Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2019-05-23 21:52:05
Size: 1391
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2019-05-24 13:07:55
Size: 3972
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:

2019/5/24 13:30 - 
2019/5/24 13:30 -
Line 16: Line 15:
=== Type B (Mark) ===
==== Past week report (written by Fabian) ====
 * Terrence implemented a filter for the inertial damping. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8905|8905]].
 * The highlight of the week is Terrence's measurement of the residual motion of the SR2 optic: as measured by the oplev, it does fulfill the RMS displacement and velocity requirements for lock acquisition and, partially, for the observation mode also. See the report at klog entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8949|8949]].
  * The integrated RMS was calculated from 5 Hz to DC because there are some peaks between 8 Hz and 10 Hz and whose origin still has to be clarified. See the report at entries [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8918|8918]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8933|8933]].
  * After Akutsu-san's suggestion Terrence improved the air shield in two rounds, including a cylindrical cover around the viewport. This reduced the noise by about a factor of 10.
  * He realized setting up the shield may have slightly changed something in the oplev and carried out another round of diagonalization.
  * He realized the H3 coil was not working. We fixed it.A cable was disconnected.
  * The optic residual motion in L showed a large peaks close to 0.2 Hz, which is where the micro-seismic may become apparent. The peak was not seen in P or Y. The inertial damping system is likely not working in a suitable way. The blending frequency is 0.190 Hz which may not be low enough.
  * At the end measurement of the residual motion reported was carried out with inertial damping only in yaw.
 * Fabian, Terrence and Fujii-kun measured the settings of the SR2, BS LVDT drivers and one of SR2's. See klogs [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8941|8941]] , [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8951|8951]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=8952|8952]].
 * Fabian worked more on the calculation of the amount of sensor noise injected:
  * I imported Panwei's OSEM noise measurements and calculated the virtual sensor noise.
  * I imported Fujii-kun's measuement of the geophone noise and calculated the virtual sensor noise.
  * I imported the blending filter
  * I wrote lots of comments in Sekiguchi-kun's Matlab scripts.
  * I will write a klog soon with preliminar results.
 * Fabian submitted and abstract for the Autumn JPS meeting on September.
Line 17: Line 34:
=== Type B (Mark) ===
==== Past week report ====
Line 20: Line 35:
 * Terrence will work in the optimization of the inertial damping.
 * We have to measure the settings of the SR3 LVDT driver.
 * Fabian will continue with the calculation and prepare a presentation for the conference in Brazil.
Line 24: Line 42:
Line 28: Line 45:
Line 32: Line 48:
Line 34: Line 49:
Line 39: Line 53:
  * Type-A:    * Type-A:
Line 56: Line 70:
  * Takahashi: 
  * Sato: 
  * Mark: 
  * Hirata: 
  * Takahashi:
  * Sato:
  * Mark:
  * Hirata:
Line 61: Line 75:
  * Fujii:    * Fujii:
Line 67: Line 81:
  * Takahashi: 
  * Sato: 
  * Mark: 
  * Hirata: 
  * Takahashi:
  * Sato:
  * Mark:
  * Hirata:
Line 72: Line 86:
  * Fujii:    * Fujii:

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2019/5/24

2019/5/24 13:30 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

Progress report

Schedule

Site work schedule: [[|XLSX]]

Type-A (Takahashi)

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

Type B (Mark)

Past week report (written by Fabian)

  • Terrence implemented a filter for the inertial damping. See entry 8905.

  • The highlight of the week is Terrence's measurement of the residual motion of the SR2 optic: as measured by the oplev, it does fulfill the RMS displacement and velocity requirements for lock acquisition and, partially, for the observation mode also. See the report at klog entry 8949.

    • The integrated RMS was calculated from 5 Hz to DC because there are some peaks between 8 Hz and 10 Hz and whose origin still has to be clarified. See the report at entries 8918 and 8933.

    • After Akutsu-san's suggestion Terrence improved the air shield in two rounds, including a cylindrical cover around the viewport. This reduced the noise by about a factor of 10.
    • He realized setting up the shield may have slightly changed something in the oplev and carried out another round of diagonalization.
    • He realized the H3 coil was not working. We fixed it.A cable was disconnected.
    • The optic residual motion in L showed a large peaks close to 0.2 Hz, which is where the micro-seismic may become apparent. The peak was not seen in P or Y. The inertial damping system is likely not working in a suitable way. The blending frequency is 0.190 Hz which may not be low enough.
    • At the end measurement of the residual motion reported was carried out with inertial damping only in yaw.
  • Fabian, Terrence and Fujii-kun measured the settings of the SR2, BS LVDT drivers and one of SR2's. See klogs 8941 , 8951 and 8952.

  • Fabian worked more on the calculation of the amount of sensor noise injected:
    • I imported Panwei's OSEM noise measurements and calculated the virtual sensor noise.
    • I imported Fujii-kun's measuement of the geophone noise and calculated the virtual sensor noise.
    • I imported the blending filter
    • I wrote lots of comments in Sekiguchi-kun's Matlab scripts.
    • I will write a klog soon with preliminar results.
  • Fabian submitted and abstract for the Autumn JPS meeting on September.

Plan for coming weeks

  • Terrence will work in the optimization of the inertial damping.
  • We have to measure the settings of the SR3 LVDT driver.
  • Fabian will continue with the calculation and prepare a presentation for the conference in Brazil.

Type-Bp (Shoda)

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

OMMT & OSTM

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

VIS electronics (Tanaka)

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

Other site works

Safety

  • Incidents:
  • Foreseen risks
    • Type-A:
    • Type-B:

Discussion

  • Middle Sized Baffles
  • TO DO List for O3
    • Hierarchical control of Type-A (with CRY)
    • Improved watchdog
      • Digital
      • Hardware
    • Type-B IP damping
      • Inertial or CMRR ?
    • VIS status monitor
    • Operation manuals

Travel Plans

  • Travel (Week of 5/27):
    • Takahashi:
    • Sato:
    • Mark:
    • Hirata:
    • Shoda:
    • Fujii:
    • Tanioka:
    • Tanaka:
    • Terrence:
  • Travel (Week of 6/3):
    • Takahashi:
    • Sato:
    • Mark:
    • Hirata:
    • Shoda:
    • Fujii:
    • Tanioka:
    • Tanaka:
    • Terrence:

Next meeting

On 2019/5/31(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20190524 (last edited 2019-05-24 16:48:15 by YoichiAso)