Differences between revisions 10 and 11
Revision 10 as of 2019-08-16 10:43:10
Size: 2935
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2019-08-16 11:15:00
Size: 2944
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 30: Line 30:
 * 1st trial. The values are *NOT* installed since we could not guarantee if we were observing TML motion not TMY motion. It looks they are not terrible values, compared to ground motion though.  * 1st trial. The values are *NOT* installed to the MEDM since we could not guarantee if we were observing TML motion not TMY motion. It looks they are not terrible values, compared to ground motion though.
Line 33: Line 33:
 * log at 2019 Aug. 15th, when it was stacked: [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9990|9990]]  * log at 2019 Aug. 15th, when it was stuck: [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=9990|9990]]
Line 35: Line 35:
   * The difference between the above is like about 405um (it went to lower position.), based on GAS_LVDTINF_OUT channel.    * The difference between the above is like about 405um (it went to lower position), based on GAS_LVDTINF_OUT channel.

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2019/8/16

2019/8/16 14:00 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

Progress report

Type-A

Past week report

* For the 150mHz-ish mode damping

  • sensor correction for IP, i.e., seismic signal subtraction system, was implemented to all the type-A suspensions.
  • BF-L/T damping was also implemented for this damping.
    • The RMS was suppressed by a factor of like 2.7, log 9961

  • (SC at IP) + (BF-L/T) made the system quieter compared to the previous, however, it was not enough
    • IP-TF does not have the peak at 150mHz-ish.
    • BF-actuation efficiency is not so high.
    • => we will try to the feedback like BFl to IPL, or TML to IPL, for the next.

      • For this purpose, we have to modify the model again.

* For inertial damping performance test, LVDT damping vs. inertial damping > By Lucia

  • ETMY: 9981

  • ITMX: 9995

    • What is the summary for this week?

* length-oplev calibration with green lock

  • log: 9989

  • 1st trial. The values are *NOT* installed to the MEDM since we could not guarantee if we were observing TML motion not TMY motion. It looks they are not terrible values, compared to ground motion though.

* F3-GAS of EY: looks stacked again

  • log at 2019 Aug. 15th, when it was stuck: 9990

  • log at 2019 Aug. 15th, when it was free: 9293

    • The difference between the above is like about 405um (it went to lower position), based on GAS_LVDTINF_OUT channel.

* ETMY health check

  • lopg: 9996

    • => status and plan?

Plan for coming weeks

* Guardian stuff

  • utilize the TMY to BFY loop again, etc.

* RTmodel modification

  • make paths from TM to IPL, BFL to IPL.

* 150mHz-ish suppression

  • implement loops like TM to IP.

Type B

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

Type-Bp

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

OMMT & OSTM

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

VIS electronics

Past week report

Plan for coming weeks

Other site works

Safety

  • Incidents:

Discussion

  • For the people in Kamioka, checking the presence/absence at the site will help us (not only for Mitaka persons).

Travel Plans

  • Travel (Week of 8/19):
    • Takahashi:
    • Sato:
    • Hirata:
    • Shoda:
    • Fujii:
    • Tanaka:
  • Travel (Week of 8/26):
    • Takahashi:
    • Sato:
    • Hirata:
    • Shoda:
    • Fujii:
    • Tanaka:

Next meeting

On 2019/8/29(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20190816 (last edited 2019-08-16 15:51:08 by YoichiAso)