT cable but first we encountered trouble routing it, and then several wires broke at the D-Sub end.
- We laid 6 in-air cables from the tank to the PR2 rank for BF and SF picos, steppers and LVDTs.
- We lifted the BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS section to weigh it and check its balance.
- It was 195.6 kg, which is 18 kg(!) less than the capacity of the SF.
- There was a major imbalance in roll: with all four built-in trim masses moved up the +Y end, it still needed 270 g of extra trim mass to be level. This can probably be made up easily by designing the 18 kg of extra mass appropriately.
- Unfortunately when we put the payload, the IM was slightly yawed and ended up on the horizontal EQ stop screws. This let the IM-BF maraging rod go slack, which disturbed the leveling of the IM (because every time it is picked up the maraging rod settles in a different place, giving a different suspension point).
- We removed the end panels of the IRM to get access to the IM and rearranged the trim mass on the the IM to get it balance to bubble-level precision. (We still need to do fine pitch adjustment with the OL so that the BS is at the right angle, secure the trim mass properly and replace the IRM panels and OSEMs.)
- Miyakawa-san and Yamamoto-san redid the cabling from the computer room to the PR2 rack and expected to finish by lunchtime on Friday.
- Hirata-san
- Did parts and fastener lists for the SR payload.
- Did a 3D model with the SR suspension on the BS assembly frame (to help Mark make adjustments to the frame design).
- Did 2D drawings of Fabian's concept for BS EQ stop parts.
- Did a 3D model of a wire clamp with replaceable jaw parts (to avoid having to reuse parts with scars from pressure).
- Did 2D drawings of a new wire clamps for on top of the BS and SR RMs.
- Mark, Fabian and Enzo continued BS Test Hang work:
- BF issue
- The BF has three issues that may or may not be related:
- The keystone is sitting at an angle, which means:
- The bottom of the keystone just barely clears the magnet yoke without rubbing.
- The suspension point for the IM rod is offset, so the BF does not hang level, even with all built-in trim masses moved to their limits (an additional 270 g stacked on the +Y side of the cap is required).
- The load capacity is slightly less than measured by Hirata-san during tuning at the ATC.
- The frequency is rather higher than measured by Hirata-san.
- The keystone is sitting at an angle, which means:
- Also, the BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS system is 18.1 kg light (195.6 kg) compared to the load capacity of the SF (213.7 kg).
- The BF has three issues that may or may not be related: