|
Size: 4720
Comment:
|
Size: 6720
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 10: | Line 10: |
| Participants : | Participants : |
| Line 20: | Line 20: |
| * Corrugate tube fixing jig: | * Corrugate tube fixing jig: |
| Line 30: | Line 30: |
| Line 36: | Line 35: |
| Participants: | Participants: |
| Line 43: | Line 42: |
| * Type-A team: 3/15-16 connection of cryo-payload in EX. 3/17- go back to EY | * Type-A team: 3/15-16 connection of cryo-payload in EX. 3/17- go back to EY |
| Line 48: | Line 47: |
| Line 49: | Line 49: |
| * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16142|16142]] IP and F0 stepper motor limit switches. , __fabian.arellano__ | * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16142|16142]] IP and F0 stepper motor limit switches. , __fabian.arellano__ |
| Line 52: | Line 52: |
| Line 53: | Line 54: |
| Line 54: | Line 56: |
| Line 55: | Line 58: |
| Line 57: | Line 61: |
| * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16118|16118]] Setup of filter chain , __ryutaro.takahashi__ | * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16118|16118]] Setup of filter chain , __ryutaro.takahashi__ |
| Line 60: | Line 64: |
| * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16185|16185]] Added MN/PF OpLev to k1visitmxp's Model file. , __satoru.ikeda__ | * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16185|16185]] Added MN/PF OpLev to k1visitmxp's Model file. , __satoru.ikeda__ |
| Line 63: | Line 67: |
| Line 64: | Line 69: |
| Line 66: | Line 72: |
| Line 67: | Line 74: |
| * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16157|16157]] Investigation of IMC suspensions , __ryutaro.takahashi__ | * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16157|16157]] Investigation of IMC suspensions , __ryutaro.takahashi__ |
| Line 74: | Line 82: |
| Line 75: | Line 84: |
| * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15976|15976]] Picomotor of PR3_BF_T(Motor2) got stuck , __satoru.ikeda__ | * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=15976|15976]] Picomotor of PR3_BF_T(Motor2) got stuck , __satoru.ikeda__ |
| Line 89: | Line 99: |
| PR3 * At the begining of the week the IM was still touching the IRM. * First we did a health check of the IM-Y picomotor because I had the impression it had reached a limit. * We locked the BF and pushed the IRM in yaw such that the IM was hanging free. * We actuated in yaw using the picomotor and it moved freely suggesting it had not reached its limit. * With confidence in the picomotor condition we proceeded to adjust yaw and pitch until the IM became free although the OSEM flags were not at the centres of their cavities. * Measurements of IM TFs revealed the system was healthy. (IM-V TF was not measured because the SF is locked due to the plastic cover.) * '''Happily, we can consider the system to be recovered from the jammed-BF-picomotor-earthqueake event.''' * Later we moved the IM picomotors in order to move the OSEM flags closer to centers of their cavities.However, this rendered H3 out of range. * The locked theIRM and the IM and moved H3 into range, but when we released the system we realized V1 had become out of range due to a change in pitch. * We measured transfer functions with the horizontal OSEMs and they were all good. * We proceeded with the Trump method to test the pitch stability: * We carried out the procedure from the control room and used the readout from V2 and V3 (V1 out of range) and the 3D-CAD to calculate the change in pitch: '''-3.9 mrad''' ('''consistent with what was measured with an oplev when we disturbed the suspension when we glued the wire'''). * In the tunnel we carried out the procedure again and used an oplev to measure a change of '''33.4 mrad'''. '''See the videos'''. * For the same event we used the V2 and V3 OSEMs to estimate the change in pitch of the IM: '''4.1 mrad''' '''(consistent with previous measurements).''' * Today we inspected the payload visually. * We didn't find anything wrong. * Only H2 flag rotated during the Trump procedure. See pictures. |
Contents
Agenda/Minutes
CRY+VIS Interface Meeting
Date : 13:30-
Participants :
Schedule
- IX: Oplev setting by 3/10. F0 and IP were tuned.
- IY: Cryo-payload was removed on 3/11.
- EX: Connection is scheduled in the next week.
