Size: 9768
Comment:
|
Size: 8458
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
== Minutes == * bKAGRA Phase 1 commissioning [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5595|JGW-T1605595]] * UPDATE: no PR-related adjustments before Michelson operation * Arai and Aso agreed * MIF recommend not to install Pcal at Phase 1 considering tight schedule * '''check if transmitted beam can go through when ETM is not installed [Michimura -> Saito, Uchiyama, Kimura]''' * check if EXC-EXT (EYC-EYT) ducts are installed considering ETM wedge * wide/narrow angle baffles for Phase 1? * install if schedule permits; check with Uchiyama [Akutsu] * INTERFACE: Pcal and narrow angle baffles * how to see the HR surface of ETM? [Akutsu, Inoue] * we need to see ETM HR surface for the beam alignment and Pcal spot position monitor * we have viewports to see HR surface at 45 deg; but wide angle baffle can be an obstacle * holes for wide angle baffles? * camera with telescope from EXA/EYA? * since angle is too narrow, scattering maybe too low, and cannot see from cameras? -> '''calculation [Akutsu]''' |
== Agenda == * MIR update [Hirose] * coated PRM reflectivity acceptable? * required spec was 10 +0.1 % / -0 %, but measured value was 10.35 % |
Line 26: | Line 14: |
* bKAGRA Phase 1 electronics * electronics for IMC WFS are most urgent (we need them by the end of Oct 2016) * RF amps for Distribution Amplifier not yet arrived * need to check RF QPDs [Niigata U?] * IR LED is at Kamioka, no network analyzer at Kamioka (one at Toyama U and the other at Kashiwa) * still, we can tune the resonance with IR LED or test inputs * Aperture of sapphire test mass * recoil mass aperture is OK for diffraction loss and scattering noise * what is the baffle aperture? * see Fig 2 of [[https://www.osapublishing.org/ome/fulltext.cfm?uri=ome-6-5-1613&id=339003|Optical Materials Express 6, 1613 (2016)]] * #1 arm-duct baffles 720 mm dia. * #2 cryo-duct shields 270 mm dia. * #3 narrow angle baffles 254 mm dia. [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4223|JGW-D1504223]] * #4 wide angle baffles '''not decided''' * if smaller than 169 mm, loss will be larger than 10 ppm, and should be considered * if larger than 191 mm (larger than recoil mass aperture), no problem at all * MIR update [Hirose via Email] * test plate of IMMT1 was characterized; modifying RoC a little for IMMT1&2 based on the information * coated optics will be characterized once they finish coating == Agenda == |
|
Line 51: | Line 16: |
* UPDATE: no PR-related adjustments before Michelson operation | |
Line 55: | Line 19: |
* trouble on number of licenses and library links, but finally able to run example model | |
Line 63: | Line 28: |
* procedure summarized in [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5692|JGW-T1605692]] | * procedure summarized in [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5692|JGW-T1605692]] {*} * presented at Chief Meeting on Sept 26 * '''TMS BRT alignment could be tough''' because of dim transmitted beam after ETM installation * use green? * '''check optical layout [Michimura->Aso]''' * check if ETM transmitted beam can go through when ETM is not installed [Michimura] {*} * ETM transmitted beam can reach EXT/EYT when no wedge (5.6 mm shifted from the center of EXT/EYT) * EXT/EYT is installed considering ETM wedge effect * wide/narrow angle baffles for Phase 1? [Akutsu] {*} * talk with Uchiyama & Saito on Sept 27-28? * discussion on camera to see ETM HR surface started [Akutsu, Inoue, Kokeyama] {*} * start with a plan to use viewport at EXA/EYA * baffle design have to be modified to see the edge of ETM * how to extract AS beam should be fixed by MIF * extract SR2 reflected beam at SR3 chamber {*} |
Line 65: | Line 44: |
* how to extract AS beam should be fixed by MIF * extract SR2 reflected beam at SR3 chamber * according to CRYp current schedule; * Oct 31, 2017: ETMY CRYp installation done * Dec 8, 2017: ETMY cool down starts * Feb 13, 2018: ETMX CRYp installation done * Mar 2, 2018: ETMY cool down starts * initial alignment plan including green is taken cared by MIF [confirmed with Kawamura, Moriwaki on Aug 30] |
* green alignment plan not yet [MIF] |
Line 95: | Line 67: |
* asked Izumi and Kokeyama | * photos arrived [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=5492|JGW-T1605492]] {*} |
Line 98: | Line 70: |
* RF PD / RF QPD noise and transimpedance characterization [who?] | * RF PD / RF QPD noise and transimpedance characterization [NiigataU?] * need to check RF QPDs for IMC WFS, by the end of Oct 2016 * IR LED is at Kamioka, no network analyzer at Kamioka (one at Toyama U and the other at Kashiwa) |
Line 128: | Line 102: |
* Requirement on actuator range for IMMT [Ohishi] * magnet size: 2 mm dia, 5 mm long * coil turns: 39? * this gives 4 times larger efficiency than the IMC coil efficiency * this gives 50 mm * (1.4e-3 N/A * 4) * 4 magnets * 1/80 A/V / 9.6e-4 kg*m^2 / (2*pi*3 Hz)^2 = 4.1e-5 rad/V efficiency * is this enough? |
|
Line 134: | Line 114: |
* iKAGRA post-run calibration mystery [Aso] * mysterious LPF was from saturation ([[http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=1958|elog #1958]]) |
|
Line 141: | Line 118: |
* Viewport quality for GV between SRM and OMMT [Akutsu] | * viewport quality for GV between SRM and OMMT [Akutsu] |
Line 159: | Line 136: |
* design suspended table similar to TMS? | * design suspended table similar to TMS? {*} |
Line 161: | Line 138: |
* '''Ask Tomaru about the parameters and actuator design, range''' | * actuator noise calculation on going by Miyamoto & Okutomi {*} |
ISC Meeting on 2016/10/17 14:00 - 15:00
Participants:
Next meeting
2016/11/14 14:00 - 15:00 ??
