Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2025-02-28 15:44:00
Size: 1422
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2025-02-28 15:48:03
Size: 1507
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 14: Line 14:
  * Check if OMC shroud is not conflicting
Line 22: Line 23:
  * Find OMC shroud drawing [Michimura]

In-vac PD/QPD layout meeting 2025/02/28

Time: Feb 28, 2025 14:00-14:40

Participants: Ray-Kuang Lee, Huali Chen, Yoichi Aso, Yuta Michimura

Zoom meeting

Minutes

  • Huali showed almost the final layout idea for AS RF and OMC REFL, with squeezing injection optics.
    • OSTM transmission seems different from CAD
      • Probably because OSTM wedge is not included in Huali's calculations
    • Add periscopes for AS RF in-vac path and OMC REFL path, and a beam diverter for AS RF in-vac path
      • Adding periscopes can reduce the height from approx. 210 mm to 4 inch, and we can use smaller and lighter pedestals
    • Check if OMC shroud is not conflicting
  • Next step is to collect comments for AS and to start REFL/POP planning
    • New student might be available
    • REFL/POP should be done by around summer
  • A/I

    • Update the layout to include periscopes and a beam diverter, add a wedge to OSTM and upload the layout to JGWdoc [Huali]
      • OSTM is 100 mm dia, 30 mm thick, with wedge of 2 deg
      • Thicker side is OMC side from the drawing, but actually installed flipped, so thinner side is OMC side (see Fig. 2 of klog #30159)

    • Find OMC shroud drawing [Michimura]
    • Updated layout will be shared with relevant people for comments [Michimura]
    • Collect information for REFL and start the REFL layout planning (... and POP next) [Michimura]
  • Next meeting: TBD on the week of March 24, with a new student

KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20250228 (last edited 2025-02-28 15:51:16 by YutaMichimura)