Differences between revisions 70 and 283 (spanning 213 versions)
Revision 70 as of 2016-10-07 11:51:43
Size: 2136
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Revision 283 as of 2018-05-11 11:35:38
Size: 2841
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Type B Past Week Summary, weeks of 9/19 and 9/26
  * Fabian, Mark and Liu-kun did BS installation at Kamioka:
   * Connected the DIO card to the LPCD. (Simulink model changes will be needed to make use of it.)
   * Took TF data from the TM-H1 coil output to the voltage and current monitors and found that the response was approximately flat.
   * Used the 90° prism and the optical lever to set the pitch of the RM to match the dummy BS.
   * Removed the RM trolley and added the bottom section of the security structure.
   * Lifted the IM/RM/BS with the load gauge adapter and load gauge and measured its mass.
  * Hirata-san:
   * Modified drawing of maraging rods for BS [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5706| D1605706]]
   * Made 3D models of stub flag gluing jigs.
   * Made 3D models and 2D drawing of BS BF-IM hexagon cable clamp assembly and cone parts. [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5734| D1605734]]
   * Washed parts and screws.
   * (For Type A) Assembled and adjusted blades of BF #9.
 * Longer term to-do list
  * Do Inventor assembly for SRx in chamber and on assembly frame (Hirata) - SR2/SR3 DONE, SRM ongoing.
   * Part "disk security" top has to be modified - screw positions do not match.
  * Write more of payload assembly procedure (Fabian) - ONGOING
  * Write more of BS Assembly Procedure [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4235| E1504235]], [[https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D5CCFA70A378E0D0!195&authkey=!AM_usynuo9QI57g&ithint=folder,webloc|E1504235 draft]] (Mark) - ONGOING
  * Lower breadboard installation to be incorporated into the procedure document.
  * Work on BS simulation (Fabian)
  * Do BS Simulink model (Mark, Kokeyama) - TM/IM/BF level DONE
  * Do 2D drawings of SR2 parts (Hirata)
  * Redesign SRx IM wire clamps for larger prisms, remachined RMs
  * Order SRM/PRM parts (Hirata/Shoda)
  * Order SRx fasteners (Hirata)
=== Type B (Mark) ===
==== Report for week of 5/7 ====
 * We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
  * The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
  * We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
  * None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
  * All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
 * We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
 * We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
 * We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
 * We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
 * We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
Line 31: Line 18:
==== Plan for week of 5/14 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
 *

==== Plan for week of 5/21 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.

==== Plan for week of 5/28 ====
 * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
 * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
Line 32: Line 30:
==== To-Do Lists, Schedule ====
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/March2018]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/April2018]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoBS]]
 * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoSR]]
 * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=7779|JGW-L1807779-v1 Type B Schedule (SR)]]

==== Vacation Info ====

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

Type B (Mark)

Report for week of 5/7

  • We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
    • The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
    • We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
    • None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
    • All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
  • We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
  • We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
  • We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
  • We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
  • We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.

Plan for week of 5/14

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.

Plan for week of 5/21

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.

Plan for week of 5/28

  • Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
  • Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.

To-Do Lists, Schedule

Vacation Info

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)