Agenda
- MIR update [Hirose]
- coated PRM reflectivity acceptable?
- required spec was 10 +0.1 % / -0 %, but measured value was 10.35 %
- coated PRM reflectivity acceptable?
- bKAGRA Phase 1 optical configuration study [Michimura]
summary: JGW-T1605595
- ASC [Enomoto]
noise study by NoiseBudget [Enomoto]
Enomoto volunteered to do ASC NoiseBudget; meeting on Sept 27
- trouble on number of licenses and library links, but finally able to run example model
- effect on WFS from RF HOMs [who?]
- check if reference spheres for PR mirrors are available at Caltech [Hirose]
- 9.0m (CC), 11.5m (CC), 6.5m (CC), 5.0m (CC), 34m (CX), 36m (CX) were available
- PR2/SR2 is -3.0764m/-2.9872m and PR3/SR3 is 24.9165m. Maybe 5.0m TS can be used for PR2/SR2.
- what about PR3/SR3, PRM/SRM?
- check if IMC length stability and others are compatible with 3-km PRMI [Michimura]
bKAGRA Phase 1 initial alignment / commissioning plan [Michimura]: JGW-T1605595
procedure summarized in JGW-T1605692
- presented at Chief Meeting on Sept 26
TMS BRT alignment could be tough because of dim transmitted beam after ETM installation
- use green?
check optical layout [Michimura->Aso]
check if ETM transmitted beam can go through when ETM is not installed [Michimura]
- ETM transmitted beam can reach EXT/EYT when no wedge (5.6 mm shifted from the center of EXT/EYT)
- EXT/EYT is installed considering ETM wedge effect
wide/narrow angle baffles for Phase 1? [Akutsu]
talk with Uchiyama & Saito on Sept 27-28?
discussion on camera to see ETM HR surface started [Akutsu, Inoue, Kokeyama]
- start with a plan to use viewport at EXA/EYA
- baffle design have to be modified to see the edge of ETM
- how to extract AS beam should be fixed by MIF
extract SR2 reflected beam at SR3 chamber
- IMMT1-IMMT2 beam collimation plan not yet [MIF]
- green alignment plan not yet [MIF]
bKAGRA Phase 1 analog electronics (Analog Electronics for ISC) [Michimura]
- Quad IQ Demodulator heat-up issue
- 1st stage amp is heating up
we have to decide if we need 1st stage amp or not
remake of Quad IQ Demodulator LSC to ASC [Michimura->Niigata students?; by 2016.10]
- MIF will take care instead of AEL
- mass production will be taken care by AEL
4-way splitter (Mini-Circuits ZFSC-4-1-S+) arrived at Kamioka -> Mozumi office loft
RF Distribution Amplifier [Michimura->Niigata students?; by 2016.10]
- we will omit RF monitor for now, and add them later
Nakano found front/rear panels -> Mozumi office loft
ordered RF amp (Wenzel LNBA-11-23-CK-100-15) -> not yet arrived (by the end of Sept?)
8-way splitter (Mini-Circuits ZCSC-8-1+), coupler (Mini-Circuits ZX30-20-4) arrived at Kamioka -> Mozumi office loft
cables and connectors to assemble one chassis by hand arrived at Kamioka -> Kokeyama's desk
basically copy of LIGO-D1000124, but we will omit Interface for the first stage
- asked AEL to make RF amplifier interface board (which is also used for Frequency Doubler) [Michimura]
RF Patch Panel modification [Michimura->Niigata students?]
