Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2025-03-31 15:42:51
Size: 2877
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2025-03-31 15:51:59
Size: 2148
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 19: Line 19:
    * Mounting base can be [[Thorlabs BA1/M|https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=BA1/M]] with [[20 mm dia. posts|https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=8429]]     * Mounting base can be [[https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=BA1/M|Thorlabs BA1/M]] with [[https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=8429|20 mm dia. posts]]
Line 22: Line 22:
  * Let's aim for 800 mm dia. optical breadboard size inside the PD chamber
Line 24: Line 24:

 * Huali showed almost the final layout idea for AS RF and OMC REFL, with squeezing injection optics.
  * OSTM transmission seems different from CAD
   * Probably because OSTM wedge is not included in Huali's calculations
  * Add periscopes for AS RF in-vac path and OMC REFL path, and a beam diverter for AS RF in-vac path
   * Adding periscopes can reduce the height from approx. 210 mm to 4 inch, and we can use smaller and lighter pedestals
  * Check if OMC shroud is not conflicting
 * Next step is to collect comments for AS and to start REFL/POP planning
  * New student might be available
  * REFL/POP should be done by around summer
  * Updated the layout based on the comments from the last meeting (OSTM wedge, periscope and distance traveled within periscope, beam diverter)
  * To avoid AS RF beam being too close to OMC REFL RF QPD 2, we can play with moving optics slightly
   * Clearance of 2 cm should be enough
  * No periscope is needed for squeezing injection (to-be-viewport flange is already 210 mm heigh)
   * squeezing beam require 78 mm dia. pedestal
Line 36: Line 31:
  * Update the layout to include periscopes and a beam diverter, add a wedge to OSTM and upload the layout to JGWdoc [Huali]
   * OSTM is 100 mm dia, 30 mm thick, with wedge of 2 deg
   * Thicker side is OMC side from the drawing, but actually installed flipped, so thinner side is OMC side (see Fig. 2 of [[https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=30159|klog #30159]])
  * Find OMC shroud drawing [Michimura]
   * https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=15840
   * https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=15865
   * https://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=16104
  * Updated layout will be shared with relevant people for comments [Michimura]
  * Collect information for REFL and start the REFL layout planning (... and POP next) [Michimura]
 * Next meeting: TBD on the week of March 24, with a new student
  * Reduce the size of the breadboard to 800 mm dia, and add RF PD layout for REFL [Ryan]
  * Slightly update the layout to have more space between AS RF beam and OMC REFL RF QPD [Huali]
  * Check IFI chamber layout if POM2 the beam is hitting the center of POM2 [Michimura]

 * Next meeting: TBD on the week of April 21+

In-vac PD/QPD layout meeting 2025/03/31

Time: Mar 31, 2025 14:00-14:45

Participants: Ray-Kuang Lee, Huali Chen, Ryan Yang, Yoichi Aso, Yuta Michimura

Zoom meeting

Minutes

  • REFL (Ryan)
    • In-vac RF QPD path almost finished, need info for RF PD path
    • RF PD path
    • RF QPD path
      • Waist size of 0.25 mm radius, and beam radius of sqrt(2)*0.25 mm at RF QPDs are consistent with in-air design
    • Pedestal size
    • Slightly tilt RF PD and RF QPD so that we can damp the PD/QPD reflected beams
    • Let's aim for 800 mm dia. optical breadboard size inside the PD chamber
  • AS (Huali)
    • Updated the layout based on the comments from the last meeting (OSTM wedge, periscope and distance traveled within periscope, beam diverter)
    • To avoid AS RF beam being too close to OMC REFL RF QPD 2, we can play with moving optics slightly
      • Clearance of 2 cm should be enough
    • No periscope is needed for squeezing injection (to-be-viewport flange is already 210 mm heigh)
      • squeezing beam require 78 mm dia. pedestal
  • A/I

    • Reduce the size of the breadboard to 800 mm dia, and add RF PD layout for REFL [Ryan]
    • Slightly update the layout to have more space between AS RF beam and OMC REFL RF QPD [Huali]
    • Check IFI chamber layout if POM2 the beam is hitting the center of POM2 [Michimura]
  • Next meeting: TBD on the week of April 21+

KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20250331 (last edited 2025-03-31 15:55:04 by YutaMichimura)