Differences between revisions 14 and 15
Revision 14 as of 2021-12-24 13:41:50
Size: 4552
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2021-12-24 14:29:33
Size: 4623
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 37: Line 37:
Date: 2021/12/24 14:00- Date: 2021/12/24 14:00-14:25
Line 39: Line 39:
Participants: Participants: Takahashi, Fabian, Sato, Terrence, Aso, Ushiba, Ishizaki, Uchiyama
Line 65: Line 65:
 * It  was not necessary to remove the mid-size baffle. It was possible to do visual inspection of magnets within coil bodies with an inspection mirror.  * It was not necessary to remove the mid-size baffle. It was possible to do visual inspection of magnets within coil bodies with an inspection mirror.

Agenda/Minutes

Zoom Meeting


CRY+VIS Interface Meeting

Date: 2021/12/24 13:00-13:35

Participants: Takahashi, Aso, Ushiba, Ikeda, Sato, Akutsu, Uchiyama

Post O3 Upgrade portal

Schedule

  • IX: Pump down on 12/23. Investigating the glich in the F3 signals. Go to the health check.
  • EX: In vacuum. Go to the health check.
  • IY:
  • EY: Recovery of the BF problem. Implementing the damping controls.

Status

  • Replacement of flip cables:
  • TM height setting: ITMY.
  • Oplev: Setup of the TM Oplev in IY after the TM alignment.
  • ACC: Experiments in IX/EX. Assembly for EY.
  • Commissioning in air: Return of GRY.
  • Commissioning in vacuum: Pump down of IXC/IXV on 12/23.
  • Overall commissioning:
  • Acceptance check:
  • PF actuator: At the in-vacuum commissioning.
  • New vacuum pumps for V-chambers:
  • Heater control:
  • Power source for Oplev: SLD was broken due to pulling the cables.

Discussion


VIS Meeting

Date: 2021/12/24 14:00-14:25

Participants: Takahashi, Fabian, Sato, Terrence, Aso, Ushiba, Ishizaki, Uchiyama

Summary Report

Type-A

  • Monitored and offloaded the displacement of the IXV during the pump down.
  • Investigating the glitch of F3 signals in IX.

ETMY

.

Type-B

Type-Bp

PR2

We glued back the magnets onto the mirror.

  • It was not necessary to remove the mid-size baffle. It was possible to do visual inspection of magnets within coil bodies with an inspection mirror.
  • Because the RM is not designed to be a positioning jig for the mirror, a concern was the relative alignment of the two bodies.
    • The method that we used was to release both bodies and lock them, as much as possible, to the position in which they hung free.
    • Despite the absence of two magnets, this method work, likely because the any imbalance affects the RM and mirror in equal amounts becuase they both hang from the IM.
  • During the course of this work, we security structie locking screws were withdrawn by defined distances, not like before.
  • After the gluing, procedure I measured a few transfer functions of the IM and the sysytem seemed to be healthy. However, we should do a more comprenhensive set of measurements. I didn't do it becuase IFO alignment has a higher priority.

PRM

During IFO alignment work, we realized the traverser was far away from its centre. Likely, a similar error as PR2 one was made in PRM on Thursday last week.

  • At the begining it moved, but later it jammed.
  • We realized the problem was that some locking assemblies had not been removed and two of them seemed locked. It seems no other suspension has this locking system.
  • We removed them and the traverser now moved smoothly.
  • During the course of this work, we security structie locking screws were withdrawn by defined distances, not like before.

It would be good to buy more sligs so we don't have to go back and forth between clean booths to pick them up, please.

Type-C

Electronics

Control

Schedule

See Schedule

  • Type-A team: ACC in EY, Heter test in IXV/EXV
  • Type-B team:

Safety

Discussion

Travel Plans

(Date in Kamioka)

The week from 12/27

(Holidays in 12/29-1/3)

The week from 1/4

  • Takahashi: 1/5-7
  • Sato: 1/5-7
  • Hirata: 1/5-7

Next meeting

  • 2022/1/7(FRI)

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20211224 (last edited 2021-12-24 14:30:35 by RyutaroTakahashi)