Differences between revisions 10 and 16 (spanning 6 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 10 as of 2021-12-24 12:49:06 →
Size: 2858
Editor: RyutaroTakahashi
Comment:
← Revision 16 as of 2021-12-24 14:30:35 → ⇥
Size: 4647
Editor: RyutaroTakahashi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 8: Line 8:
Date: 2021/12/24 13:00- Date: 2021/12/24 13:00-13:35
Line 10: Line 10:
Participants: Participants: Takahashi, Aso, Ushiba, Ikeda, Sato, Akutsu, Uchiyama
Line 15: Line 15:
 * IX: Pump down on 12/23. Glich in the F3 signals.
 * EX: In vacuum.		  * IX: Pump down on 12/23. Investigating the glich in the F3 signals. Go to the health check.
 * EX: In vacuum. Go to the health check.
Line 18: Line 18:
 * EY: Recovery of the BF problem.  * EY: Recovery of the BF problem. Implementing the damping controls.
Line 28: Line 28:
 * Acceptance check:   * Acceptance check:
Line 30: Line 30:
 * New vacuum pumps for V-chambers:   * New vacuum pumps for V-chambers:
Line 32: Line 32:
 * Power source for Oplev:  * Power source for Oplev: SLD was broken due to pulling the cables.
Line 37: Line 37:
Date: 2021/12/24 14:00- Date: 2021/12/24 14:00-14:25
Line 39: Line 39:
Participants: Participants: Takahashi, Fabian, Sato, Terrence, Aso, Ushiba, Ishizaki, Uchiyama
Line 45: Line 45:
 
Line 48: Line 48:
  * IP H1 H2 and H3 coils are all inverted. [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19295|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19295]]
  * F2, F3, BF GAS coils are inverted. [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19303|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19303]]
  * BF V1, V3, H2 coils are inverted. [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19309|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19309]]
  * Is there any reason why some of them are inverted? The coil output gains are now kind of messy.
 * IP LVDT sensing and actuation diagonalization. [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19301|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19301]], [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19302|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19302]]		   * IP H1 H2 and H3 coils are all inverted. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19295
  * F2, F3, BF GAS coils are inverted. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19303
  * BF V1, V3, H2 coils are inverted. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19309
  * Is there any reason why some of them are inverted? The coil output gains are now kind of messy.
 * IP LVDT sensing and actuation diagonalization. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19301, https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=19302
Line 54: Line 54:
  * BF LVDT readouts are very large, they read a few thousand um/urad. Are they calibrated?
   * Some GAS filters are some thousand microns away from the setpoint. Can I simply use the stepper motors to offload them? Is there anything I should pay attention to?
   * What is the oscillation/pump at 20 mHz? It appears in many DoFs, e.g. IP L, BF L. (except GAS DoFs).		   * BF LVDT readouts are very large, they read a few thousand um/urad. Are they calibrated?
  * Some GAS filters are some thousand microns away from the setpoint. Can I simply use the stepper motors to offload them? Is there anything I should pay attention to?
  * What is the oscillation/pump at 20 mHz? It appears in many DoFs, e.g. IP L, BF L. (except GAS DoFs).
Line 58: Line 59:
Line 60: Line 62:
==== PR2 ====
We glued back the magnets onto the mirror.

 * It was not necessary to remove the mid-size baffle. It was possible to do visual inspection of magnets within coil bodies with an inspection mirror.
 * Because the RM is not designed to be a positioning jig for the mirror, a concern was the relative alignment of the two bodies.
  * The method that we used was to release both bodies and lock them, as much as possible, to the position in which they hung free.
  * Despite the absence of two magnets, this method work, likely because the any imbalance affects the RM and mirror in equal amounts becuase they both hang from the IM.
 * During the course of this work, we security structie locking screws were withdrawn by defined distances, not like before.
 * After the gluing, procedure I measured a few transfer functions of the IM and the sysytem seemed to be healthy. '''However, we should do a more comprenhensive set of measurements.''' I didn't do it becuase IFO alignment has a higher priority.

==== PRM ====
During IFO alignment work, we realized the traverser was far away from its centre. Likely, a similar error as PR2 one was made in PRM on Thursday last week.

