Differences between revisions 1 and 9 (spanning 8 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2021-03-16 08:46:37
Size: 6652
Editor: KousekiMiyo
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2021-03-18 19:07:44
Size: 3758
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
Participants : Takahashi, Ikeda, Ohashi, Kimura, Aso, Hirata, Sato, Ushiba, Tomaru, Akutsu, Miyo
Participants :
Line 15: Line 14:
 * IX: Oplev setting will be carried out after the next week. F0 and IP were tuned. Yaw will be adjusted after rough alignment.
 * IY: Cryo-payload was removed on 3/11.
 * EX: Connection is scheduled in the next week
.
 * EY: Cryo-payload was removed on 3/12. Cable treatment is necessary.
 * IX: Oplev setting will be carried out in the next week. Yaw will be adjusted after rough alignment.
 * IY:
 * EX:
Cryo-payload was installed. Release is scheduled on 3/22.
 * EY: Installation of the F1 stage was started.
Line 21: Line 20:
 * Corrugate tube fixing jig: The spacer is modified. They should be prepared by mid. May.  * Corrugate tube fixing jig: They will be prepared by the end of May.
Line 36: Line 35:
Participants: Takahashi, Fabian, Hirata, Miyo, Tanaka, Sato, Washimi, Terrence, Aso Participants:
Line 43: Line 42:
 * Type-A team: 3/15-16 connection of cryo-payload in EX. 3/17- go back to EY
 * Type-B team: 3/15-19 PR3 setting. Remedy work of IY will be postponed.
 * Type-A team: 3/22-26 installation in EY. 3/23 F0 tuning in EX.
 * Type-B team: 3/22-26 Remedy in PR3.
Line 73: Line 72:
 * Disconnected the cryo-payload in IY.
 * Setup the F0 and tuned the IP in IX.
 * Connected the cryo-payload to the BF. The load for BF was roughly adjusted. The F1, F3, BF are working. The F0 overloads by 13kg.
 * Started the setup of F1.
Line 78: Line 76:
PR3

 * At the begining of the week the IM was still touching the IRM.
 * First we did a health check of the IM-Y picomotor because I had the impression it had reached a limit.
  * We locked the BF and pushed the IRM in yaw such that the IM was hanging free.
  * We actuated in yaw using the picomotor and it moved freely suggesting it had not reached its limit.
 * With confidence in the picomotor condition we proceeded to adjust yaw and pitch until the IM became free although the OSEM flags were not at the centres of their cavities.
 * Measurements of IM TFs revealed the system was healthy. (IM-V TF was not measured because the SF is locked due to the plastic cover.)
 * '''Happily, we can consider the system to be recovered from the jammed-BF-picomotor-earthqueake event.'''
 * Later we moved the IM picomotors in order to move the OSEM flags closer to centers of their cavities.However, this rendered H3 out of range.
 * The locked theIRM and the IM and moved H3 into range, but when we released the system we realized V1 had become out of range due to a change in pitch.
 * We measured transfer functions with the horizontal OSEMs and they were all good.
 * We proceeded with the Trump method to test the pitch stability:
  * We carried out the procedure from the control room and used the readout from V2 and V3 (V1 out of range) and the 3D-CAD to calculate the change in pitch: '''-3.9 mrad''' ('''consistent with what was measured with an oplev when we disturbed the suspension when we glued the wire''').
  * In the tunnel we carried out the procedure again and used an oplev to measure a change of '''33.4 mrad'''. '''See the videos'''.
  * For the same event we used the V2 and V3 OSEMs to estimate the change in pitch of the IM: '''4.1 mrad''' '''(consistent with previous measurements).'''
 * Today we inspected the payload visually.
  * We didn't find anything wrong.
  * Only H2 flag rotated during the Trump procedure. See pictures.
Line 99: Line 77:
 * [Miyo] We have to resolve the picomotor range probblem before closing MCE and MCF chambers.
 * [Miyo] We will start the suspension commissioning work including the oplev calibration in next week.
 * [Takahashi] The pushing point for yaw picomotor will be extended with spacer in MCo.
Line 104: Line 78:
 * [Takahashi] Connected the release sensors to the DGS using the exchange cables in IY.
Line 107: Line 79:
 * [Ikeda] Add new RTM block of additional MN and PF OpLevs of Cryo-payload in the current RTM.
 * [Ikeda] ITMY is updated with new RTM.
 * [Ikeda] Now, the old RTM used in O3 is only installed on BS and PR3. Please see [[http://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/RealTimeModel#RTM_Status|Wiki]]
Line 114: Line 82:
The week from 3/15

