Differences between revisions 6 and 7
Revision 6 as of 2021-04-08 19:23:17
Size: 3803
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2021-04-09 13:07:08
Size: 5119
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
Participants :  Participants :
Line 38: Line 38:
Participants:  Participants:
Line 64: Line 64:
 * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16378|16378]] F0 tuning , __ryutaro.takahashi__ 
* [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16378|16378]] F0 tuning , __ryutaro.takahashi__
Line 66: Line 67:
Line 67: Line 69:
Line 70: Line 73:
 * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16391|16391]] Supported for common Payload model files: Type-Bp(PR3) to PAYLOAD_MASTER , __satoru.ikeda__   * [[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=16391|16391]] Supported for common Payload model files: Type-Bp(PR3) to PAYLOAD_MASTER , __satoru.ikeda__
Line 72: Line 75:
Line 73: Line 77:
Line 74: Line 79:
Line 75: Line 81:
Line 82: Line 89:
=== TypeBp === === Type-Bp PR2 ===
This week we inspected and tightened the wires clapms in PR2. We followed the same procedure as in PR3, so I won't write any details here.

 * We removed the IRM side panels and measure the gaps in different places using thickness gauges:
  * Largest gap: 220 um close the wire, but smaller exactly where the wire is.
  * Smallest gap: (50 , 60 ) um.
 * We tightened the clamps according to the specification: 10 Nm for the weight holding ones and 2 Nm for the locating ones.
  * 10 out of 12 screws rotated by small amounts when tightened, however,
  * The two screws of the locating clamp at the +Y side were completely loose.
 * After we re-assembled and released the payload we realized it had a lot of negative pitch (I wrote positive in the klog, sorry) and at least one OSEM flag was touching.
  * We corrected the pitch with the picomotor.
  * We also moved the BF keystone close to nominal position with the fishing rod.
  * Then we corrected IM yaw.
 * We found picomotor cables and stepper motor cables disconnected, so we connected them.
 * By the end of today's work the IM seemed to be hanging free.
 * We tried to measure TFs, but it seems the actuation is not going through because of a problem in the real-time model. Miyo-kun and Ikeda-san will take a look.

Agenda/Minutes

Zoom Meeting


CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

Date : 13:30-

Participants :

Post O3 Upgrade portal

Schedule

  • IX: Oplev will be finalized in April. Height and alignment adjustments are on going. ACC will be installed in April.
    • Investigation of the behavior of BF.
    • Wide range FR for the F0.
    • Adjustment of the height of pre-isolator using the piston.
  • IY: Remedy of the pre-isolator is scheduled in April.
  • EX: Oplev setting is on going.
  • EY: Installation of the tower will be restarted in May. Removing of the maraging rod is necessary.

Status

  • Corrugate tube fixing jig: They will be prepared by the end of May.
  • Commissioning in air: From mid. May for IX.
  • Commissioning in vacuum:
  • Acceptance check: Check items for in-air commissioning should be confirmed on the payload.
  • PF actuator: After the commissioning for suspension.
  • Jig for FC painting:
  • Overall commissioning:
  • Procedure of TM height setting: Prepare for the measurement in the first in-vacuum commissioning in IX.

Discussion


VIS Meeting

14:30-

Participants:

Schedule

See Schedule

  • Type-A team: IXV 4/13-16
  • Type-B team: PR2 4/13-16

Milestone

  • IMC suspensions are ready in air [40] will finish 2011/04/21.

  • PRs are ready in air [643] will finish 2011/07/09.

  • ETMX is ready in air [656] will finish 2021/08/25.

  • ITMX is ready in air [657] will finish 2021/08/31.

  • ETMY is ready in air [658] will finish 2021/09/16.

  • ITMY is ready in air [659] will finish 2021/11/08.

  • BS is ready in air [691] will finish 2011/11/24.

  • SRs are ready in air [663] will finish 2011/12/20.

  • Output suspensions are ready in air [695] will finish 2011/12/21.

  • TMSY is ready in air [708] will finish 2011/??/??.

  • TMSX is ready in air [684] will finish 2011/??/??.

2021/03/29

Klog

EX

  • 16378 F0 tuning , ryutaro.takahashi

  • 16382 Comment , ryutaro.takahashi

General

  • 16383 Fixed that ACC and VEL of Picomotor Ch1 was different from other Ch2 to 4. , satoru.ikeda

  • 16391 Supported for common Payload model files: Type-Bp(PR3) to PAYLOAD_MASTER , satoru.ikeda

  • (!) 16402 Change the name of EPICS channel in MASTERSWITCH , satoru.ikeda

  • 16391 Supported for common Payload model files: Type-Bp(PR3) to PAYLOAD_MASTER , satoru.ikeda

  • (!) 16401 Comment , satoru.ikeda

MCF

  • (!) 16405 Unable to connect Picomotor in MCO , satoru.ikeda

PR2

  • (!) 16406 Inspection of locating wire inner clamps , fabian.arellano

This is generated by python script in /users/Miyo/dropbox/Script/scrapping/main.py.

Summary Report

TypeA

TypeB

Type-Bp PR2

This week we inspected and tightened the wires clapms in PR2. We followed the same procedure as in PR3, so I won't write any details here.

  • We removed the IRM side panels and measure the gaps in different places using thickness gauges:
    • Largest gap: 220 um close the wire, but smaller exactly where the wire is.
    • Smallest gap: (50 , 60 ) um.
  • We tightened the clamps according to the specification: 10 Nm for the weight holding ones and 2 Nm for the locating ones.
    • 10 out of 12 screws rotated by small amounts when tightened, however,
    • The two screws of the locating clamp at the +Y side were completely loose.
  • After we re-assembled and released the payload we realized it had a lot of negative pitch (I wrote positive in the klog, sorry) and at least one OSEM flag was touching.
    • We corrected the pitch with the picomotor.
    • We also moved the BF keystone close to nominal position with the fishing rod.
    • Then we corrected IM yaw.
  • We found picomotor cables and stepper motor cables disconnected, so we connected them.
  • By the end of today's work the IM seemed to be hanging free.
  • We tried to measure TFs, but it seems the actuation is not going through because of a problem in the real-time model. Miyo-kun and Ikeda-san will take a look.

TypeC

Electronics

Control

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

The week from 4/12

  • Takahashi: 4/12-16
  • Sato: 4/12-16
  • Hirata: 4/12-16

The week from 4/19

  • Takahashi: 4/19-23
  • Sato: 4/19-23
  • Hirata: 4/19-23

Next meeting

  • 2021/4/16(FRI)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20210409 (last edited 2021-04-09 13:31:09 by KousekiMiyo)