Differences between revisions 4 and 5
Revision 4 as of 2020-04-24 08:19:56
Size: 1119
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2020-04-24 11:33:29
Size: 1520
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
Participants:  Participants:
Line 16: Line 16:
No apparent damage was inflicted to Type-B suspensions by the earthquakes.

 * All the signals from the QPDs and from the OSEMs look fine.
 * They can be put in ALINED state without apparent problem.
 * Yokozawa-san was able to lock the Y Arm with green light, which confirms that at least SR3 is fine.
Line 19: Line 25:
Line 25: Line 32:
  * Type-B: Fabian   * Type-B: Fabian: I have been gathering data about sensors and writing; there's still no draft to share.

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2020/4/24

2020/4/24 14:00 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

Task list towards O4

Schedule afetr O3

Progress report

General

Type-A

Type B

No apparent damage was inflicted to Type-B suspensions by the earthquakes.

  • All the signals from the QPDs and from the OSEMs look fine.
  • They can be put in ALINED state without apparent problem.
  • Yokozawa-san was able to lock the Y Arm with green light, which confirms that at least SR3 is fine.

Type-Bp

Type-C

  • AOS(Akutsu-san) suggested to modify the IMMT2 suspension.

Controls

Electronics

Post O3 (4/21~)

  • Request

  • Papers
    • Type-A: Lucia(General), Fujii(Sensor collection).
    • Type-B: Fabian: I have been gathering data about sensors and writing; there's still no draft to share.

Towards O3c

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

Next meeting

On 2020/5/1(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20200424 (last edited 2020-04-24 15:08:58 by RyutaroTakahashi)