Status
- Corrugate tube fixing jig:
- Commissioning in air: From June for IX?
- Commissioning in vacuum:
- Acceptance check: Cryo-payload in IX/EX and Type-A tower in EY/IX are on going.
- PF actuator: Not evaluated in IX, but after the commissioning for suspension.
- Jig for FC painting:
- Overall commissioning: Schedule meeting after JPS meeting.
- Procedure of TM height setting:
Discussion
VIS Meeting
14:00-
Participants:
Schedule
* The next week
- Type-A team: 3/15-16 connection of cryo-payload in EX. 3/17- go back to EY
- Type-B team: 3/15-19 remedy of IY or still PR3 setting.
klog
EX
16183 Cleaning and transportation of components. , fabian.arellano
16142 IP and F0 stepper motor limit switches. , fabian.arellano
General
16200 Recovery of the signal generators in Type-B and Type-Bp suspensions. , fabian.arellano
IX
16185 Added MN/PF OpLev to k1visitmxp's Model file. , satoru.ikeda
16199 Setup of IP , ryutaro.takahashi
16118 Setup of filter chain , ryutaro.takahashi
16185 Added MN/PF OpLev to k1visitmxp's Model file. , satoru.ikeda
IY
- 16214 Preparation for disconnection of cryo-payload , ryutaro.takahashi
- 16217 Support for common Payload/Tower model files: Type-A (ITMY) is supported to TOWER_MASTER/PAYLOAD_MASTER. , satoru.ikeda
MCF
16157 Investigation of IMC suspensions , ryutaro.takahashi
PR3
15976 Picomotor of PR3_BF_T(Motor2) got stuck , satoru.ikeda
This is generated by python script in /users/Miyo/dropbox/Script/scrapping/main.py.
Summary Report
TypeA
- Disconnected the cryo-payload in IY.
- Setup the F0 and tuned the IP in IX.
TypeB
TypeBp
PR3
- At the begining of the week the IM was still touching the IRM.
- First we did a health check of the IM-Y picomotor because I had the impression it had reached a limit.
- We locked the BF and pushed the IRM in yaw such that the IM was hanging free.
- We actuated in yaw using the picomotor and it moved freely suggesting it had not reached its limit.
- With confidence in the picomotor condition we proceeded to adjust yaw and pitch until the IM became free although the OSEM flags were not at the centres of their cavities.
- Measurements of IM TFs revealed the system was healthy. (IM-V TF was not measured because the SF is locked due to the plastic cover.)
Happily, we can consider the system to be recovered from the jammed-BF-picomotor-earthqueake event.
- Later we moved the IM picomotors in order to move the OSEM flags closer to centers of their cavities.However, this rendered H3 out of range.
- The locked theIRM and the IM and moved H3 into range, but when we released the system we realized V1 had become out of range due to a change in pitch.
- We measured transfer functions with the horizontal OSEMs and they were all good.
- We proceeded with the Trump method to test the pitch stability:
We carried out the procedure from the control room and used the readout from V2 and V3 (V1 out of range) and the 3D-CAD to calculate the change in pitch: -3.9 mrad (consistent with what was measured with an oplev when we disturbed the suspension when we glued the wire).
In the tunnel we carried out the procedure again and used an oplev to measure a change of 33.4 mrad. See the videos.
For the same event we used the V2 and V3 OSEMs to estimate the change in pitch of the IM: 4.1 mrad (consistent with previous measurements).
- Today we inspected the payload visually.
- We didn't find anything wrong.
- Only H2 flag rotated during the Trump procedure. See pictures.
TypeC
Electronics
- [Takahashi] Connected the release sensors to the DGS using the exchange cables in IY.
Control
Safety
Discussion
Travel Plans
The week from 3/15
- Takahashi: 3/15-18
- Sato: 3/15-19
- Hirata: 3/15-19
- Yano: 3/15-19
The week from 3/22
- Takahashi: 3/22-3/26
- Sato: 3/22-3/26
- Hirata: 3/22-3/26
- Yano: 3/22-3/26
Next meeting
- 2021/3/19(FRI)