Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2025-03-31 15:51:59
Size: 2148
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2025-03-31 15:55:04
Size: 2274
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:
    * See, also https://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/IOO/OutputTables/Optics for in-air optics assembly

In-vac PD/QPD layout meeting 2025/03/31

Time: Mar 31, 2025 14:00-14:45

Participants: Ray-Kuang Lee, Huali Chen, Ryan Yang, Yoichi Aso, Yuta Michimura

Zoom meeting

Minutes

  • REFL (Ryan)
  • AS (Huali)
    • Updated the layout based on the comments from the last meeting (OSTM wedge, periscope and distance traveled within periscope, beam diverter)
    • To avoid AS RF beam being too close to OMC REFL RF QPD 2, we can play with moving optics slightly
      • Clearance of 2 cm should be enough
    • No periscope is needed for squeezing injection (to-be-viewport flange is already 210 mm heigh)
      • squeezing beam require 78 mm dia. pedestal
  • A/I

    • Reduce the size of the breadboard to 800 mm dia, and add RF PD layout for REFL [Ryan]
    • Slightly update the layout to have more space between AS RF beam and OMC REFL RF QPD [Huali]
    • Check IFI chamber layout if POM2 the beam is hitting the center of POM2 [Michimura]
  • Next meeting: TBD on the week of April 21+

KAGRA/subgroup/ifo/MIF/Minutes20250331 (last edited 2025-03-31 15:55:04 by YutaMichimura)