|
Size: 2032
Comment:
|
Size: 3427
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| * Type B Past Week Summary * Fabian, Mark and Liu-kun did BS installation at Kamioka: * Built up the security structure to the ring below the BF. * Adjusted the crossbeams below the BF and installed the jacks and pushrods to support the BF. * Craned in the BF. * Took TFs from L and P actuation at the RM to all DOFs at the BS. (Y actuation still to be done.) * Hirata-san: * Made 3D models of (revised) stub flag gluing jigs. * (For other groups) * Assembled two BFs. * Made drawings of PRM inner frame. * Mark checked lots of drawings by Hirata-san. * Mark worked on schedule. * Mark added the DIO card to a draft of the BS electronics diagram, D1503600. At first it appeared that the pinouts of the LPCD DIO connectors were completely incompatible with the DIO card cables, but it turns out (according to Miyakawa) that the LPCD chassis has a secret interface board (JGW-D1504332) not shown in the chassis drawing which makes everything work. * Longer term to-do list * Do Inventor assembly for SRx in chamber and on assembly frame (Hirata) - SR2/SR3 DONE, SRM ongoing. * Part "disk security" top has to be modified - screw positions do not match. * Write more of payload assembly procedure (Fabian) - ONGOING * Write more of BS Assembly Procedure [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4235| E1504235]], [[https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=D5CCFA70A378E0D0!195&authkey=!AM_usynuo9QI57g&ithint=folder,webloc|E1504235 draft]] (Mark) - ONGOING * Lower breadboard installation to be incorporated into the procedure document. * Work on BS simulation (Fabian) * Do BS Simulink model (Mark, Kokeyama) - TM/IM/BF level DONE * Do 2D drawings of SR2 parts (Hirata) * Redesign SRx IM wire clamps for larger prisms, remachined RMs * Order SRM/PRM parts (Hirata/Shoda) * Order SRx fasteners (Hirata) |
=== Type B (Mark) === ==== Report for week of 5/7 ==== * We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break. * The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much. * We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force. * None of the screws showed any signs of damage. * All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down. * We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length). * We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF. * We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM. * We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing. * We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load. * Mirapro installed the SRM mushroom. |
| Line 32: | Line 19: |
| ==== Plan for week of 5/14 ==== * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka. * Weigh IM/... section. * Characterize F0 blade prototypes. * Remove F0 blade prototypes (and send for rework if necessary). * Start characterizing LBB blades. * Crane in BF. * Add IRM top plate, maraging rod, flying saucer. * Suspend IM, check pitch, roll and vertical, adjust trim mass. * Cable and (re-)test TM OSEMs, IM picos, BF yaw pico, BF LVDT and FR. ==== Plan for week of 5/21 ==== * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri. * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri. * Install IRM sides, and IM OSEMs. * Center IM OSEMs (in/out and laterally) * Route all cables to underneath BF. * Add BF internal ballast mass. * Add BF cap. ==== Plan for week of 5/28 ==== * Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri. * Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only. * TBD. ==== To-Do Lists, Schedule ==== * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/March2018]] * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/April2018]] * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoBS]] * [[KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/ToDoSR]] * [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=7779|JGW-L1807779-v1 Type B Schedule (SR)]] ==== Vacation Info ==== |
Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes
KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ
Type B (Mark)
Report for week of 5/7
- We inspected the wires and clamps involved in the wire break.
- The scars on the clamp on the tungsten wire that failed had very different depths, with the one that failed being much deeper, so probably the clamp piece was not completely straight before tensioning. However one wire on the other side was also badly crushed and on the point of failing, so the tension was clearly too much.
- We decided on new torque specs of 2 N.m for the primary clamps (down from 5 N.m) and 10 N.m (down from 20 N.m) for the secondary. The secondary clamp spec, for M6 screws, is now based on the LIGO policy of using the maximum suggested for the screw and the LIGO value for a coated 1/4-20 screw (100 in-lb = 11.3 N.m), and the primary clamp spec is derated by 2/3 from the spec for an M5 screw because the clamp pieces are recessed and only grip the wire at narrow sections along the edges, concentrating the force.
- None of the screws showed any signs of damage.
- All of the scars on the primary clamps were shallow enough that could reuse the clamp pieces. The tungsten secondary clamps were never tightened, and the outer pieces of piano wire secondary clamps were badly scarred but could be reused upside down.
- We successfully rehung the SR3 and RM. In the process we noticed and fixed an issue with the assembly frame (due to an out-of-date number in the Mirapro diagram, the IM crossbars were set 3 mm too high, which would have affected the wire length).
- We added the sections of the security structure below the RM and up to the BF.
- We installed the TM OSEM cables and routed them up to the IM.
- We installed the load gauge adapter and load gauge and prepared the IM/... section for weighing.
- We removed the three cracked F0 blades from the PI #3 in the SRM, and prepared for testing prototype new blades in that PI. We removed a floor panel under the PI and set up the filter service trolley underneath it with a stack of masses for a dummy load.
- Mirapro installed the SRM mushroom.
Plan for week of 5/14
- Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon-Thu, then Osaka.
- Weigh IM/... section.
- Characterize F0 blade prototypes.
- Remove F0 blade prototypes (and send for rework if necessary).
- Start characterizing LBB blades.
- Crane in BF.
- Add IRM top plate, maraging rod, flying saucer.
- Suspend IM, check pitch, roll and vertical, adjust trim mass.
- Cable and (re-)test TM OSEMs, IM picos, BF yaw pico, BF LVDT and FR.
Plan for week of 5/21
- Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
- Kozu-kun at Kamioka Wed-Fri.
- Install IRM sides, and IM OSEMs.
- Center IM OSEMs (in/out and laterally)
- Route all cables to underneath BF.
- Add BF internal ballast mass.
- Add BF cap.
Plan for week of 5/28
- Mark, Enzo, Hirata-san, Kamioka Mon-Fri.
- Kozu-kun at Kamioka Mon only.
- TBD.
To-Do Lists, Schedule