 * Takahashi: 3/15-18
 * Sato: 3/15-19
 * Hirata: 3/15-19
 * Yano: 3/15-19
Line 128: Line 89:
The week from 3/29

 * Takahashi: 3/29-4/2
 * Sato: 3/29-4/2
 * Hirata: 3/29-4/2
 * Yano: 3/29-4/2
Line 129: Line 97:
 * 2021/3/19(FRI)  * 2021/3/26(FRI)

Agenda/Minutes

Zoom Meeting


CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

Date : 13:30-

Participants : Post O3 Upgrade portal

Schedule

  • IX: Oplev setting will be carried out in the next week. Yaw will be adjusted after rough alignment.
  • IY:
  • EX: Cryo-payload was installed. Release is scheduled on 3/22.
  • EY: Installation of the F1 stage was started.

Status

  • Corrugate tube fixing jig: They will be prepared by the end of May.
  • Commissioning in air: From mid. May for IX.
  • Commissioning in vacuum:
  • Acceptance check: Cryo-payload in IX/EX and Type-A tower in EY/IX are on going.
  • PF actuator: Not evaluated in IX, but after the commissioning for suspension.
  • Jig for FC painting:
  • Overall commissioning: Schedule meeting on 3/22.
  • Procedure of TM height setting:

Discussion


VIS Meeting

14:00-

Participants:

Schedule

Schedule

* The next week

  • Type-A team: 3/22-26 installation in EY. 3/23 F0 tuning in EX.
  • Type-B team: 3/22-26 Remedy in PR3.

Klog

EX

  • (!) 16260 Connection of cryo-payload , ryutaro.takahashi

General

  • 16252 Common Type-C(OMMT1,OMMT2,OSTM) model. , satoru.ikeda

  • 16234 Common Type-C(MCI,MCE,MCO,IMMT1,IMMT2) model. , satoru.ikeda

    • (!) 16261 Comment , satoru.ikeda

  • 16252 Common Type-C(OMMT1,OMMT2,OSTM) model. , satoru.ikeda

    • (!) 16262 Comment , satoru.ikeda

IY

  • 16249 Connection of release sensors to DGS , ryutaro.takahashi

  • 16091 Monitoring of IP by ITMY venting , satoru.ikeda

    • 16248 Comment , satoru.ikeda

  • 16249 Connection of release sensors to DGS , ryutaro.takahashi

    • 16251 Comment , naohisa.satou

MCF

  • 16242 MCi and MCo oplev TX replacing , tomotada.akutsu

PR3

  • (!) 16258 Setting the alignment of PR3. , fabian.arellano

  • 16239 Test of PR3 mirror pitch stability using the Donald Trump method. , fabian.arellano

    • 16247 Comment , fabian.arellano

    • 16246 Comment , fabian.arellano

This is generated by python script in /users/Miyo/dropbox/Script/scrapping/main.py.

Summary Report

TypeA

  • Connected the cryo-payload to the BF. The load for BF was roughly adjusted. The F1, F3, BF are working. The F0 overloads by 13kg.
  • Started the setup of F1.

TypeB

TypeBp

TypeC

Electronics

Control

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

The week from 3/22

  • Takahashi: 3/22-3/26
  • Sato: 3/22-3/26
  • Hirata: 3/22-3/26
  • Yano: 3/22-3/26

The week from 3/29

  • Takahashi: 3/29-4/2
  • Sato: 3/29-4/2
  • Hirata: 3/29-4/2
  • Yano: 3/29-4/2

Next meeting

  • 2021/3/26(FRI)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20210319 (last edited 2021-03-19 15:50:29 by RyutaroTakahashi)