 * At the begining it moved, but later it jammed.
 * We realized the problem was that some locking assemblies had not been removed and two of them seemed locked. It seems no other suspension has this locking system.
 * We removed them and the traverser now moved smoothly.
 * During the course of this work, we security structie locking screws were withdrawn by defined distances, not like before.

'''It would be good to buy more sligs so we don't have to go back and forth between clean booths to pick them up, please.'''
Line 67: Line 89:
 * Type-B team:  * Type-B team: Calibrate BF LVDT in BS

Contents

  1. Agenda/Minutes
  2. CRY+VIS Interface Meeting
    1. Schedule
    2. Status
    3. Discussion
  3. VIS Meeting
    1. Summary Report
      1. Type-A
      2. Type-B
      3. Type-Bp
      4. Type-C
      5. Electronics
      6. Control
    2. Schedule
    3. Safety
    4. Discussion
    5. Travel Plans
    6. Next meeting

Agenda/Minutes

Zoom Meeting

CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

Date: 2021/12/24 13:00-13:35

Participants: Takahashi, Aso, Ushiba, Ikeda, Sato, Akutsu, Uchiyama

Post O3 Upgrade portal

Schedule

  • IX: Pump down on 12/23. Investigating the glich in the F3 signals. Go to the health check.
  • EX: In vacuum. Go to the health check.
  • IY:
  • EY: Recovery of the BF problem. Implementing the damping controls.

Status

  • Replacement of flip cables:
  • TM height setting: ITMY.
  • Oplev: Setup of the TM Oplev in IY after the TM alignment.
  • ACC: Experiments in IX/EX. Assembly for EY.
  • Commissioning in air: Return of GRY.
  • Commissioning in vacuum: Pump down of IXC/IXV on 12/23.
  • Overall commissioning:
  • Acceptance check:
  • PF actuator: At the in-vacuum commissioning.
  • New vacuum pumps for V-chambers:
  • Heater control:
  • Power source for Oplev: SLD was broken due to pulling the cables.

Discussion

VIS Meeting

Date: 2021/12/24 14:00-14:25

Participants: Takahashi, Fabian, Sato, Terrence, Aso, Ushiba, Ishizaki, Uchiyama

Summary Report

Type-A

  • Monitored and offloaded the displacement of the IXV during the pump down.
  • Investigating the glitch of F3 signals in IX.

ETMY

.

Type-B

Type-Bp

PR2

We glued back the magnets onto the mirror.

  • It was not necessary to remove the mid-size baffle. It was possible to do visual inspection of magnets within coil bodies with an inspection mirror.
  • Because the RM is not designed to be a positioning jig for the mirror, a concern was the relative alignment of the two bodies.
    • The method that we used was to release both bodies and lock them, as much as possible, to the position in which they hung free.
    • Despite the absence of two magnets, this method work, likely because the any imbalance affects the RM and mirror in equal amounts becuase they both hang from the IM.
  • During the course of this work, we security structie locking screws were withdrawn by defined distances, not like before.

  • After the gluing, procedure I measured a few transfer functions of the IM and the sysytem seemed to be healthy. However, we should do a more comprenhensive set of measurements. I didn't do it becuase IFO alignment has a higher priority.

PRM

During IFO alignment work, we realized the traverser was far away from its centre. Likely, a similar error as PR2 one was made in PRM on Thursday last week.

  • At the begining it moved, but later it jammed.
  • We realized the problem was that some locking assemblies had not been removed and two of them seemed locked. It seems no other suspension has this locking system.
  • We removed them and the traverser now moved smoothly.
  • During the course of this work, we security structie locking screws were withdrawn by defined distances, not like before.

It would be good to buy more sligs so we don't have to go back and forth between clean booths to pick them up, please.

Type-C

Electronics

Control

Schedule

See Schedule

  • Type-A team: ACC in EY, Heter test in IXV/EXV
  • Type-B team: Calibrate BF LVDT in BS

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

(Date in Kamioka)

The week from 12/27

(Holidays in 12/29-1/3)

The week from 1/4

  • Takahashi: 1/5-7
  • Sato: 1/5-7
  • Hirata: 1/5-7

Next meeting

  • 2022/1/7(FRI)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20211224 (last edited 2021-12-24 14:30:35 by RyutaroTakahashi)