Differences between revisions 12 and 13
Revision 12 as of 2023-07-24 16:34:10
Size: 1480
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2023-07-24 16:36:14
Size: 1573
Editor: miyoki
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 28: Line 28:
  *    * Let's put 3rd PD anyway. After we will check DGS.
  * The 2nd PD will not require Dolphine?

CARM signal detection by using 2nd PD 2023/07/24

Participants: Komori, Aso, Miyoki, Ushiba, Uchiyama, Miyakawa, Akutsu, Dan, Oshino, Washimi, YamaT, Takahashi.R, Kanda,

Zoom meeting: https://zoom.us/j/5045179604

Minutes

  • Presentation by Komori-kun

    • 2/7 CARM out of loop measurement.
      • Old estimation: shotnoise should be below the unknown noise (< kHz).

      • For noise budget: If shot noise at in-loop PD1 limits, the shot noise of PD2 has no coherence with shot noise at PD1.
      • Analog excitation is necessary for injection. But MOC is connected at this point. So we need cable reconnection. SW can be introduced?
    • 3/7 RF PD
      • We have several.
      • Shunt R should be removed. Tune RF properties.
    • 5/7 Reck preparation: OK
    • 6/7 Where we should put PD2?: Wide space
    • 7/7 Schedule: Aug/21~28 (2 days)
  • Opinion:
    • How about 3rd PD for the MICH control?
      • CARM PD can be used, however, the laser power is minimized for CARM. While MICH requires more power!
      • Haoyu calculated we could obtain a better S/N signal or not -> Yes!! 10 times better than CARM Q phase signal.

      • 2nd PD can be used for this purpose?
      • 50mW can be detected by these PDs.
      • 10W is necessary.
      • Model number will increase. Can we?? Dual IQ can be added in a rack?. Quad IQ can be used for minimization? Whitening one more.
      • Let's put 3rd PD anyway. After we will check DGS.
    • The 2nd PD will not require Dolphine?

KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20230724 (last edited 2023-07-24 16:46:22 by miyoki)