Differences between revisions 6 and 21 (spanning 15 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 6 as of 2020-04-17 08:23:43 →
Size: 1076
Editor: RyutaroTakahashi
Comment:
← Revision 21 as of 2020-04-17 11:33:57 → ⇥
Size: 2759
Editor: RyutaroTakahashi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
2020/4/17 14:00 -  2020/4/17 14:00 -
Line 6: Line 6:
Participants:  Participants:
Line 15: Line 15:
=== General ===
Miyo-kun gathered information about LVDTs at [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11597|JGW-T2011597]]. Feedback seems to be required.
Line 17: Line 20:
Line 18: Line 22:
 * For a summary of the current status of inertial damping in Type-B suspensions see the appendix (p14 onwards) in this [[https://1drv.ms/b/s!AoQaV1tdsEcUgc5MtkkqJv5fcCYBrw?e=TXSzu0|presentation]] shown the Commissioning Meeting on the 27th of September 2019.
 * In the context of writing a paper I gathered information about OSEMs and LVDTs and uploaded a document at : [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11612|JGW-T2011612]], which I will be updating.Currently the content is
  * Linear ranges of 24 OSEMs and
  * Sensitivity of the six SRM OSEMS.
 * I gave feedback to Miyo-kun about LVDTs: all the current calibration factors in medm screens are consistent with klog reports. Just as a reminder:
  * The polarity of LVDTs is set in hardware: increase in LVDT output always means upwards motion or positive yaw in the IPs. Therefore, calibration factors in medm screens should always be positive.
  * An exception seems to be BS IP H2 LVDT, whose medm screen I have to check for a minus sign somewhere.
  * The offsets in medm screens correspond to the nominal places of keystones per the 3D-CAD, not the mid-point of the linear range.
Line 21: Line 34:
== Post O3 ==
 * Request
 * Papers		 == Post O3 (4/21~) ==
 * [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1w4q8OvX9E6nkYSgshLYLoZH5yvQXHvGmL1agux8ztx0/edit?usp=sharing|Request]]
 * Papers (Type-B: Fabian, Type-A: Lucia?)
 * Operation mode at the shutdown of KAGRA
Line 26: Line 41:

== Controls ==
 * Had a VIS control strategy meeting [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11557|documents]]
Line 28: Line 47:
 * Operation mode at the shutdown of KAGRA
Line 30: Line 48:

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2020/4/17

2020/4/17 14:00 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

VIS Commissioning Task List

Task list towards O4

Schedule afetr O3

Progress report

General

Miyo-kun gathered information about LVDTs at JGW-T2011597. Feedback seems to be required.

Type-A

Type B

  • For a summary of the current status of inertial damping in Type-B suspensions see the appendix (p14 onwards) in this presentation shown the Commissioning Meeting on the 27th of September 2019.

  • In the context of writing a paper I gathered information about OSEMs and LVDTs and uploaded a document at : JGW-T2011612, which I will be updating.Currently the content is

    • Linear ranges of 24 OSEMs and
    • Sensitivity of the six SRM OSEMS.
  • I gave feedback to Miyo-kun about LVDTs: all the current calibration factors in medm screens are consistent with klog reports. Just as a reminder:
    • The polarity of LVDTs is set in hardware: increase in LVDT output always means upwards motion or positive yaw in the IPs. Therefore, calibration factors in medm screens should always be positive.
    • An exception seems to be BS IP H2 LVDT, whose medm screen I have to check for a minus sign somewhere.
    • The offsets in medm screens correspond to the nominal places of keystones per the 3D-CAD, not the mid-point of the linear range.

Type-Bp

Type-C

Electronics

Post O3 (4/21~)

  • Request

  • Papers (Type-B: Fabian, Type-A: Lucia?)
  • Operation mode at the shutdown of KAGRA

Towards O3c

Controls

  • Had a VIS control strategy meeting documents

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

Next meeting

On 2020/4/24(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20200417 (last edited 2020-04-18 10:45:23 by RyutaroTakahashi)