Differences between revisions 10 and 11
Revision 10 as of 2020-10-16 13:16:22
Size: 4346
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2020-10-16 13:19:29
Size: 5113
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 33: Line 33:
----
/!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:'''

----
Line 34: Line 38:
Line 36: Line 41:
----
/!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:'''

----

----
/!\ '''End of edit conflict'''

----
Line 47: Line 61:
----
/!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:'''

----

----
/!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:'''

----
 * After the blackout PR2 went to ALIGNED state well. PR3 and PRM oplevs were removed before recovery and I just checked they went to TWR_DAMPED state. I can turn the IM control system on by hand to check the health of IM-OSEMS.
 * Just for the record for new comers: I realized PR LVDTs use different amplitudes of reference signals for the LVDTs. According to labels attached to signals generators:
  * PR2: 6 Vpp.
  * PR3 and PRM: 7 Vpp.

----
/!\ '''End of edit conflict'''

----

Agenda/Minutes on 2020/10/16

Zoom Meeting

CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

13:30-

Participants:

VIS Meeting

14:00-

Participants:

Progress report

General

[Fabian]

  • I wrote a document about the procedure to replace the LVDT cards after a failure: JGW-T2012128.

    • It was checked by Alessandro Betolini from Nikhef and he says the method is correct. He provided minor comments that have been incorported to the new version of the document.
    • He says they will review the design for ETpathfinder and that's our chance to give them feedback (i.e. Tanaka-san's findings and my concerns as a user).
    • Knowledge transfer from Tanaka-san to Alessandro would be greatly beneficial for KAGRA. If you think it's suitable, would it be possible for someone to organize this, please?
  • Tanaka-san will take some of our LVDT cards for hardware modification.
    • We need to survey those LVDT cards before he takes them away. When will we do this?

    • As far as I understand, given the old calibration factor, he has to give us a procedure to calculate a new calibration factor. Is this statement correct?

    • Before any other card breaks, we need to survey all of them. When will we do this?

    • Four hands are required for the measurements. For Type-B/Bp, Washimi-san and Fabian can do it.

  • After cleaning the PR area I have the impression we lost Hirose-san's LED lamps to check mirror cleanliness.


/!\ Edit conflict - other version:


[Washimi]


/!\ Edit conflict - your version:



/!\ End of edit conflict


Type-A

Type-B

  • I gave some feedback for the noise budget paper.
  • We finished the cleaning with a lot of help.
  • Hirata-san made M6 holes in some ballast masses.
  • We removed some cables from chassis for the cleaning procedure.
  • I put the fibre optic camera in the PR clean booth buffer area.
  • We recovered the suspensions after blackout. They all went to ALIGNED state well.
  • The temperature has decreased a lot inside the clean rooms, likely due to an increase of cold air circulation after turning all FFUs on. A couple of DC control loops in GAS filters are about to saturate. I've reported this to Miyoki-san and he turned on some heaters.

Type-Bp


/!\ Edit conflict - other version:



/!\ Edit conflict - your version:


  • After the blackout PR2 went to ALIGNED state well. PR3 and PRM oplevs were removed before recovery and I just checked they went to TWR_DAMPED state. I can turn the IM control system on by hand to check the health of IM-OSEMS.
  • Just for the record for new comers: I realized PR LVDTs use different amplitudes of reference signals for the LVDTs. According to labels attached to signals generators:
    • PR2: 6 Vpp.
    • PR3 and PRM: 7 Vpp.


/!\ End of edit conflict


Type-C

Controls

Electronics

Towards O4

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

The week from 10/19

  • Takahashi: 10/19-10/23

The week from 10/26

  • Hirata: ?

Next meeting

  • On 2020/10/23(Fri)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20201016 (last edited 2020-10-16 15:48:19 by RyutaroTakahashi)