Differences between revisions 68 and 283 (spanning 215 versions)
Revision 68 as of 2016-09-29 13:47:43
Size: 2449
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Revision 283 as of 2018-05-11 11:35:38
Size: 2841
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Type B Past Week Summary, weeks of 9/19 and 9/26
  * Fabian, Mark and Kuwahara-kun did BS installation at Kamioka:
   * The BS clean booth was modified 9/20-21 to allow crane access. The area was fairly clean when Fabian inspected it on 9/26, but there were lots of metal flakes stuck to tape holding foil over the slit in the top of the clean bag.
   * Mark created a new Type B rtcds model and MEDM screens for the BS, adapting the TypeBb/PR3.
   * Mark and Kokeyama-san debugged the new model, fixing several issues.
   * Kuwahara-kun derived OSEM2EUL and EUL2OSEM matrices.
   * Mark set up OSEMINF filters using measured OSEM calibration data to return outputs in µm.
   * Mark took free-swing data on the TM stage to get the pendulum mode frequencies for comparison to the SUMCON model.
   * Mark and Fabian debugged the coil output to the OSEMs. (At first the coil drive was not giving output because it did not have BIO inputs and so was reading the test input, not the main input. And for a while output failed because of a loose cable to the sat amp.)
   * Mark took fixed-sine TFs to check the polarity of the coil-magnet combinations.
  * Hirata-san:
   * Finished 3D CAD of SRM in tanks (but some work was lost due to a hard disk crash).
   * Did 3D and 2D for new maraging rods, stub flags for PR/SR (ditto re hard disk).
   * Measured/tested Type A BF #8 and started assembling #9.
 * Longer term to-do list
  * Do Inventor assembly for SRx in chamber and on assembly frame (Hirata) - SR2/SR3 DONE, SRM ongoing.
   * Part "disk security" top has to be modified - screw positions do not match.
  * Write more of payload assembly procedure (Fabian) - ONGOING
  * Write more of BS Assembly Procedure [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4235| E1504235]], [[https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D5CCFA70A378E0D0!195&authkey=!AM_usynuo9QI57g&ithint=folder,webloc|E1504235 draft]] (Mark) - ONGOING
  * Lower breadboard installation to be incorporated into the procedure document.
  * Work on BS simulation (Fabian)
  * Do BS Simulink model (Mark, Kokeyama) - TM/IM/BF level DONE
  * Do 2D drawings of SR2 parts (Hirata)
  * Redesign SRx IM wire clamps for larger prisms, remachined RMs
  * Order SRM/PRM parts (Hirata/Shoda)
  * Order SRx fasteners (Hirata)
=== Type B (Mark) ===
==== Report for week of 5/7 ====
 * We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
  * The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
  * We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
  * None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
  * All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
 * We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
 * We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
 * We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
 * We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
 * We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
Line 32: Line 18:
==== Plan for week of 5/14 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
 *

==== Plan for week of 5/21 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.

==== Plan for week of 5/28 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
Line 33: Line 30:
==== To-Do Lists, Schedule ====
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/March2018]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/April2018]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoBS]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoSR]]
 * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=7779|JGW-L1807779-v1 Type B Schedule (SR)]]

==== Vacation Info ====

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 5/7

  • We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
    • The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
    • We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
    • None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
    • All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
  • We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
  • We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
  • We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
  • We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
  • We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.

Plan for week of 5/14

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.

Plan for week of 5/21

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.

Plan for week of 5/28

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.

To-Do Lists, Schedule

Vacation Info

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)