Differences between revisions 1 and 2
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2024-09-12 09:02:25 →
Size: 891
Editor: RyutaroTakahashi
Comment:
← Revision 2 as of 2024-09-12 09:47:08 → ⇥
Size: 950
Editor: RyutaroTakahashi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:
  * The performance of the 1 or 2-layer stack was tested in TAMA.   * The performance of the 1 or 2-layer stack was tested in TAMA ([[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=31004|klog]]).
Line 26: Line 26:
  * Ask ATC to modify the design of the TMS isolator.   * Asking ATC to modify the design of the TMS isolator.

Contents

  1. VIS Meeting
    1. Topics
      1. Type-A
      2. Type-B/Bp
      3. Type-C
      4. R&D
    2. Discussion
    3. Next meeting

VIS Meeting

Date: 2024/9/13 10:00-

Zoom

Participants:

Topics

Type-A

  • IP controls using ACCs

    • 50mHz blending without the ACCs is working in EY. The sensor correction was tuned (klog)).

    • Investigation of the FLDACC performance in EY. Making the noise budgets.

Type-B/Bp

  • BF (IRM) damper for Type-B.
  • IP for Type-Bp.

Type-C

  • OMC stack

    • The performance of the 1 or 2-layer stack was tested in TAMA (klog).

    • Investigation of soft rubbers towards O5.
  • Active isolation table for OMC.
    • Asking ATC to modify the design of the TMS isolator.

R&D

  • Protection from earthquakes
    • Application for R7 Kakenhi has been submitted.

Discussion

Next meeting

  • 2024/9/27 10:00-

KAGRA/Subgroups/VIS/VISMinutes20240913 (last edited 2024-09-13 10:41:12 by RyutaroTakahashi)