Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2009-06-05 13:32:21
Size: 1137
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2009-06-08 23:54:37
Size: 1470
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 6: Line 6:
 * Safty factor of power on BS is 6, not 3 which was assumed before, so that PRG gain can be increased up to 29 insted of 14.5.  * Safety factor of power on BS is 6, not 3 which was assumed before, so that PR gain can be increased up to 29 insted of 14.5.
Line 15: Line 15:

----

== Comments ==

> Safety factor of power on BS is 6...

The current PRG is not 14.5 but 11, which is given with a safety factor of 6. Even with a safety factor of 3, the gain cannot be 29 since the arm reflectivity is not unity. The maximum PRG derived from the finite arm reflectivity is indeed 14.5. (K.Somiya, 6/8)

To do list to define new parameters

It is important to review past parameters and pick up problems to determine new parameters. Known problems are listed here.


  • Safety factor of power on BS is 6, not 3 which was assumed before, so that PR gain can be increased up to 29 insted of 14.5.
  • Arm power was defined by sum of both arm powers. It should be a stored power of single arm.
  • How to determine an exact length of arm, for anti resonance of sidebands?
  • How to determine exact RF frequencies, for HOM of MC2?
  • Total inject power was defiened by only carrier power. It should be defined by carrier and sidebands.
  • Do we need pick off ports? Design of 2007 assumed a pick of between PRM and BS. It won't be existing in the new design, but how about pick off for X arm and Y arm? Should we use AR reflections as the pick off?
  • Redesign of length of MC2 for switching between BRSE and DRSE.
  • How much power is acceptable for single photo diode?
  • Determine macroscopic PRC length and SRC length. It is important to provide these length to the vacuum subgroup to determine the vacuum tube length.


Comments

> Safety factor of power on BS is 6...

The current PRG is not 14.5 but 11, which is given with a safety factor of 6. Even with a safety factor of 3, the gain cannot be 29 since the arm reflectivity is not unity. The maximum PRG derived from the finite arm reflectivity is indeed 14.5. (K.Somiya, 6/8)

LCGT/subgroup/ifo/ISC/TaskList/CurrentStatus/ToDo (last edited 2009-06-09 16:12:42 by OsamuMiyakawa)