Differences between revisions 30 and 31
Revision 30 as of 2012-05-08 16:16:16
Size: 2578
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Revision 31 as of 2012-05-08 16:20:01
Size: 2672
Editor: YoichiAso
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[[../|..Up]]''' '''[[LCGT/subgroup/ifo/ISC/TaskList|..Up]]'''
Line 13: Line 13:
* [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=788|Report in JGWDOC]  *  [[http://gwdoc.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/private/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=788|Report in JGWDOC]]

Line 16: Line 18:
 * [[attachment:GrLock_Table_120127.pdf]]
Line 18: Line 21:
 * [[attachment:tatsu_2012_Jan.xlsx]]
Line 29: Line 32:
[[attachment:Overview_GreenLock.pdf||Overview]] [[attachment:Overview_GreenLock.pdf]]
Line 38: Line 41:
Line 40: Line 42:
Line 50: Line 51:
  * Shot noise of the modulated beam is described by <in^2> = 2 e [I0+1/2 dI Sin(phi)], according to N. Mio and K. Tsubono, Physics LettersA 164 (1992) 255-258. Does nonstationary part cancel because of the orthogonality of the RF and LO signals???
   * Consider only the stationary part, in = sqrt(2 e I0). Thus in/eta/(2 alpha P) = sqrt(e / eta / alpha / P) [rad/rtHz]. This corresponds to 2.5e-8 rad/rtHz.
  * Shot noise of the modulated beam is described by <in^2> = 2 e [I0+1/2 dI Sin(phi)], according to N. Mio and K. Tsubono, Physics LettersA 164 (1992) 255-258. Does nonstationary part cancel because of the orthogonality of the RF and LO signals???
  * Consider only the stationary part, in = sqrt(2 e I0). Thus in/eta/(2 alpha P) = sqrt(e / eta / alpha / P) [rad/rtHz]. This corresponds to 2.5e-8 rad/rtHz.
Line 54: Line 55:
Line 58: Line 58:

..Up

Lock Acquisition

Lock acquisition scheme has to be planed carefully because it was a big problem in the first generation large-scale interferometers.

Probabilistic lock (a.k.a. lucky lock) won't probably work. Other locking schemes such as the arm pre-locking has to be considered.

Auxiliary Lock System

Also known as green laser lock, this scheme will make use of auxiliary lasers to lock the arm cavities first.


Servo simulation

Optical Table Layout

Purchase List


SVN archive

SVN directory

Oscillator phase noise requirement for PLL local oscillator

See here.

Overview of Green Lock Scheme

Overview_GreenLock.pdf

Lock procedure

PDF

Block diagram

BlockDiagram

Description of the blocks

Phase Comparison

  • When you combine two beams with power P, we get the beat note with amplitude of 2 alpha P Sin phi, where alpha is the contrast (0~1) and phi is the relative phase between the fields. Thus, the phase sensitivity is 2 alpha P [W/rad]. e.g. Two 1mW beams geneartes 4mWpp beat if the contrast is 1. The slope is 0.002 alpha W/rad.

  • For the broadband PD, InGaAs is not relevant because of the high junction capacitance. If we use Si PD (like FFD-100 phi=2.5mm), the responsivity is eta = 0.08 [A/W].

  • BBPD Transimepedance and the shotnoise intercept current are assumed to be 1e3 [V/A] and 0.3 [mA], from the experience of LIGO BBPD.
  • Total gain is 1 [V/rad] if we assume alpha and P to be 0.5 and 12.5mW respectively.

  • Shot noise
    • Shot noise of the modulated beam is described by <in^2> = 2 e [I0+1/2 dI Sin(phi)], according to N. Mio and K. Tsubono, Physics LettersA 164 (1992) 255-258. Does nonstationary part cancel because of the orthogonality of the RF and LO signals???

    • Consider only the stationary part, in = sqrt(2 e I0). Thus in/eta/(2 alpha P) = sqrt(e / eta / alpha / P) [rad/rtHz]. This corresponds to 2.5e-8 rad/rtHz.

Frequency noise of NPRO

  • 1e4/f [Hz/rtHz] according to R. Adhikari's PhD thesis.

Shot noise

LCGT/subgroup/ifo/ISC/TaskList/LockAcquisition (last edited 2012-05-08 16:20:01 by YoichiAso)