Size: 3632
Comment:
|
← Revision 12 as of 2019-08-09 14:42:19 ⇥
Size: 4688
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 11: | Line 11: |
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- ---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- ===== common issue ===== * RT model modification by K. Okutomi * Still seinsmometer signal is not delivered to the ITMY-real time model. ===== ITMY ===== * health check for the tower part by Lucia * F2-GAS TF looked weird. [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9790|9790]] * health check for the payload part * not yet done. * Guardian for ITMY was unified. * The failure of MN_DCCTRL seemed to be solved by the commissioners * ITMY damping work is (kind of) started. ===== ETMY ===== * Inertial damping performance check * LVDT control vs. inertial control * Closing both L and T loops caused an oscillation at ___ Hz. * => spectra? * => Due to cradle effect? ===== ETMX ===== * A test of sensor correction and feed-forwarding is now ongoing. ===== ITMX ===== * It seemed that the TML-oplev noise level issue did not due to the light source. Due to air-shielding? ---- __ /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' __ ---- __ __ |
|
Line 14: | Line 54: |
* After Shoda-san's report (entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9797|9797]]) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state. * After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9844|9844]]. * I replaced the chassis with an appropriate one. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. * I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9823|9823]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. * The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2. * For BS and SR3 the configurations are different. * Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other. * This situation should be reviewed. * Additionally, according to Miyakawa-san Type B is using a wrong software inti-whitening filter. Apparently there was a confusion with normalized and non-normalized parameters. * Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though. * At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9807|9807]]. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries * The motion of the '''IP-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band '''from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz'''. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet. * The motion of the '''IM-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' nd '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz'''. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters. * The motion of the '''IM-P''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.135 Hz to 1 Hz'''. The motion in the band from '''0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP''', however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters. * The motion in '''IM-Y''' induces motion '''TM-Y''' between '''1 Hz and 2.3 Hz'''. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters. * I began measuring transfer functions (IM-L to TM-L) but I should finish the setting the software anti-whitening filter first. |
* __After Shoda-san's report (entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9797|9797]]) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state. __ * __After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9844|9844]]. __ * __I replaced the chassis with an appropriate one. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. __ * __I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9823|9823]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. __ * __The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2. __ * __For BS and SR3 the configurations are different. __ * __Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other. __ * __This situation should be reviewed. __ * __Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though. __ * __At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9807|9807]]. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries __ * __The motion of the '''IP-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band '''from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz'''. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet. __ * __The motion of the '''IM-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' nd '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz'''. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters. __ * __The motion of the '''IM-P''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.135 Hz to 1 Hz'''. The motion in the band from '''0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP''', however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters. __ * __The motion in '''IM-Y''' induces motion '''TM-Y''' between '''1 Hz and 2.3 Hz'''. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters. __ |
Line 32: | Line 70: |
* Finish measuring transfer functions. * Begin the design of filters. |
* __Finish measuring transfer functions. __ * __Begin the design of filters. __ |
Line 37: | Line 75: |
* __New auto-measurement system is ready for -Bp. -B templates are now under preparation. __ * __New VIS app is released. () __ |
|
Line 40: | Line 81: |
* Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful. * Assembled the mirror gluing jig with the modification parts. |
* __Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful. __ * __Assembled the mirror gluing jig with the modification parts. __ |
Line 49: | Line 90: |
* Incidents: | * __Incidents: __ |
Line 53: | Line 94: |
* Travel (Week of 8/12): | * __Travel (Week of 8/12): |
Line 58: | Line 99: |
* Fujii: | * Fujii: 12-16 |
Line 60: | Line 101: |
__ | |
Line 61: | Line 103: |
* Travel (Week of 8/19): * Takahashi: |
* __Travel (Week of 8/19): * Takahashi: 22-24 |
Line 64: | Line 106: |
* Hirata: | * Hirata: 22-24 |
Line 66: | Line 108: |
* Fujii: | * Fujii: 20-24 |
Line 68: | Line 110: |
__ | |
Line 70: | Line 113: |
On 2019/8/16(Fri) | __On 2019/8/16(Fri) __ |
Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2019/8/9
2019/8/9 14:00 -
Participants:
Progress report
Type-A
Past week report
Edit conflict - other version:
Edit conflict - your version:
common issue
* RT model modification by K. Okutomi * Still seinsmometer signal is not delivered to the ITMY-real time model.
ITMY
- health check for the tower part by Lucia
F2-GAS TF looked weird. 9790
- health check for the payload part
- not yet done.
- Guardian for ITMY was unified.
- The failure of MN_DCCTRL seemed to be solved by the commissioners
- ITMY damping work is (kind of) started.
ETMY
- Inertial damping performance check
- LVDT control vs. inertial control
Closing both L and T loops caused an oscillation at _ Hz.
=> spectra?
=> Due to cradle effect?
- LVDT control vs. inertial control
ETMX
- A test of sensor correction and feed-forwarding is now ongoing.
ITMX
- It seemed that the TML-oplev noise level issue did not due to the light source. Due to air-shielding?
End of edit conflict
Plan for coming weeks
Type B
Report for the week 05-08-2019
After Shoda-san's report (entry 9797) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state.
After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry 9844.
The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2.
The motion of the IP-L induces motion in TM-P and TM-L in the frequency band from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet. Plan for the week 15-08-2019
Finish measuring transfer functions. Type-Bp
Past week report
New auto-measurement system is ready for -Bp. -B templates are now under preparation. Plan for coming weeks
OMMT & OSTM (Takahashi)
Past week report
Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful. Plan for coming weeks
VIS electronics
Past week report
Plan for coming weeks
Other site works
Safety
Incidents: Discussion
Travel Plans
Travel (Week of 8/12):
- Takahashi:
- Sato:
- Hirata:
- Shoda:
- Fujii: 12-16
- Tanaka:
Travel (Week of 8/19):
- Takahashi: 22-24
- Sato:
- Hirata: 22-24
- Shoda:
- Fujii: 20-24
- Tanaka:
Next meeting
On 2019/8/16(Fri)