Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2020-02-28 15:55:45
Size: 2162
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2020-02-28 16:24:07
Size: 4282
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
 * Summary of current measurements
  * X-arm round-trip loss from reflectivity is 86(3) ppm https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=7307
  * Y-arm round-trip loss: NOT MEASURED YET
 * Summary of measurements so far
  * X-arm round-trip loss from reflectivity is 86(3) ppm (if we assume no birefringence) https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=7307
Line 23: Line 22:
  * Power recycling gain for the sidebands are
  * DRMI on 1f is fine. Lasts 30 min or so
  * Power recycling gain for the sidebands are 2 or so (very rough estimate).
  * DRMI on 1f is fine. Lasts 30 min or so.
Line 26: Line 25:
  * CMRR for intensity noise. https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13028

 * Summary of calculations
  * Effect of ITM asymmtery to sensitivity: https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10352
  * Effect of ITM asymmetry to ASC: https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=10359
  * Effect of inhomogeneity (without birefringence): https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.082005
Line 28: Line 33:
  * Try DRFPMI locking for one more week.
  * X-arm and Y-arm reflectivity/loss measurements with polarization considered
  * Re-measurement of CMRR for frequency noise https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13069
  * Measure power recycling gain for sidebands (POP 2f with FPMI locked and PRFPMI locked)
  * Measure MICH contrast defect with MICH locked and FPMI locked
  * OMC cavity scan to scan mode content of AS beam
  * Scattered light measurement in PRC by sweeping PRM and PR2/3 deferentially.
Line 30: Line 42:
  * DRFPMI LSC and ASC sensing matrix with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry
  * Frequency noise and intensity noise coupling with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry
  * MICH/PRCL/SRCL to DARM coupling with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry

 * O4 Schedule https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=9209
Line 32: Line 49:
  *   * We are not sure yet whether birefringence is limiting our sensitivity and stability. DRFPMI locking probably possible with current interferometer.
  * Putting polarizers inside PRC and SRC might improve the sensitivity and stability, but it might introduce some extra issue (thermal lens, extra loss, scattered light etc).
  * May be better to focus on characterization of the interferometer and the preparation of better ITMs rather than the preparation of polarizers.
  * It is always good to prepare for the unexpected if we have manpower and money. Preparing polarizers now might save our lives in the future.
  * Measurement listed above must be performed before the vent for O4 to characterize the current situation and to make a plan for O4.

ISC Meeting on 2020/03/09 14:00 - 15:00

Participants:

Zoom meeting: https://zoom.us/j/6676627462

Next meeting

TBD

back to Meetings page

Minutes

Agenda

  • We want to know what to do for O4 with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry
  • Summary of measurements so far
  • Summary of calculations
  • List of measurements to be done before the vent for O4
    • Try DRFPMI locking for one more week.
    • X-arm and Y-arm reflectivity/loss measurements with polarization considered
    • Re-measurement of CMRR for frequency noise https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=13069

    • Measure power recycling gain for sidebands (POP 2f with FPMI locked and PRFPMI locked)
    • Measure MICH contrast defect with MICH locked and FPMI locked
    • OMC cavity scan to scan mode content of AS beam
    • Scattered light measurement in PRC by sweeping PRM and PR2/3 deferentially.
  • List of calculations to be done
    • DRFPMI LSC and ASC sensing matrix with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry
    • Frequency noise and intensity noise coupling with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry
    • MICH/PRCL/SRCL to DARM coupling with birefringence and ITM transmission asymmetry
  • O4 Schedule https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=9209

  • Executive summary (tentative)
    • We are not sure yet whether birefringence is limiting our sensitivity and stability. DRFPMI locking probably possible with current interferometer.
    • Putting polarizers inside PRC and SRC might improve the sensitivity and stability, but it might introduce some extra issue (thermal lens, extra loss, scattered light etc).
    • May be better to focus on characterization of the interferometer and the preparation of better ITMs rather than the preparation of polarizers.
    • It is always good to prepare for the unexpected if we have manpower and money. Preparing polarizers now might save our lives in the future.
    • Measurement listed above must be performed before the vent for O4 to characterize the current situation and to make a plan for O4.

KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20200309 (last edited 2020-04-17 23:38:36 by YutaMichimura)