Size: 1039
Comment:
|
Size: 3656
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 13: | Line 13: |
==== Past week report ==== ==== Plan for coming weeks ==== |
==== Report for the week 05-08-2019 (Written by Fabian) ==== * After Shoda-san's report (entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9797|9797]]) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state. * After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9844|9844]]. * I replaced the chassis with an appropriate one. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. * I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9823|9823]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. * The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2. * For BS and SR3 the configurations are different. * Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other. * This situation should be reviewed. * Additionally, according to Miyakawa-san Type B is using a wrong software inti-whitening filter. Apparently there was a confusion with normalized and non-normalized parameters. * Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though. * At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9807|9807]]. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries * The motion of the '''IP-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band '''from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz'''. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet. * The motion of the '''IM-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' nd '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz'''. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters. * The motion of the '''IM-P''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.135 Hz to 1 Hz'''. The motion in the band from '''0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP''', however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters. * The motion in '''IM-Y''' induces motion '''TM-Y''' between '''1 Hz and 2.3 Hz'''. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters. * I began measuring transfer functions (IM-L to TM-L) but I should finish the setting the software anti-whitening filter first. ==== Plan for the week 15-08-2019 ==== * Finish measuring transfer functions. * Begin the design of filters. |
Line 22: | Line 44: |
Line 23: | Line 46: |
Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2019/8/9
2019/8/9 14:00 -
Participants:
Progress report
Type-A
Past week report
Plan for coming weeks
Type B
Report for the week 05-08-2019 (Written by Fabian)
After Shoda-san's report (entry 9797) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state.
I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry 9823 and 9876.
- The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2.
- For BS and SR3 the configurations are different.
- Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other.
- This situation should be reviewed.
- Additionally, according to Miyakawa-san Type B is using a wrong software inti-whitening filter. Apparently there was a confusion with normalized and non-normalized parameters.
- Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though.
At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry 9807. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries
The motion of the IP-L induces motion in TM-P and TM-L in the frequency band from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet.
The motion of the IM-L induces motion in TM-P nd TM-L in the frequency band from 0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters.
The motion of the IM-P induces motion in TM-P and TM-L in the frequency band from 0.135 Hz to 1 Hz. The motion in the band from 0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP, however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters.
The motion in IM-Y induces motion TM-Y between 1 Hz and 2.3 Hz. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters.
- I began measuring transfer functions (IM-L to TM-L) but I should finish the setting the software anti-whitening filter first.
Plan for the week 15-08-2019
- Finish measuring transfer functions.
- Begin the design of filters.
Type-Bp
Past week report
Plan for coming weeks
OMMT & OSTM (Takahashi)
Past week report
- Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful.
- Assembled the mirror gluing jig with the modification parts.
Plan for coming weeks
VIS electronics
Past week report
Plan for coming weeks
Other site works
Safety
- Incidents:
Discussion
Travel Plans
- Travel (Week of 8/12):
- Takahashi:
- Sato:
- Hirata:
- Shoda:
- Fujii:
- Tanaka:
- Travel (Week of 8/19):
- Takahashi:
- Sato:
- Hirata:
- Shoda:
- Fujii:
- Tanaka:
Next meeting
On 2019/8/16(Fri)