Differences between revisions 8 and 14 (spanning 6 versions)
Revision 8 as of 2021-08-15 09:45:39
Size: 1617
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2021-08-16 15:07:16
Size: 3254
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 2: Line 2:
Participants: Participants: Shinji Miyoki, Naoki Koyama, Osamu Miyakawa, Terrence Tak Lun Tsang, Yoichi Aso, Tatsuki Washimi, Chiaki Hirose, Takafumi Ushiba, Kenta Tanaka, Marc Eisenmann, Hirotaka Yuzurihara, Yuta Michimura
Line 14: Line 14:
 * Possibility of shortening Xarm and Yarm commissioning
  * We decided to show the shortened version of the schedule and task list, and ask for suggestions.
  * Shortened task list
   * POP investigation, REFL WFS and POP WFS consistency check, arm cavity alignment to check mid-size baffle positions
   * Other tasks are postponed to FPMI commissioning in-vac
  * Things to ask for suggestions
   * Target values for mode matching and laser power throughput
   * Whether if we should adjust PR2 and PR3 to improve the mode matching in air
 * Requirements for local damping
  * We need to check the status of coil drivers actually installed. For most of the suspensions, high power ones are currently used and this eases the requirement.
  * Nakano-kun said PRs are important for achieving the lock, but 7.3 um/sec requirement seems to be easily achievable. We need to check the current values.
  * For Type-A suspensions, <240 um/sec is the requirement for arm green locking, but there is another requirement coming from the central part locking. ITMs needs to be settled down to a level comparable to BS, SRs and PRs to lock recycling cavities (See text right below Table 5.1 in Sekiguchi thesis).
  * Let's set the requirement to be <0.44 um/sec for central part locking
 * What we want to ask the reviewers?
  * Send Michimura an email if you have some suggestions.
Line 21: Line 36:
  * PRs (Type-Bp): <73. um/sec, <1 urad RMS   * PRs (Type-Bp): <7.3 um/sec, <1 urad RMS
Line 33: Line 48:
  * To be discussed at the IMC ASC weekly on Wednesday

ISC Meeting for ASC Strategies 2021/08/16 13:00 - 15:00

Participants: Shinji Miyoki, Naoki Koyama, Osamu Miyakawa, Terrence Tak Lun Tsang, Yoichi Aso, Tatsuki Washimi, Chiaki Hirose, Takafumi Ushiba, Kenta Tanaka, Marc Eisenmann, Hirotaka Yuzurihara, Yuta Michimura

Zoom meeting: https://zoom.us/j/5045179604

Your time zone: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20210816T0400

Next meeting

TBD

back to Meetings page

Minutes

  • Possibility of shortening Xarm and Yarm commissioning
    • We decided to show the shortened version of the schedule and task list, and ask for suggestions.
    • Shortened task list
      • POP investigation, REFL WFS and POP WFS consistency check, arm cavity alignment to check mid-size baffle positions
      • Other tasks are postponed to FPMI commissioning in-vac
    • Things to ask for suggestions
      • Target values for mode matching and laser power throughput
      • Whether if we should adjust PR2 and PR3 to improve the mode matching in air
  • Requirements for local damping
    • We need to check the status of coil drivers actually installed. For most of the suspensions, high power ones are currently used and this eases the requirement.
    • Nakano-kun said PRs are important for achieving the lock, but 7.3 um/sec requirement seems to be easily achievable. We need to check the current values.
    • For Type-A suspensions, <240 um/sec is the requirement for arm green locking, but there is another requirement coming from the central part locking. ITMs needs to be settled down to a level comparable to BS, SRs and PRs to lock recycling cavities (See text right below Table 5.1 in Sekiguchi thesis).

    • Let's set the requirement to be <0.44 um/sec for central part locking

  • What we want to ask the reviewers?
    • Send Michimura an email if you have some suggestions.

Agenda

KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20210816 (last edited 2021-08-16 15:07:16 by YutaMichimura)