Differences between revisions 9 and 10
Revision 9 as of 2019-08-09 13:58:06
Size: 4675
Editor: AyakaShoda
Comment:
Revision 10 as of 2019-08-09 14:01:03
Size: 4681
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 11: Line 11:
----
/!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:'''
Line 12: Line 14:
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ---- ----
Line 14: Line 16:
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ---- ----
/!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:'''

----
Line 16: Line 21:
* RT model modification by K. Okutomi
* Still seinsmometer signal is not delivered to the ITMY-real time model.
* RT model modification by K. Okutomi * Still seinsmometer signal is not delivered to the ITMY-real time model.
Line 19: Line 23:
===== ITMY  =====
 
* health check for the tower part by Lucia
   * F2-GAS TF looked weird. [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9790|9790]]
  * health check for the payload part
    * not yet done.
 
* Guardian for ITMY was unified.
   * The failure of MN_DCCTRL seemed to be solved by the commissioners
  * ITMY damping work is (kind of) started.
===== ITMY =====
* health check for the tower part by Lucia
  * F2-GAS TF looked weird. [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9790|9790]]
 * health check for the payload part
  * not yet done.
* Guardian for ITMY was unified.
  * The failure of MN_DCCTRL seemed to be solved by the commissioners
 * ITMY damping work is (kind of) started.
Line 29: Line 33:
  * Inertial damping performance check
   * LVDT control vs. inertial control
      * Closing both L and T loops caused an oscillation at ___ Hz.
       *
=> spectra?
       *
=> Due to cradle effect?
 * Inertial damping performance check
  * LVDT control vs. inertial control
   * Closing both L and T loops caused an oscillation at ___ Hz. __
    * __
=> spectra? __
    * __
=> Due to cradle effect? __
Line 36: Line 40:
  * A test of sensor correction and feed-forwarding is now ongoing.  * __A test of sensor correction and feed-forwarding is now ongoing. __
Line 39: Line 43:
  * It seemed that the TML-oplev noise level issue did not due to the light source. Due to air-shielding?  * __It seemed that the TML-oplev noise level issue did not due to the light source. Due to air-shielding? __
Line 41: Line 45:
----
__ /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' __
Line 42: Line 48:
---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ---- ----
__ __
Line 46: Line 54:
 * After Shoda-san's report (entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9797|9797]]) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state.
  * After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9844|9844]].
  * I replaced the chassis with an appropriate one. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]].
 * I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9823|9823]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]].
  * The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2.
  * For BS and SR3 the configurations are different.
  * Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other.
  * This situation should be reviewed.
  * Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though.
 * At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9807|9807]]. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries
  * The motion of the '''IP-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band '''from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz'''. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet.
  * The motion of the '''IM-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' nd '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz'''. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters.
  * The motion of the '''IM-P''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.135 Hz to 1 Hz'''. The motion in the band from '''0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP''', however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters.
  * The motion in '''IM-Y''' induces motion '''TM-Y''' between '''1 Hz and 2.3 Hz'''. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters.
  * I began measuring transfer functions (IM-L to TM-L) but I should finish the setting the software anti-whitening filter first.
 * __After Shoda-san's report (entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9797|9797]]) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state. __
  * __After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9844|9844]]. __
  * __I replaced the chassis with an appropriate one. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. __
 * __I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9823|9823]] and [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9876|9876]]. __
  * __The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2. __
  * __For BS and SR3 the configurations are different. __
  * __Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other. __
  * __This situation should be reviewed. __
  * __Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though. __
 * __At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9807|9807]]. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries __
  * __The motion of the '''IP-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band '''from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz'''. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet. __
  * __The motion of the '''IM-L''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' nd '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz'''. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters. __
  * __The motion of the '''IM-P''' induces motion in '''TM-P''' and '''TM-L''' in the frequency band from '''0.135 Hz to 1 Hz'''. The motion in the band from '''0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP''', however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters. __
  * __The motion in '''IM-Y''' induces motion '''TM-Y''' between '''1 Hz and 2.3 Hz'''. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters. __
Line 63: Line 70:
 * Finish measuring transfer functions.
 * Begin the design of filters.
 * __Finish measuring transfer functions. __
 * __Begin the design of filters. __
Line 68: Line 75:
 * New auto-measurement system is ready for -Bp. -B templates are now under preparation.
 * New VIS app is released. ()
 * __New auto-measurement system is ready for -Bp. -B templates are now under preparation. __
 * __New VIS app is released. () __
Line 72: Line 79:
Line 75: Line 81:
 * Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful.
 * Assembled the mirror gluing jig with the modification parts.
 * __Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful. __
 * __Assembled the mirror gluing jig with the modification parts. __
Line 84: Line 90:
 * Incidents:  * __Incidents: __
Line 88: Line 94:
 * Travel (Week of 8/12):
* Takahashi:
 * __Travel (Week of 8/12):  * Takahashi:
Line 95: Line 100:
__
Line 96: Line 102:
 * Travel (Week of 8/19):
* Takahashi:
 * __Travel (Week of 8/19):  * Takahashi:
Line 103: Line 108:
__
Line 105: Line 111:
On 2019/8/16(Fri) __On 2019/8/16(Fri) __

