Size: 3640
Comment:
|
Size: 6262
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
Participants: | Participants: Kenta Tanaka, Shinji Miyoki, Haoyu Wang, Eleonora Caposaca, Kiwamu Izumi, Koji Nagano, Masayuki Nakano, Matteo Leonardi, Osamu Miyakawa, Ryutaro Takahashi, Kentaro Somiya, Tomotada Akutsu, Yoichi Aso, Yuta Michimura |
Line 6: | Line 6: |
Time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2020&month=7&day=6&hour=4&min=30&sec=0&p1=248&p2=237&p3=4399&p4=137 | Your time zone: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200706T0430 |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
When necessary | When necessary (New meeting slot: bi-weekly Mondays, from 13:00 JST) |
Line 14: | Line 14: |
* Video record of the meeting: [[JGW-T2011793|https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11793]] * Summary of current measurements so far * LSC sensing matrix, measurements vs simulation * The parameter choice of "BRSE_SDMR1_17_45" is OK for the Optickle simulation. * SDMR1 means single demodulation, using REFL_1I for CARM. * POP17Q (MICH error signal) seems to have too much DARM contribution. * Although DARM displacement is much smaller than MICH displacement and may be negligible, MICH feedforword would spoil DARM if DARM to MICH coupling is too large * DARM excitation was done by injecting signal at DARM error point, when DARM was fed back to both ETMs * '''A/I''': Sensing matrix re-measurement with * Correct CARM calibration * Feedforword off (probably already done with FF off, but need to double check) * Measurement for both I-phase and Q-phase * Schnupp asymmetry * Result from time of flight measurement (3.36(1) m, [[klog #14575|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14575]]) and that from laser frequency modulation measurement (0.56 m [[klog #14541|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14541]]) are inconsistent * There might be an error in BS calibration, laser frequency calibration and/or calculations * ETM calibration starting from free-swinging Michelson and Pcal ETM calibration seems to be consistent * Laser frequency calibration using ALS AOM and Pcal ETM calibration seems to be consistent * Calculations are confirmed independently by Keiko and Masayuki * '''A/I''' Check the calculations again * PRC length measurements * Time of flight measurement would be possible if you use AS beam * '''A/I''' PRY length measurement to be done once IFO is recovered * OMC scan to see mode content of AS beam * Carrier and f1 HOM3 mode seems to be overlapped [[klog #14691 omcmodes.pdf|https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/uploads/14691_20200705054303_omcmodes.pdf]] * New ISC member * Kenta Tanaka (ICRR) -> added to kagra-isc mailing list |
|
Line 26: | Line 53: |
* PRX length: about 68 m https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14633 | * PRX length: about 68 m (designed: 68.2559 m) https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14633 |
Line 29: | Line 56: |
* With X-arm locked https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14620 * carrier and f1 3rd mode is overlapped? |
* Summary http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14696 * carrier and f1 3rd mode is overlapped? http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14620 |
Line 38: | Line 65: |
* https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11792 * New ISC meeting slot? * Bi-weekly SEO and Chief meeting on Modays, from 15:00 JST * How about bi-weekly Mondays 13:00 JST (before chief meetings) |
ISC Meeting on 2020/07/06 13:30 - 14:30
Participants: Kenta Tanaka, Shinji Miyoki, Haoyu Wang, Eleonora Caposaca, Kiwamu Izumi, Koji Nagano, Masayuki Nakano, Matteo Leonardi, Osamu Miyakawa, Ryutaro Takahashi, Kentaro Somiya, Tomotada Akutsu, Yoichi Aso, Yuta Michimura
Zoom meeting: https://zoom.us/j/5045179604
Your time zone: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200706T0430
Next meeting
When necessary (New meeting slot: bi-weekly Mondays, from 13:00 JST)
Minutes
Video record of the meeting: https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11793
- Summary of current measurements so far
- LSC sensing matrix, measurements vs simulation
- The parameter choice of "BRSE_SDMR1_17_45" is OK for the Optickle simulation.
- SDMR1 means single demodulation, using REFL_1I for CARM.
- POP17Q (MICH error signal) seems to have too much DARM contribution.