- one by one by hand is tough; outsource?
- Electronics request meeting with Miyakawa/Kamiizumi on Aug 24
- photos of the assembled chassis are helpful for AEL
does anyone have a photo of Frequeny Doubler? LIGO-D1002178
photos arrived JGW-T1605492
- photos of the assembled chassis are helpful for AEL
- Quad IQ Demodulator heat-up issue
- RF PDs and RF QPDs
- RF PD / RF QPD noise and transimpedance characterization [NiigataU?]
- need to check RF QPDs for IMC WFS, by the end of Oct 2016
- IR LED is at Kamioka, no network analyzer at Kamioka (one at Toyama U and the other at Kashiwa)
- RF PD modification [who?]
- fix DC path
- solve single supply issue (RF PDs easily break when accidentally supplied with single)
- fix plugs so that Dsub 9pin cable fixes better
- RF PD / RF QPD noise and transimpedance characterization [NiigataU?]
Output optical tables [Michimura] (OutputTables wiki)
Kawamura suggested to move this task from IOO to MIF
- vacuum optics to extract beams for each port (except for REFL and AS DC) and related beam shutters will also be MIF task
- MIF and IOO agreed, SEO agreed, next step is budget migration
- RF generation scheme [Michimura]
- f1 = 3/8*f2, f3 = 10/8*f2
- we need 2*f1, 2*f2, f3-f1, f3-f2 as well
- use harmonics generator (x2, x3, x6, x8, x10, x16 for f2/8 = 5.62698725 MHz (FSR for IMC))
- seeking for vendors
MIF and IOO agreed to use 13.78 MHz (~= f2/8*2.45) for IMC sideband (JGW-T1605493)
MIF agreed to use 32 MHz and 33 MHz for ALS sidebands JGW-T1605626
- may be IMC sideband (and ALS sidebands) should also needs to be phase locked with f1/f2/f3 to avoid "whistling noise"
Arm Length Stabilization plan (JGW-T1605353)
NoiseBudget [Kambara]
- results agreed with Tatsumi Simulink model
- include fiber noise (fiber setup is different from Tatsumi model)
- fiber length? how to do the wiring?
- include phase noise from mirror vibration for IR beat setup (it is one of the limiting noise source for aLIGO)
- schedule and plan for the procurement of circuits should be fixed soon
- keep in touch with AEL group
- Requirement on actuator range for IMMT [Ohishi]
- magnet size: 2 mm dia, 5 mm long
- coil turns: 39?
- this gives 4 times larger efficiency than the IMC coil efficiency
this gives 50 mm * (1.4e-3 N/A * 4) * 4 magnets * 1/80 A/V / 9.6e-4 kg*m2 / (2*pi*3 Hz)2 = 4.1e-5 rad/V efficiency
- is this enough?
- bKAGRA optical layout around PRC
- POY clipping issue will be solved by modifying PR3 optical bench suspension [Shoda]
- we need layout CAD for POY pickoff mirror, POP pickoff mirror to design baffles
- budget for baffles around POY and POP were shifted to next FY [SEO]
- Requirement for the noise of watchdogs for coil drivers [Aso]
recent result show dR < 1e-7 Ohm/rtHz, so it may meet the requirement
slow (~20 min) drift at dR ~ 5e-4 Ohm -> this should be negligible
- viewport quality for GV between SRM and OMMT [Akutsu]
- aLIGO case: SRM-OFI-viewport, KAGRA case: SRM-viewport-OMMT-OFI
- aLIGO viewport is always closed
if we need super quality viewport, we have to decide soon
BS baffle could make contract defect? (LIGO-T1000090)
- ask Akutsu and Hiro
- BS has 370 mm dia and beam at BS is 2*36 mm dia. So, it should be in principle OK. But recoil mass aperture should be considered.
- bKAGRA ISC cabling [Michimura/Doi]
- announced to IOO mailing list
- need to update the cabling diagram
- Mirror absorption measurement status [Hirose]
- Output optics status [Somiya]
suspensions for OMMT1/2 is same as IMMT1/2 (driver list for now: JGW-L1605334)
- we have to make vacuum compatible PD/QPD for OMC by 2018.3
- beam shutter: prototype done, AR coating and driver circuit design not yet
OMC suspension requirement cross check [Somiya]
- OFI, OMMT, OMC meeting on 2016.9.14
design suspended table similar to TMS?
- Magnetic noise, actuator noise calculation for cryogenic payload [Michimura]
actuator noise calculation on going by Miyamoto & Okutomi
Task list update (TaskList) [Michimura]