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2019/8/9

2019/8/9 14:00 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

Progress report

Type-A

Past week report


/!\ Edit conflict - other version:



/!\ Edit conflict - your version:


common issue

* RT model modification by K. Okutomi * Still seinsmometer signal is not delivered to the ITMY-real time model.

ITMY
  • health check for the tower part by Lucia
    • F2-GAS TF looked weird. 9790

  • health check for the payload part
    • not yet done.
  • Guardian for ITMY was unified.
    • The failure of MN_DCCTRL seemed to be solved by the commissioners
  • ITMY damping work is (kind of) started.

ETMY
  • Inertial damping performance check
    • LVDT control vs. inertial control
      • Closing both L and T loops caused an oscillation at _ Hz.

        • => spectra?

        • => Due to cradle effect?

ETMX
  • A test of sensor correction and feed-forwarding is now ongoing.

ITMX
  • It seemed that the TML-oplev noise level issue did not due to the light source. Due to air-shielding?


/!\ End of edit conflict


Plan for coming weeks

Type B

Report for the week 05-08-2019

  • After Shoda-san's report (entry 9797) I checked the condition of the filters in FLOAT state.

    • After a few tests I realized the whitening chassis didn't have a whitening filter board. See entry 9844.

    • I replaced the chassis with an appropriate one. See entry 9876.

  • I checked the configuration of the hardware whitening filters by checking the 32 bit dip switch boards for each supension. See entry 9823 and 9876.

    • The switch configuration is the same for SRM and SR2.

    • For BS and SR3 the configurations are different.

    • Additionally, the configuration of the two boards used for the BS oplev are different from each other.

    • This situation should be reviewed.

    • Type Bp and Type A don't seem to be using software anti-whitening filters for oplevs. I haven't checked their hardwate whitening filters' configuration though.

  • At the begining of the week I continued noise hunting in SR3. See entry 9807. The goal was to identify the limiting elements for the control system in ALIGNED state. See entries

    • The motion of the IP-L induces motion in TM-P and TM-L in the frequency band from 0.135 Hz to 0.4 Hz. This should be fixed at the IP. There's no inertial damping yet.

    • The motion of the IM-L induces motion in TM-P nd TM-L in the frequency band from 0.3 Hz to 0.8 Hz. Likely, this should be fixed with IML2TMP and IML2TML control filters.

    • The motion of the IM-P induces motion in TM-P and TM-L in the frequency band from 0.135 Hz to 1 Hz. The motion in the band from 0.135 to 0.4 Hz is likely ground motion coming from the IP, however, the motion from 0.4 Hz to 1 Hz should be fixed with IMP2TML and IMP2TMP control filters.

    • The motion in IM-Y induces motion TM-Y between 1 Hz and 2.3 Hz. This should be fixed with IMY2TMY control filters.

Plan for the week 15-08-2019

  • Finish measuring transfer functions.

  • Begin the design of filters.

Type-Bp

Past week report

  • New auto-measurement system is ready for -Bp. -B templates are now under preparation.

  • New VIS app is released. ()

Plan for coming weeks

OMMT & OSTM (Takahashi)

Past week report

  • Evaluated 9 of 16 OSEMs. 7 OSEMs are not useful.

  • Assembled the mirror gluing jig with the modification parts.

Plan for coming weeks

VIS electronics

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

Other site works

Safety

  • Incidents:

Discussion

Travel Plans

  • Travel (Week of 8/12): * Takahashi:

    • Sato:
    • Hirata:
    • Shoda:
    • Fujii:
    • Tanaka:

  • Travel (Week of 8/19): * Takahashi:

    • Sato:
    • Hirata:
    • Shoda:
    • Fujii:
    • Tanaka:

Next meeting

On 2019/8/16(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20190809 (last edited 2019-08-09 14:42:19 by RyutaroTakahashi)