- Although DARM displacement is much smaller than MICH displacement and may be negligible, MICH feedforword would spoil DARM if DARM to MICH coupling is too large
- DARM excitation was done by injecting signal at DARM error point, when DARM was fed back to both ETMs
A/I: Sensing matrix re-measurement with
- Correct CARM calibration
- Feedforword off (probably already done with FF off, but need to double check)
- Measurement for both I-phase and Q-phase
- The parameter choice of "BRSE_SDMR1_17_45" is OK for the Optickle simulation.
- Schnupp asymmetry
Result from time of flight measurement (3.36(1) m, https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14575) and that from laser frequency modulation measurement (0.56 m https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14541) are inconsistent
- There might be an error in BS calibration, laser frequency calibration and/or calculations
- ETM calibration starting from free-swinging Michelson and Pcal ETM calibration seems to be consistent
- Laser frequency calibration using ALS AOM and Pcal ETM calibration seems to be consistent
- Calculations are confirmed independently by Keiko and Masayuki
A/I Check the calculations again
- There might be an error in BS calibration, laser frequency calibration and/or calculations
- PRC length measurements
- Time of flight measurement would be possible if you use AS beam
A/I PRY length measurement to be done once IFO is recovered
- OMC scan to see mode content of AS beam
Carrier and f1 HOM3 mode seems to be overlapped https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/uploads/14691_20200705054303_omcmodes.pdf
- LSC sensing matrix, measurements vs simulation
- New ISC member
Kenta Tanaka (ICRR) -> added to kagra-isc mailing list
Agenda
- RECORD THE MEETING
- Summary of current measurements so far
- LSC sensing matrix, measurements vs simulation
Optickle simulation: https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=11767
- Parameter choice of "BRSE_SDMR1_17_45" OK?
Measurements: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14515, https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14593
- Schnupp asymmetry measurements
Time of flight measurement successful https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14575
- PRC length measurements
PRY length: 68.28 m with the error of roughly 1 m (designed: 64.926 m) https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/index.php?r=14555
PRX length: about 68 m (designed: 68.2559 m) https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14633
- Actuator efficiency inconsistent between measurements?
- OMC scan to see mode content of AS beam
carrier and f1 3rd mode is overlapped? http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14620
- Frequency noise coupling
- Arm cavity round-trip loss measurement with birefringence effect correctly taken into account
P-pol and S-pol PDs placed on POS table https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=14622
- LSC sensing matrix, measurements vs simulation
- Birefringence simulations with FINESSE
- Any volunteer to add polarization to FINESSE code?
- "directional beamsplitter" could be used to simulate DRFPMI with FINESSE using s/p two-world approach [Haoyu]
- New ISC meeting slot?
- Bi-weekly SEO and Chief meeting on Modays, from 15:00 JST
- How about bi-weekly Mondays 13:00 JST (before chief meetings)
Copy from previous meeting
- Simulation activities necessary
- LSC and ASC simulations with current ITMs and current interferometer setup
- Especially LSC simulations not done for PRFPMI and DRMI, and 3f locking
- Compare measured LSC and ASC sensing matrices with simulations
- Compare measured recycling gain (for carrier and sidebands) with simulations
- Compare measured AS mode content with simulations
- Compare measured MICH/PRCL/SRCL controls noise coupling with simulations
- Compare measured intensity/frequency noise coupling with simulations
- Thermal lensing in BS
- LSC and ASC simulations with current ITMs and current interferometer setup
- Measurements necessary to do simulation work
- PRC (SRC) length and Gouy phase
- Schnupp asymmetry
- modulation depth (arm cavity scan)
- arm cavity length (arm cavity scan)
arm cavity round-trip loss measurement with birefringence effect correctly taken into account (with PBS at POP/POS and TRX/TRY) JGW-T2011633
- Power recycling gain for carrier and sidebands
- Throughput from IMC output to AS RF, OMC DC, REFL, POP, TRX, TRY
- Measurements necessary to compare the result with simulation
- frequency/intensity noise coupling, down to ~10 Hz
- Measure power recycling gain for sidebands (POP 2f with FPMI locked and PRFPMI locked)
- DRFPMI LSC and ASC sensing matrix
- MICH/PRCL/SRCL to DARM coupling
- Measure MICH contrast defect with MICH locked and FPMI locked
- OMC cavity scan to scan mode content of AS beam
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1w4q8OvX9E6nkYSgshLYLoZH5yvQXHvGmL1agux8ztx0/edit#gid=0
- Type-A, B, Bp actuation efficiency measurements (for actuator noise)