Differences between revisions 15 and 16
Revision 15 as of 2020-08-07 13:56:28
Size: 3909
Editor: naohisa.sato
Comment:
Revision 16 as of 2020-08-07 13:58:10
Size: 4681
Editor: AyakaShoda
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 30: Line 30:

Line 33: Line 35:


=== Controls ===
 * Updated the sensor correction path in the Type-A modeling. The simulated signals at IP stage fitted well to the actual signal when the sensor correction accuracy is about 90 %.
  * With the updated control model, the TM displacement at micro-seismic motion was reduced by about 10 times. Therefore, the actuation efficiency should be about 10 times smaller than the design value to be consistent with the measured FB signal. If I roughly estimate the actuation efficiency, it is almost consistent with what CAL team measured.[[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14864|14864]]
 * I observed the pendulum wobbling when the asymmetry is introduced in the suspension wires. [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14868|14868]]

Line 49: Line 59:

Line 52: Line 64:

Agenda/Minutes of the VIS Meeting on 2020/8/7

2020/8/7 14:00 -

Zoom Meeting

Participants:

Progress report

General

Type-A

  • [Miyo] Installed the Prequa system in TypeA

    • (This week) Installation was finished. Now I try to diagonalize sensors and balance actuators by using the Prequa system.
    • (Next week) I will do the modal damping on TypeA suspensions after the initialization work for sensors and actuators.

Type-B

  • On Monday I submitted the paper to CPC: JGW-P2011860.

  • Noise budget paper: I calculated upper limits to DAC and coil driver noise contribution to DARM for the BS: klog 14875.

Type-Bp

  • Noise budget paper: Fabian calculated upper limits to DAC and coil driver noise contribution to DARM for PRM: klog 14876.

Type-C

  • Brainstorming meeting for IMMT2 modification was held yesterday. We discussed the modified shape of the outer frame and how to replace it. The plan is to replace the frame without removing IMMT2 from the chamber.

Controls

Controls

  • Updated the sensor correction path in the Type-A modeling. The simulated signals at IP stage fitted well to the actual signal when the sensor correction accuracy is about 90 %.
    • With the updated control model, the TM displacement at micro-seismic motion was reduced by about 10 times. Therefore, the actuation efficiency should be about 10 times smaller than the design value to be consistent with the measured FB signal. If I roughly estimate the actuation efficiency, it is almost consistent with what CAL team measured.14864

  • I observed the pendulum wobbling when the asymmetry is introduced in the suspension wires. 14868

Electronics

Towards O4

  • KAGRA is in "Upgrade phase for O4". PreQua system was implemented to the Type-A.

  • Confirmation of personnel at the site.
    • Type-A team: Takahashi, Sato, Miyo, + Company(Jan-Apr)
    • Type-B/Bp team: (Shoda,) Hirata, Fabian, Washimi, + Company(Oct-Dec)
  • Procedure documents are required by SEO.
  • Schedule towards O4 (Chart) was revised.

cf. Post Obs. task (Request), Task for O3c (Plan, Sheet), Task towards O4 (List).

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

Next meeting

  • On 2020/8/19(Wed)?

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20200807 (last edited 2020-08-07 14:58:03 by RyutaroTakahashi)