Differences between revisions 85 and 97 (spanning 12 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 85 as of 2016-11-25 10:32:16 →
Size: 1887
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
← Revision 97 as of 2016-12-15 14:09:09 → ⇥
Size: 1797
Editor: MarkBarton
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Type B Past Week Summary
  * Mark (with Enzo) did initial TFs on the BF.
   * Did fixed-sine TFs on individual OSEMs at low frequency to check actuator polarity (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=2176 | 2176]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=2182|2182]]).
   * Set gains in the COILOUTF block to compensate for actuator polarity.
  * Mark (with Enzo) did a free-swing measurement on the BS after earthquake of 11/22 (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=2182|2182]]).
   * Results suspicious (noted by Shoda-san): too much difference between OSEMs - horizontal showing much less motion than vertical.
   * Possible rubbing in horizontal.
   * May need a trip to Kamioka.
  * Mark (with Enzo) made corrections and improvements to many of the MEDM screens (klog [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=2176 | 2176]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=2182|2182]]).
   * Main overview screen was not generic in many places, and links to GDS_TP screens were broken.
   * ADC monitor screen referenced bad channels with LIGO-style names.
   * DAC monitor screen was not generic and did not support IM OSEMs.
   * Watchdog IM OSEM AC band limit filter screen was a copy of the TM one.
   * Watchdog TM OSEM AC band limit filter screen appears to be getting OL signals as input - needs model changes to fix.
   * The zoomed screens for IM OSEM centering were called incorrectly and did not work.
   * Various screens had LIGO-style channel names as labels.
  * Mark did a draft of D1603600-v12 reflecting the new assignment of IM OSEMs to DAQ channels (#4-9 are now V1, V2, V3, H1, H2, H3 rather than H1, H2, ...) from last Friday (the wiring was changed to reflect the model).
  * Mark worked on schedule.
  * Hirata-san
  		  * Mark, Fabian and Enzo continued BS Test Hang work:
  * We installed the BF fishing rod stepper motor adaptor cable.
  * We tried to install the BF LVDT cable but first we encountered trouble routing it, and then several wires broke at the D-Sub end.
  * We laid 6 in-air cables from the tank to the PR2 rank for BF and SF picos, steppers and LVDTs.
  * We lifted the BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS section to weigh it and check its balance.
   * It was 195.6 kg, which is 18 kg(!) less than the capacity of the SF.
   * There was a major imbalance in roll: with all four built-in trim masses moved up the +Y end, it still needed 270 g of extra trim mass to be level.
  * Unfortunately when we put the payload, the IM was slightly yawed and ended up on the horizontal EQ stop screws. This let the IM-BF maraging rod go slack, which disturbed the leveling of the IM (because every time it is picked up the maraging rod settles in a different place, giving a different suspension point). We may have to partly disassemble the IRM and rearrange the time mass on the the IM.
  * We shipped BS mirror box parts to Shoda-san and components for a new LVDT cable to Hirata-san.
  * We posed for pictures of the BS by a team from National Geographic.
 * Hirata-san
  * Did parts and fastener lists for the SR payload.
  * Did a 3D model with the SR suspension on the BS assembly frame (to help Mark make adjustments to the frame design).
  * Did 2D drawings of Fabian's concept for BS EQ stop parts.
  * Did a 3D model of a wire clamp with replaceable jaw parts (to avoid having to reuse parts with scars from pressure).
  * Did 2D drawings of a new wire clamps for on top of the BS and SR RMs.

Scraps of text for incorporation in the VIS Meeting Minutes

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/MeetingNAOJ

  • Mark, Fabian and Enzo continued BS Test Hang work:
    • We installed the BF fishing rod stepper motor adaptor cable.
    • We tried to install the BF LVDT cable but first we encountered trouble routing it, and then several wires broke at the D-Sub end.
    • We laid 6 in-air cables from the tank to the PR2 rank for BF and SF picos, steppers and LVDTs.
    • We lifted the BF/IRM/IM/RM/BS section to weigh it and check its balance.
      • It was 195.6 kg, which is 18 kg(!) less than the capacity of the SF.
      • There was a major imbalance in roll: with all four built-in trim masses moved up the +Y end, it still needed 270 g of extra trim mass to be level.
    • Unfortunately when we put the payload, the IM was slightly yawed and ended up on the horizontal EQ stop screws. This let the IM-BF maraging rod go slack, which disturbed the leveling of the IM (because every time it is picked up the maraging rod settles in a different place, giving a different suspension point). We may have to partly disassemble the IRM and rearrange the time mass on the the IM.
    • We shipped BS mirror box parts to Shoda-san and components for a new LVDT cable to Hirata-san.
    • We posed for pictures of the BS by a team from National Geographic.
  • Hirata-san
    • Did parts and fastener lists for the SR payload.
    • Did a 3D model with the SR suspension on the BS assembly frame (to help Mark make adjustments to the frame design).
    • Did 2D drawings of Fabian's concept for BS EQ stop parts.
    • Did a 3D model of a wire clamp with replaceable jaw parts (to avoid having to reuse parts with scars from pressure).
    • Did 2D drawings of a new wire clamps for on top of the BS and SR RMs.

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/TypeB/Minutes (last edited 2022-10-28 10:02:46 by fabian.arellano)